This page lists rigths of way where the mapping status value stored in this tool appears to be inconsistent with what is mapped in OSM (and tagged with a prow_ref=* tag).
No RoWs found with this issue
No RoWs found with this issue
No RoWs found with this issue
| Parish | Number | LGIS | LOSM | ΔL/L | MS | LE | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashby with Oby | BR | 6 | 53 | 202 | +281.1% | 4 | 19m | Statement says route is 203m long, but in GIS data it is only 53m. Definitive map shows longer route, consistent with the Statement, so presumably the GIS data is wrong. |
| Bradwell | FP | 3 | 548 | 320 | −41.6% | 4 | 5y | Definitive Statement records path no 3 as part FP part BR. All recorded as BR in GIS data. Should be split into 3A and 3B. |
| Great Yarmouth | FP | 7a | 449 | 491 | +9.4% | 4 | 3y | On the Definitive Map, the routes of FP 7 and FP 7a as described in the Statement are shown as a single route labelled FP 7. |
| Parish | Number | LGIS | LOSM | ΔL/L | MS | LE | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashby with Oby | BR | 6 | 53 | 202 | +281.1% | 4 | 19m | Statement says route is 203m long, but in GIS data it is only 53m. Definitive map shows longer route, consistent with the Statement, so presumably the GIS data is wrong. |
| Bradwell | FP | 3 | 548 | 320 | −41.6% | 4 | 5y | Definitive Statement records path no 3 as part FP part BR. All recorded as BR in GIS data. Should be split into 3A and 3B. |
No RoWs found with this issue
| Parish | Number | LGIS | LOSM | ΔL/L | MS | LE | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashby with Oby | FP | 4 | 1750 | 1688 | −3.5% | 3 | 7y | |
| Bradwell | FP | 20 | 835 | 831 | −0.5% | 3 | 11m | Possible obsrtuction of Definitive line around sub-station, but alternative route exists. Both Statement and GIS Data have the path going around the north and east side of the sub-station (which is probably inaccessible). But the path on the gound goes to the west and south. Definitive Map is unclear, but probably matches the GIS data. |
| Burgh Castle | FP | 3 | 740 | 712 | −3.8% | 3 | 8m | |
| Caister-on-Sea | FP | 6 | 286 | 292 | +2.1% | 3 | 6y | Mapped route appears to be on wrong side of old railway. It should be on the sea-ward side. |
| Fleggburgh | FP | 8 | 318 | 333 | +4.7% | 3 | 6y | |
| Mautby | FP | 9 | 607 | 600 | −1.2% | 3 | 7y | Mapped route doesn't quite follow the Definitive Line at the east end. |
| Mautby | FP | 14 | 901 | 902 | +0.1% | 3 | 3y | Mapped route does not quite follow the Definitive Line at the SE end. |
| Mautby | FP | 16 | 593 | 595 | +0.3% | 3 | 4y | Definitive Line appears to be obstructed by drainage channel, but bridge nearby provides and alternative route. |
| Mautby | BR | 17 | 644 | 626 | −2.8% | 3 | 4y | Mapped route on modern track doesn't quite follow Definitive Line. |
| Ormesby St Margaret with Scratby | FP | 1 | 832 | 886 | +6.5% | 3 | 6y | |
| Ormesby St Margaret with Scratby | FP | 3 | 310 | 320 | +3.2% | 3 | 5y | There is a kink in Definitive Line in the GIS data near northern end of gaveyard, which is not reflected in the mapped route in OSM. |
| West Caister | FP | 2 | 276 | 301 | +9.1% | 3 | 7y | |
No RoWs found with this issue