You are in: Rob's OSM Stuff » UK PRoW » Progress » Suffolk » Discrepancies

Definitive Map and Statement Discrepancies in Suffolk

This page lists discrepancies between the electronic Definitive Statements and the GIS data of Public Rights of Way provided by Suffolk Council (disclaimer / copyright information). Instances are show below where:

To date, the Definitive Statements have been manually checked for 215 out of 484 parishes in the county, and 316 discrepancies have been identified.

Aspall (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   The Statement here claims the route runs from the junction of paths 4 and 7. But in the GIS data this junction is about 30m NE of the end of FP 6. The Definitive Map is ambiguous.

Badley (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 1   Description in statement is a duplicate of FP 21. It describes the combined route of both paths.
FP 21 1 1   Description in statement is a duplicate of FP 11. It describes the combined route of both paths.
FP 26 0 0   Description missing from Statement, and has now been removed from GIS data too.
FP 27 0 0   Description missing from Statement, and has now been removed from GIS data too.

Barnham (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BY 6 1 1   Definitive Statement suggests that the route stays on a straight line though the industrial site at TL85197789. However, the GIS data has the route diverted around on the track to the west.

Barrow (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 13 1 1   Electronic Statement describes a route that is mostly recorded as part of BY 22 in the GIS data. Has there been an upgrade?

Barton Mills (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5 1 1   Description missing in electronic statement: "(No order found for statement)".

Beccles (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 23 1 0   Shown on Definitive Map and in GIS data as FP, but not listed in Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.

Blaxhall (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 2 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as BR in Statement but RB on Map.
RB 2 1 0   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as BR in Statement but RB on Map.
BR 3 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as BR in Statement but RB on Map.
RB 3 1 0   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as BR in Statement but RB on Map.
BR 4 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as BR in Statement but RB on Map.
RB 4 1 0   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as BR in Statement but RB on Map.
FP 10 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Present in statement, but accidentally missed off 1961 Map, after being included in an ealier Map. Missing from GIS data as of 2019-04. Description suggests route is an FP shown on the OS 1:25k 1st series, running from TM37455762 to TM37755758.
BR 20 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as BR in Statement by RB on Map.
RB 20 1 0   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as BR in Statement by RB on Map.
FP 22 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Present in statement, but accidentally missed off 1961 Map, after being included in an ealier Map. Missing from GIS data as of 2019-04.
FP 23 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Present in statement, but accidentally missed off 1961 Map, after being included in an ealier Map. Missing from GIS data as of 2019-04.
FP 24 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Present in statement, but accidentally missed off 1961 Map, after being included in an ealier Map. Missing from GIS data as of 2019-04.
RB 32 1 1   Descriptions in Electronic statement from 2019-04 for RB32 and RB33 seem to be interchanged from the GIS data.
RB 33 1 1   Descriptions in Electronic statement from 2019-04 for RB32 and RB33 seem to be interchanged from the GIS data.

Blundeston (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 7 1 1   As of 2019-04, statement provides no information about the route and is identical to that for FP 7A.
FP 7A 1 1   As of 2019-04, Statement provides no information about the route and is identical to that for FP 7.

Botesdale (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement from 2019-04 is completely wrong; path links FP20 at south edge of A143, and BY3 120m from Common Road.
BY 3 1 1   Electronic Statement of 2019-04 says path starts from Common Road. GIS Data has it starting further W from the junction with FP 2.
BY 50 1 1   Formerly RUPPs 7 and 10. Electronic Description includes part of Burgate BY 50 too. Northern junction with Burgate BY 50 surely must be at the bridge, but GIS data places it 50m further north.

Bradfield St Clare (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Statement says route starts south of the railway bridge, but in the GIS data the line starts to the north at TL89905887. Starting to the South would make more sense, as the path presumably used to run along the south side of the railway line.

Bradfield St George (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 5 1 1   Electronic Statement from 2019-04 has the same description for RB 5 as FP 5X, both describing the whole route.
FP 5X 1 1   Electronic Statement from 2019-04 has the same description for RB 5 as FP 5X, both describing the whole route.
BR 28 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is probably out of date. It claims the route ends at TL90055944 at a junction with FP1 and FP15. In the GIS data the route ends about 45m south at TL90045940. The continuation north from this point is FP 31 in the GIS data.
BR 30 1 1   Electronic Statement says route starts at TL9004059403 at junction with BR 28. In the GIS data the route only starts about 100m north-west of this point at TL89975946. The track between is not shown as a Right of Way.

Brampton (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 10 1 1   According to the Definitive Map and the Electronic Statement, this route includes the track between TM42338325 and TM42498327. GIS data incorrectly shows this as part of FP 11.
FP 11 1 1   Electronic statement does not describe second section between TM42498327 and TM42718324. GIS data incorrectly includes section between TM42338325 and TM42498327, which is part of FP 10 according to the Definitive Map and the Electronic Statement.
FP 13 1 1   Electronic Statement is missing the description of the 450m eastwards section between TM43038181 and TM43488179.
FP 18 1 1   Initial grid reference TM43138110 given in Electronic Statement is incorrect. Definitive Map and GIS data show the route starting from BR 21 at TM43128122.

Brandon (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 18 1 1   In the GIS data, the east-most part is short by about 100m at its western end. In the GIS data, the central and western parts appear to be the wrong (south) side of the river.

Brantham (Babergh)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 0 1 *
BR 4 1 0 *
FP 20 0 1 *
BR 20 1 0 *

Bromeswell (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 8 0 1 *
RB 8 1 0 *
BR 11 0 1 *
RB 11 1 0 *

Bungay (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 26 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is identical to BR 26X, and covers both routes, without distinguishing between them.
BR 26X 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is identical to BR 26X, and covers both routes, without distinguishing between them.

Burgate (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 7 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is a duplicate of that for FP 6. Paper Statement just says "For particulars of this path, see No. 5."
BY 15 1 1   Recorded as CRB in 2013 paper statement. Has a modification order been made since?

Bury St Edmunds (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 9 1 1   Electronic Statement has the same description for FP 9 as FP 9X, both describing the whole route. In the GIS data, 9 is the western part.
FP 9X 1 1   Electronic Statement has the same description for FP 9 as FP 9X, both describing the whole route. In the GIS data, 9X is the eastern part.
FP 17 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement doesn't distinguish between 17 and 17X. It also suggests route should be continuous, i.e. segment from TL85856330 to Cullham Road missing from the GIS data should be an FP or BR.
RB 17X 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement doesn't distinguish between 17 and 17X. It also suggests route should be continuous, i.e. segment from TL85856330 to Cullham Road missing from the GIS data should be an FP or BR.
FP 20 1 1   Line in GIS data is split with a gap for the A1302. Electronic Statement describes a continuous route.
BR 33 1 1   Grid reference at end of way should be TL84456557 not TL84456447, as written in Electronic statement.

Capel St Mary (Babergh)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 12 1 1   GIS route is in three separate sections. Description does not make it clear that thi is the case.
FP 38 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as FP in Statement but BR on Definitive Map.
BR 38 1 0   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as FP in Statement but BR on Definitive Map.

Carlton Colville (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 8 1 1   The Electronic Statement does not mention the second part of the route from Marsh Lane to Sprats Water Lane.
FP 14A 1 1   The description of this route is missing from the Electronic Statement.
BR 17 1 1   The description of this route is missing from the Electronic Statement.

Cavendish (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 1   Line in GIS data is in two parts, with the path between TL79864632 and TL79824629 being shown as part of FP 16 instead. The Statement suggests FP 11 should be continuous, with FP 16 finishing at TL79864632.
FP 20 1 1   Line in GIS data appears wrong at TL81174677. The Statement says the route runs south along the East side of the tree belt.
FP 23 1 1   Statement says the path starts at the south end of FP 25 on the north bank of the river, but the line in the GIS data starts at TL79894560, which about 50m north of this point.
FP 26 0 1   Missing from GIS data but included in Electronic Statement, as a spur from FP 5 to the parish boundary. Presumably, the spur in FP 5 in the GIS data should actually be re-numbered as FP 26.

Chevington (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BY 16 1 1   Electronic Statement gives GR for S end of path, but route in GIS data only starts 140m further on at TL77755803. The missing section is probably dual with Hargrave BY 23.

Cockfield (Babergh)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 1 1   Electronic Statement describes a completely different route to the GIS data. Has there been a modification and the description didn't get updated?
FP 12 1 1   Statement only describes section from TL90635430 to Earl's Hall Bridge at TL91035356. The line in the GIS data continues along the old railway to TL91415227.
FP 20 1 1   No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.
FP 21 1 1   No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.
FP 22 1 1   No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.
FP 23 1 1   No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.
FP 24 1 1   No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.
FP 25 1 1   No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.

Creeting St Mary (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5A 1 1   Statement description is missing the section between TM09695686 and Love/Low Lane at TM09475705, which is included in the GIS data.
FP 16 1 1   End of GIS route at TM10865730 is not at Red House Farm.
FP 17 1 1   GIS route starts at TM10655752 on All Saints Road and runs along Chequers Lane to TM10865730 which is not at Red House Farm. Hence description in statement makes no sense.
FP 19 1 1   Statement is erroneously a duplicate of FP 20.
BR 21 1 1   GIS route stops at junction at TM09875640, so doesn't reach College Farm. The continuation to there is FP 22 in the GIS data.
BR 32 1 1   The "path from Hungercut Hall" referred to in the statement is actually BR 55.
FP 33 1 1   In GIS data the section along the towpath is incorrectly marked as FP 58.
FP 35 1 1   Statement simply says "For particulars of this path see No. 37." But there is no path 37. It probably should be 38.
FP 38 1 1   Description includes FP 35 too.
FP 40 1 1   In statement refernce to FP 37 should be FP 38.
FP 58 1 1   Statement is clear that there is a gap in this path (which is filled by FP 33). However, the GIS data includeas the whole of the tow-path route as FP 58.
FP 59 1 1   Statement incorrectly refers to FP 58, when it should be FP 33.

Culford (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   GIS data has this path in two pieces. The Electronic Statement only includes a description for the northern piece. The first grid reference in the Statement is incorrect; TL85397471 would be better.

Dalham (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 8 1 1   Electronic Statement and GIS data are at odds. GIS data is missing the section between TL74896006 and TL75066070, while the Statement is missing the section between TL75066070 and TL74856078. Has there been a diversion / modification order that has only been actioned in one place?

Debenham (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 20 1 1   Statement says route ends at Waddlegouse Lane, which would presumably be at TM19656425. But the GIS data the route continues past Grove Farm to TM19766342.
BR 24 1 1   As of 2019-01, the description in the Statement is completely messed up.

Denham (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   From the Electronic Statement, this appears to be mostly coincident with BR 9, although it is not shown as such in the GIS data or on the Definitive Map.

Earl Stonham (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 39 0 1 *

Ellough (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 2 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is somewhat mangled. Compass points and crossing/following runways are often mixed up. Southern north-south section in the GIS data between TM44918772 and TM44968698 is not described at all.

Elmswell (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 0 1 *

Eye (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 15 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement doesn't mention the south-eastern part, nor the gap (in Yaxley parish) between the other two parts.
FP 36 1 1   Should the NE end of this path join FP 21? The Statement doesn't say and the lines don't join in the GIS data. But the path would be a bit pointless otherwise.
RB 45 1 1   Description in the Electronic Statement is a duplicate of that for BY 37.

Falkenham (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 7 0 1   Listed in Electronic Statement as route from "Deben Lodge Drift" to "Watton[sic] boundry and Gulpher Farm", but missing from GIS data. "Watton" should probably be "Walton", but this is now in Felixstowe Parish. Deben Lodge is at TM30093815 in Falkenham, while Gulpher Farm is at TM30463684 in Felixstowe.

Foxhall (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 31 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is a duplicate of BR32 and includes both routes. GIS data shows an unexpected gap between the two.
BR 32 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is a duplicate of BR31 and includes both routes. GIS data shows an unexpected gap between the two.
FP 44 1 0   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as BR in Statement but FP on Definitive Map.
BR 44 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as BR in Statement but FP on Definitive Map.

Framlingham (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Description in Statement says route ends at Earl Soham FP 3. But that path does not exist, and the route in the GIS data does not go to the Earl Soham parish boundary.
FP 32 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as FP in Statement but BR on Definitive Map.
BR 32 1 0   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as FP in Statement but BR on Definitive Map.
FP 63 1 1   Description in Statement has not been updated to account fro BR 63A, which now follows the second half of this route.
FP 64 1 1   Description in Statement as of 2019-01 is actually the corrected description for FP 63.
FP 81 1 1   Description in Statement is for combined FP 81 and BR 81X routes, without distinguishing them.
BR 81X 1 1   Description in Statement is for combined FP 81 and BR 81X routes, without distinguishing them.
FP 86 0 1   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as FP in Statement but BR on Definitive Map.
BR 86 1 0   Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as FP in Statement but BR on Definitive Map.

Freckenham (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 2 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement suggests route starts part way along Mortimer Lane (and Southern end from the B1102 to TL66467223 is an Unclassified Highway U6000). GIS data shows route starting from TL66437207 at the B1102.
BR 2X 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement just duplicated that of RB 2.
BY 4 1 1   Description says route starts on Turnpike Road opposite the Red Lodge PH, but the GIS data has it starting 100m down the Carrops at TL69416976 to join with BY6. Presumably route was diverted when houses built, and description wasn't updated.
BR 5 0 1   Now absent from GIS data (instead recorded as Red Lodge BR 5), but still present in Electronic Statement as of 2019-01.

Gazeley (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Start grid reference in Electronic Statement is not consistent with GIS data.
BR 12 1 1   Near the junction with FP 6 around TL74166284 the line in the GIS data is not consistent with the description in the Electronic Statement.

Gisleham (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   In electronic Statement of 2019-01, there are some segments missing from the description between Kessingland Parish Boundary to Church Road. Only 350m is accounted for, when the route is actually around 1.2km.
FP 6 1 1   In statement, it appears that only a total of 5m is described. Whereas in the GIS data, a much longer eastern section is included, to join with FP 8 at TM51208712.

Glemsford (Babergh)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Statement is identical for FP 1 and RB 1X, with no precise indication of where the split is.
RB 1X 1 1   Statement is identical for FP 1 and RB 1X, with no precise indication of where the split is.
FP 10 1 1   Second grid reference in statement is incorrect: TL82644732 should be TL82364732.
RB 11 1 1   Statement is identical for RB 11 and FP 11X, with no indication of where the split is.
FP 11X 1 1   Statement is identical for RB 11 and FP 11X, with no indication of where the split is.
FP 15 1 1   GIS data traces a longer route than the statement. The section from TL82474807 to TL82324841 is not desribed in the statement.
RB 34 1 1   Statement describes both 34 and 34X with no distinction between them.
FP 34X 1 1   Statement describes both 34 and 34X with no distinction between them.
RB 36 1 1   Statement says southern end meets FP 35, but the description and GIS data for FP 35 disagree. Statement is s duplicate of 36X, with no indication of where the status changes.
FP 36X 1 1   Statement is s duplicate of 36, with no indication of where the status changes.
BR 39 1 1   Statement is identical for BR 39 and FP 39X, with no indication of where the split is.
FP 39X 1 1   Statement is identical for BR 39 and FP 39X, with no indication of where the split is.
FP 43 1 1   GIS data includes a additional spur running north-west from the main route at TL83404841 to join Low Street, which is not mentioned in the statement.
RB 44 1 1   Statement is identical for RB 44 and FP 44X, with no indication of where the split is.
FP 44X 1 1   Statement is identical for RB 44 and FP 44X, with no indication of where the split is.
FP 48 1 1   Statement is s duplicate of 48X, with no indication of where the status changes.
RB 48X 1 1   Statement is s duplicate of 48X, with no indication of where the status changes.

Great Barton (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 12 0 1   Present in 2019-01 Electronic Statement, but with no description. Missing from GIS data. Definitive Map shows is as an extinguished route at the former level crossing at TL90696505.

Great Bealings (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 19 0 1 *
RB 19 1 0 *

Great Bradley (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Route in GIS data includes an erroneous tripled-over section around TL66715386, which means the GIS length is around 100m longer than it should be.

Great Finborough (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BY 47 1 1   Suffolk County Council confirmed July 2020 that the section from TM00675578 to TM00885538 is an Unclassified Highway and not part of Byway 47. The TRO covering BY 47 begins at end of metalled road. The information on published working copy of Definitive Map and GIS data is incorrect.

Great Wratting (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Compass points in description seem wrong in several places.

Halesworth (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Definitive Statement says route continues to Six Arches Bridge, but the line in the GIS data stops about 100m short at TM39187668. The Definitive Map agrees with the Statement. The statement fror Wenhaston also suggests FP 9 of that parish meets Swan Lane at the Bridge.
FP 6 1 0   Description found in statement under FP 6(1) and FP 6(2), but both parts included in the GIS data as "FP 6".
FP 6(1) 0 1   First part of FP 6 has its own statement.
FP 6(2) 0 1   Second part of FP 6 has its own statement.

Hargrave (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Electronic Statement says path starts from the Church; GIS data has is commencing from BR 21.
FP 2 1 1   Has this path been diverted? If so, the Electronic Statement need updating to match the route in the GIS data.
FP 3 1 1   Electronic Statement says path starts at Southwood Park Farm, but route in GIS data only starts from Carter's Park wood. Has the path been partly extinguished? Also mapped route not quite right near SE corner of Carter's Park.
FP 6 1 1   Northern end meets the east end of BR 21, not FP 1 as claimed in the Electronic Statement.

Haverhill (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3A 0 1   Listed in Electroinc Statement without a description.
FP 15 1 1   According to the Electronic Statement, the section of route on Hollands Road between Duddery Hill at TL67154509 and Rookwood Way at TL67214496 should be part of FP 16, but in the GIS data it's part of FP 15.
FP 16 1 1   According to the Electronic Statement, the section of route on Hollands Road between Duddery Hill at TL67154509 and Rookwood Way at TL67214496 should be part of FP 16, but in the GIS data it's part of FP 15.
FP 27 1 1   GIS route is in two pieces, but this is not mentioned in the description in Electronic Statement. The missing section between TL68464541 and TL68534533 is recorded in the GIS data as Kedington FP 19.
FP 33 1 1   Electronic Description has not been updated following (presumed) diversion for housing estate.
FP 36 1 1   Route listed in the Electronic Statement, but no description present.

Hemley (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 4 1 1   On definitive map and in the GIS data, the northern end of the route is shown at TM28464297, so it does not join to the southern end of BR 2 at TM28424299. The Statement says both routes should terminate at "Hemley Hall yard", and one would have expected them to join up. Instead there is a 30m gap, which is not recorded as a Right of Way.

Henstead (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 9 1 1   Definitive Statement says the route continues to Mill Road in the parish of Sotterley, but there is no such route in the Definitive Map and Statement for that parish.

Herringfleet (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 1 1   Electronic Statement says route ends at St Olaves--Somerleyton Road, but in GIS data route stops at FP 3. The latter would be consistent with the statement for FP 3.

Hollesley (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 29X 1 0 *
FP 59A 1 0 *
RB 59A 0 1 *

Holton (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 8 1 1   Statement says route ends where it meets FP 7, but the line in the GIS data continues SW to the parish boundary, where it joins Halesworth FP 16.

Hopton (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Grid reference "TL 9879/9979" wrong. Possibly part of description missing.

Hoxne (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Electronic Statement says route continues to "Lodge-Eye Road", but route in GIS data stops a junction with FP 4.
FP 4 1 1   Electronic Statement is a duplicate of FP 5, and I don't think either are correct.
FP 5 1 1   Electronic Statement is a duplicate of FP 4, and I don't think either are correct.
FP 8 1 1   Line in GIS data doesn't match Electronic Statement S of the bridge. Statement is consistent with mapped route in OSM. Should "9 metres" be "19 metres"?
FP 9 1 1   Line in GIS data seems to be wrong at the N end. In particular, it doesn't meet up with NCC's line for Brockdish [South Norfolk] FP 17.
FP 10 1 1   Statement says this route joins FP 11. But in GIS data, the FP 11/12 junction is further north.
FP 14 1 1   In Electronic Statement, FP 14/15/16/17 all have the same description. GIS data has distinct routes.
FP 15 1 1   In Electronic Statement, FP 14/15/16/17 all have the same description. GIS data has distinct routes.
FP 16 1 1   In Electronic Statement, FP 14/15/16/17 all have the same description. GIS data has distinct routes.
FP 17 1 1   In Electronic Statement, FP 14/15/16/17 all have the same description. GIS data has distinct routes.
FP 20 1 1   Description duplicated in FP 21. Line in GIS data stops at FP 19, but description implies it continues further north.
FP 21 1 1   First part of description duplicated in FP 20. Line in GIS data only starts at FP 19, but description implies path starts further south.
FP 23 1 1   In the electronic statement the Grid references and perhaps description too are mis-ordered.
BR 29 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement says route terminates at the river, but line in GIS data stops short by 65m.

Icklingham (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 13 0 1   Erroneously still has an entry in the Definitive Statement, but with a blank description.

Ilketshall St Andrew (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   The line in the GIS data stops at TM37508571, rather than continuing to meet Ilketshall St Lawrence FP 13 at TM37438573 on the parish boundary. Statement is unclear.
FP 17 1 1   Added to GIS data and and Electronic Statement 2019-10, but with no description in the latter.

Ilketshall St John (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Statement fails to mention that a section in the middle of this route is recorded at Ilketshall St Andrew FP 15Q.

Ilketshall St Lawrence (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   The description for this route is missing from the Electronic Statement.

Ingham (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 8 1 1   Electronic Statement includes a NW leg that is in Culford Parish, and is shown in the GIS data to be part of Culford FP 3.

Ixworth & Ixworth Thorpe (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2A 1 1   In description, the end point should be FP 3A not FP 1.
BR 4 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is inconsistent with line in GIS data. Former puts path W of (site of) Brewster's Plantation, latter E. GIS line is mapped. Pakenham BR 16 also affected. Presumably there has been a diversion order and the statement hasn't been updated.
FP 5 1 1   Electronic Statement refers to a court order and the stopped up A143, without a proper description.

Kessingland (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 10 1 1   Entry exists in Electronic Statement, but there is no text in the description.
FP 24 1 1   Grid references in the Electronic Statement appear to be correct, but the line in the GIS data is displaced about 10m to the south of where the path should lie.

Lakenheath (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 7 1 1   Definitive statement does not mention the gaps in the route in the GIS data, where it runs along the footway beside a public residential highway.

Lavenham (Babergh)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Statement has erroneously repeated phrase "corner of Bear's Lane approximately 45 metres west north west" and the two grid references shortly afterwards are incorrect. They should be close to TL91854806.
FP 10 1 1   Statement does not mention third limb show in GIS data, which continues to Potland Lane.

Layham (Babergh)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 0 1 *

Little Whelnetham (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Statement says the route goes through the Churchyard. Presumably it hasn't been updated following a diversion.

Little Wratting (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BY 6 1 1   Line in GIS data ends at TL67094686, but the final grid reference given in electronic Statement is TL67014677. The latter corresponds with the original location of the Haverhill parish boundary.

Long Melford (Babergh)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 9 0 1   Listed as FP in Statement, but BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map.
BR 9 1 0   Listed as FP in Statement, but BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map. Short section at southern end in OSM does not follow the Definitive Line.
FP 12 1 1   Statement says route runs from FP 11, but in GIS data it stops short at TL87214731. The GIS data agrees with the definitive map, and it looks like the route of FP 11 was adjusted when the A143 bypass was built. Was the end of FP 12 not moved at the same time to compensate?
BR 15 1 1   Statement is identical for 15 and 15X, covering both routes.
FP 15X 1 1   Statement is identical for 15 and 15X, covering both routes.
FP 21 1 1  

Lound (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 13 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is incorrect, as reference to meeting FP 12B is at the wrong end.
FP 13A 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement includes length of Earth Lane from TM50339878 to TM50139877, which is missing from the GIS data.

Lowestoft (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 18 1 1   The Electronic Statement claims that there is a continuous section from "Hillcrest Drive at OS grid reference 6538629439" to "Spashett Road at OS grid reference 6534729461". The GIS data has three sections between these points. Either the GIS dat is wong is some text has been omitted from the statement.

Mildenhall (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 34 1 1   The electronic Statement says the route goes "about 95 metres in a generally westerly direction". GIS data has a length of 903m in a NW and N direction. GIS data also includes a branch along Jubilee Way, and a Branch crossing the river W of FP 51 where there is no bridge. Also, the join with FP 38 at SE end in the GIS data is not consistent with the grid reference given in the statement for FP 38. Statement and/or GIS data presumably need updating.
FP 38 1 1   In the Statement, the first grid reference (TL7175574125) and the quoted length (118m) are consistent. But in the GIS data, the junction with FP 34 is instead at TL71797412, given a length of only 70m.

Mutford (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement describes combined route of this path and Barnby FP 2.
BR 4 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is identical to that for BR 6, and describes the combined route of both paths.
FP 5 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement describes combined route of this path and Rushmere FP 6A.
BR 6 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is identical to that for BR 4, and describes the combined route of both paths.
FP 10 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement describes combined route of this path and Rushmere FP 3.
BR 11 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement describes combined route of this path and Rushmere FP 2.
FP 12 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is identical to that for FP 15, and describes the combined route of both paths.
BY 13 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is identical for BYs 14, 14 and 16, and FP 17 in this parish. It describes the combined route of these paths, along with that of Rushmere FP 1.
BY 14 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is identical for BYs 14, 14 and 16, and FP 17 in this parish. It describes the combined route of these paths, along with that of Rushmere FP 1.
FP 15 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is identical to that for FP 12, and describes the combined route of both paths.
BY 16 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is identical for BYs 14, 14 and 16, and FP 17 in this parish. It describes the combined route of these paths, along with that of Rushmere FP 1.
FP 17 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is identical for BYs 14, 14 and 16, and FP 17 in this parish. It describes the combined route of these paths, along with that of Rushmere FP 1.

Needham Market (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 22 0 0   New route created due to the diversion of Creeting St Mary FP 39, running from TM08465576 to TM08225589. Should have come in to existance on 2020-01-07 according to https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/assets/Roads-and-transport/public-rights-of-way/Def-Map-Forms-and-Docs/public-notices/CO553-creeting-st-mary-fp39-part-of-gipsy-lane-rail-crossing-diversion-order.pdf but not listed in the GIS data or statement as of 2020-01.
FP 22A 0 0   New route created due to the diversion of Creeting St Mary FP 39, running from TM08225589 to TM08205581. Should have come in to existance on 2020-01-07 according to https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/assets/Roads-and-transport/public-rights-of-way/Def-Map-Forms-and-Docs/public-notices/CO553-creeting-st-mary-fp39-part-of-gipsy-lane-rail-crossing-diversion-order.pdf but not listed in the GIS data or statement as of 2020-01.

North Cove (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 7 1 1   Electronic Statement says route starts from Housing Development, but unclear what happens at North end now because of A146 bypass.
BY 11 1 1   Electronic Statement is clear that route starts from a road. But in GIS data and on the Definitive Map, the route starts at TM46908870 and then runs east. The missing gap is not recorded in Mutford either.

Norton (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 19 1 1   Statement has not been updated following modificaiton orders to shorten its length. The route starts as described, but should now terminate at TL98046632. See statements for new paths 30 to 32.
FP 26Q 1 1   Statement is blank as of 2020-01.

Oakley (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 12 1 1   Description in statement is identical to that for Stuston BR 9, when in fact the route should be partitioned between the two. However the combined length of the two route is only 150m, not 250m as stated in the statement.

Offton (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 29 0 1 *

Onehouse (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 24 1 0 *
BR 53 1 0 *
BR 53O 0 1 *

Oulton (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Statement says that the route "Starts from Gorleston Road" but the line in the GIS data starts about 60m away at TM52709555. The missing link used to be in Lowestoft Parish, and is marked as Lowestoft FP 9 on the Definitive Map and in the GIS data. Presumably the statement is incorrect here.
FP 6 1 1   Statement says that the route "terminate at Gorleston Road", but the line in the GIS data stops about 60m short at TM52469455. Definitive Map shows some evidence of the missing segment being stopped up; presumably when the residential road was built.

Pakenham (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   According to Electronic Statement, this path starts on Ixworth Road, and runs E to Old Hall. In the GIS data, this segment is show as part of FP 3 instead.
FP 3 1 1   According to Electronic Statement, FP starts from FP 2 at Old Hall. In the GIS data, there is an additional segment W to Ixworth Road. This segment should be part of FP 2 instead.
FP 13 1 1   Description in Statement describes whole route from Church Hill to Poplar Farm, most of which is in Thurston Parish (and recorded as FP 9 there). The GIS data only includes the section in Pakenham.
BR 16 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is inconsistent with line in GIS data. (Former site of 'Hungry Hall' is shown on old OS maps, but GIS route does not pass it.) Presumably there has been a diversion order and the statement has not been updated. Ixworth BR 4 also affected.
BR 19 1 1   First grid reference in statement is incorrect: "594,078mE266,211mN" should be "594,178mE266,211mN" i.e. TL9417866211.

Palgrave (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 16 1 1   Electronic Statement says path almost joins FP 13, but in GIS data it gets nowhere near.

Purdis Farm (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Electronic Statement is a duplicate of FP 4. In GIS data section west of Purdis Poppy Farm is FP1, section east is FP 4.
FP 2 1 1   Electronic Statement not consistent with line in GIS data. No FP 27 in Rushmere St Andrew. Possibly modified when Purdis Farm FP 7 added and description not updated?
FP 4 1 1   Electronic Statement is a duplicate of FP 1. In GIS data, section west of Purdis Poppy Farm is FP1, section east is FP 4.

Red Lodge (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 5 1 1   Previously duplicated whole of Freckenham BR 5 in GIS data, but also includes an additional section. Electronic Statement only describes additional northern section.

Redgrave (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Electronic Statements for FP1 and FP2 suggest overlap and are inconsistent with the GIS data.
FP 2 1 1   Electronic Statements for FP1 and FP2 suggest overlap and are inconsistent with the GIS data.
FP 18A 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is for Rickinghall Inferior FP 1A.

Rendlesham (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 1   Included in GIS gata. Appears in Electronic Statement, but without a description.

Rickinghall Superior (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 25 1 1   The GIS data is missing a short SW leg at the southern end to join the end of the path at TM05077477 to the road. Should this be included, or is the gap already a public highway?

Risby (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 8 1 1   Electronic Statement appears to include a length of Welham Lane eastwards to the the Green, whereas the GIS data stops at TL79326635 at the west end of Welham Lane.

Rougham (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Electronic Statement says path meets FP 1, but in GIS data the route stops short at TL91236133 and the continuation is labelled as FP 4.
RB 5 1 1   Statement describes combined route of RB 5 and FP 5X.
FP 5X 1 1   Statement describes combined route of RB 5 and FP 5X.
FP 10 1 1   In the GIS data, the northern end of the route is at TL92876248, which doesn't quite meet with the southern end of Beyton FP 2 at TL92876252. I suspect the GIS data for this route is in error.
FP 23 1 1   Electronic Statement says the route passes E of the site of Rougham Hall, when it actually passes to the west.
FP 24 1 1   In Statement first "progressing east" should be "progressing west". The later, "in an E direction" and "SE" should be "in a W direction" and "SW". Reference to path 27 in Electronic Statement is incorrect (it's located elsewhere). It could be meant to read "crossing path 25" though.

Shadingfield (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 12 1 1   Included in GIS data. Entry in Electronic Statement, but no description as of 2019-01.

Shipmeadow (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 1   Statement is imprecise, and doesn't mention that the route is split into two by a section of BY 17 and FP 18.

South Elmham St Margaret (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 8 1 1   Line in GIS data does not reach the road.

Stanton (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 8 1 1   Upper path within The Grundle. The Statement appears to describe the route all the way to TL97577141, which is duplicating BR 17. The actual path on the ground stops at TL97397234.

Stowmarket (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 1 1   Route listed in Definitive Statement, but there is no description.
FP 8 1 1   GIS data shows the route severed by the A14, and an additional ection added to connect with FP 6 along the sourthern boundary of the A14. But this isn't mentioned in the description in the Statement.
FP 10 1 1   In the GIS data the path ends on Fairfield Hill, rather than joining to Violet Hill Road as specified in the Statement. Also the A45 in the Statement is now the C497 Bury Road.
FP 44 1 1   Reference to Church Road in the statement should not be there.
FP 56 1 1   Statement says it starts at the end of FP 1, but the line in the gIS doesn't join to this.

Stradbroke (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 29 1 1   Electronic Statement does not match GIS data. Says route starts at "Pixey Green Road west of entrance to Whitehouse Farm" -- which would include/duplicate FP28. Should one of FP28 and FP29 include the more direct route to Pixey Green Road?
FP 35 1 1   GIS data includes a separate section, joining FP32 and FP34, which isn't described in the Electronic Statement.
FP 49A 1 1   Listed in Electronic Statement as FP, but with no description.

Stuston (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 9 1 1   Electronic Statement says route is 250m long and part shared with Oakley BR 12. In GIS data, the route is only 73m long. Given position of parish boundary, the GIS data appears to be correct. But total length of two is only 150m.

Sutton (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 17 1 1   17 and 17X have the same description in the Statement, which describes both routes as one.
BY 17X 1 1   17 and 17X have the same description in the Statement, which describes both routes as one.
FP 30 1 1   30 and 30X have the same description in the Statement, which describes both routes as one.
BR 30X 1 1   30 and 30X have the same description in the Statement, which describes both routes as one

Thrandeston (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement has been messed up, presumably following modification order. The current description just describes the three sides of a square at the northern end.

Timworth (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 2 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement doesn't make sense, and neither distance is consistent with the line in the GIS data. Should the first compass direction be north? Should the route run almost due west on the original line of Timworth Lane?

Trimley St Martin (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 0 *
BR 11 0 1 *
FP 28 0 1 *
RB 28 1 0 *

Trimley St Mary (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 22 0 1 *
BR 22 1 0 *
FP 31 0 1 *

Tuddenham St Martin (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 10 0 1 *
BR 10 1 0 *

Tunstall (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 7 1 1   Upgrade to FP 7. Does not yet appear in Electronic Statement as of 2017-06. Statement claims route continues to Sudbourn--Snape road, when it should stop just short at the parish boundary. remainder is Iken RB 3X.
RB 9 1 1   Upgrade to FP 9. Does not yet appear in Electronic Statement as of 2017-06.
FP 22 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is the same for FP22 and FP 23. It covers the route of both paths along with that of Campsea Ash FP 6.
FP 23 1 1   Description in Electronic Statement is the same for FP22 and FP 23. It covers the route of both paths along with that of Campsea Ash FP 6.

Uggeshall (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 1 1   Electronic Statement says path continues past the A12 to join with Wangford FP 2. Route in GIS data stops on the north side of the A12.

Walberswick (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 17 1 0   Shown as RB in GIS data but BY in Electronic Statement as of 2019-01.
BY 17 0 1   Shown as RB in GIS data but BY in Electronic Statement as of 2019-01.
RB 18 1 0   Shown as RB in GIS data but BY in Electronic Statement as of 2019-01.
BY 18 0 1   Shown as RB in GIS data but BY in Electronic Statement as of 2019-01.

Wattisfield (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 6 0 0   Recorded as BR in 2014 Paper Statement, but RB in Electronic Statement and GIS data as of 2019-01.
RB 6 1 1   Recorded as BR in 2014 Paper Statement, but RB in Electronic Statement and GIS data as of 2019-01. Electronic Statement from 2019-01 has the RB 6 as the northern section and BY 6X as the southern section, whereas it is the other way round in the GIS data.
BY 6X 1 1   Electronic Statement from 2019-01 has the BY 6X as the southern section and RB 6 as the northern section, whereas it is the other way round in the GIS data.

Wetheringsett-cum-Brockford (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 26A 1 1   Present in GIS data and in Electronic Statement, but has no description in the latter as of 2019-01.

Whepstead (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5 1 1   Electronic statement says route is about 347m long and ends at TL83675675, which doesn't match GIS data. The extra length is part of FP 6 accordng to the statement.
FP 6 1 1   Electronic Statement says route ends about 70m SE of TL83625681 at a junction with FP 5, which is inconsistent with the GIS data. The missing part is recorded as FP 5 in the GIS data.

Wherstead (Babergh)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 41 1 1   Statement says that the path runs fro the south end of FP 34, but in the GIS data it starts 20m further south at the junction with BR 30. This extra segment is needed to join up the network.

Wickhambrook (West Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BY 31 1 1   GIS data shows S end about 50m north of C-Road though Coltsfoot Green at TL74975552. Is this right, and if so what is the status of the missing link? The Electronic Statement says the route starts from Coltsfoot Green. The name of the C-Road appears to be "Coltsfoot Green".
FP 51 1 1   Grid references in Electronic Statement are incorrect: first should be TL75125404, second should be TL75225400, third should be TL75225397.

Woodbridge (East Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 10X 1 1   Description is a duplicate of FP 10. Unless whether this describes the whole combined route, or just FP 10.
FP 13 1 1   GIS data has an additional section from Fen Meadow to Cumberland Street, which isn't described in the statement.
FP 14 1 1   Description is a duplicate of that for FP 14A, but doesn't make sense. If "FP14" were replaced by "Hasketon FP 21. FP14" then it would be better. But two descriptions still need seperating.
FP 14A 1 1   Description is a duplicate of that for FP 14, but doesn't make sense. If "FP14" were replaced by "Hasketon FP 21. FP14" then it would be better. But two descriptions still need seperating.

Woolverstone (Babergh)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 30 1 0 *

Wortham (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   End of description in Electronic Statement seems wrong. Includes "Terminating Low Road opposite Dash Farm Cottage." -- which is the end of the description for FP 4.
FP 10 1 1   In description, it should be 'eastwards' from Rectory Road.

Wyverstone (Mid Suffolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 28 0 1 *
BR 28 1 0 *