Rights of Way in Eastry Rural Parish

Rights of Way in Eastry Rural [TE] (Thanet, Kent)

This page shows a map and table of the Public Rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to All Traffic) in the parish/area of Eastry Rural, in the district of Thanet, in the county of Kent. Data from the Surveying Authority (Kent ) is compared with the data in OpenStreetMap. (more information)

Key to Lines

Rights of Way

: Public Footpath
: Public Bridleway
: Restricted Byway
: Byway Open to All Traffic

Other Highways

: Adopted Footway
: Public Cycleway
: Unclassified Highway

Boundaries

: Parish Boundary

No.	Type	L_GIS	L_OSM	ΔL/L	MS	LE	AE	Z	OT
TE1	FP	2334	2367	+1.4%	—	18m		MZ	OT
TE1A	FP	359	359	+0.0%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE2	FP	226	239	+5.8%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE3	FP	655	679	+3.7%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE3A	FP	894	918	+2.7%	—	4y		MZ	OT
TE4	FP	428	122	−71.5%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE5B	FP	97	95	−2.1%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE6	FP	1856	1888	+1.7%	—	3m	2	MZ	OT
TE7	FP	659	621	−5.8%	—	22m	1	MZ	OT
TE8A	BR	678	662	−2.4%	—	4y		MZ	OT
TE9	BR	4140	2820	−31.9%	—	4y		MZ	OT
TE10	FP	1978	1987	+0.5%	—	4m		MZ	OT
TE11	FP	2149	2144	−0.2%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE12	BR	1137	1094	−3.8%	—	23m		MZ	OT
TE12A	BR	1441	1476	+2.4%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE14	FP	72	79	+9.7%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE16	FP	1431	1450	+1.3%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE18	FP	1598	1602	+0.3%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE20	BR	554	563	+1.6%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE21	BR	720	705	−2.1%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE23	FP	1941	1948	+0.4%	—	3m		MZ	OT
TE24	FP	2134	2175	+1.9%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE25	FP	1962	1957	−0.3%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE26	FP	6774	6746	−0.4%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE27	FP	367	377	+2.7%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE29	BR	607	610	+0.5%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE30	FP	781	773	−1.0%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE31	FP	1399	1390	−0.6%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE32	FP	1885	1874	−0.6%	—	3m		MZ	OT
TE33	FP	631	631	+0.0%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE34	FP	302	303	+0.3%	—	22m		MZ	OT
TE35	RB	410	443	+8.0%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE36	RB	403	406	+0.7%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE37	FP	2899	2924	+0.9%	—	7m		MZ	OT
TE38	FP	628	616	−1.9%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE39	FP	1024	1059	+3.4%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE40	FP	891	895	+0.4%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE189	FP	2824	2819	−0.2%	—	13m	4	MZ	OT
TE194	FP	182	169	−7.1%	—	4y		MZ	OT
TE206	BR	430	408	−5.1%	—	18m		MZ	OT
TE227	FP	97	99	+2.1%	—	4y	1	MZ	OT
TE307	BR	91	96	+5.5%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE383	FP	104	116	+11.5%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE418	FP	121	133	+9.9%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE457	FP	296	307	+3.7%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE458	FP	106	117	+10.4%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE461	FP	194	192	−1.0%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE462	FP	215	216	+0.5%	—	2y		MZ	OT
TE463	FP	55	56	+1.8%	—	2y		MZ	OT
Totals		53159	51725	97.3%

Table Details: To be counted in the table above, OSM ways need to be tagged with an appropriate designation=* tag (one of public_footpath, public_bridleway, restricted_byway, byway_open_to_all_traffic) and the relevant prow_ref=* tag (in the form 'TE12a', where 12 is the route number, and a is an optional suffix letter). The Definitive Statement data and OSM Mapping Statuses have not been imported yet for this parish. This needs to be done manually, and there is no public interface for it yet.

Map Details: On the map, the Yellow (FP), Blue (BR), Magenta (RB) and Red (BY) lines are Rights of Way from official Council data from 2022‑02‑28, licensed under the Open Government Licence (v3) (full copyright details). Routes whose length lines between −5m + 95% and 15m + 105% of the official length are shown with thin lines; the rest are shown with thick lines. The Green lines are different Highways from OSM: Dark Green for unclassified Highways, Blue-Green for Public Cycleways, and Yellow-Green for Adopted Footways. Click on any of these lines for more information. The black lines are approximate modern parish boundaries, constructed by simplifying the polygons in OS Boundary Line. The underlying mapping is OSM Carto (key). Click inside another parish for a link to switch to that parish.

Use of data in OSM: The Rights of Way GIS data shown on the map above is suitably licenced to be used in OpenStreetMap. If doing so, please use the source tag kent_county_council_prow_gis_data. But please do not map Rights of Way just from this data; it is important that OSM reflects what is on the ground as well. Official Rights of Way are not always usable on the ground, and the paths on the ground do not always follow the Definitive Line. The PRoW GIS data (and Definitive Statements, where available and suitably licenced) should be used primarily to add appropriate PRoW tags to ways that have already been mapped from other sources such as aerial imagery (where paths and tracks can clearly been seen) or ground surveys.

Errors and omissions in PRoW tags

OSM ways found in or near the parish with incomplete or contradictory designation=* or prow_ref=* tags. Further details.

Way ID	Issue	prow_ref	designation	L_OSM	JRC
102866260	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	201 m	J+
102866263	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	685 m	J+
102866264	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	10 m	J+
102866265	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	7 m	J+
102866267	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	4316 m	J+
102866271	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	1518 m	J+
102866273	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	7 m	J+
102866274	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	9 m	J+
102866276	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	235 m	J+
102866277	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	8 m	J+
102866281	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	281 m	J+
102866282	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	6 m	J+
121127883	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	8 m	J+
121127893	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	272 m	J+
131346032	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	635 m	J+
131346039	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	6 m	J+
197366575	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	7 m	J+
197366576	Missing prow_ref		public_footpath	998 m	J+
154514770	Designation error	TE32		12 m	J+
905992507	Designation error	TE4		356 m	J+

Errors and omissions in access tags

OSM ways with missing or inconsistent modal access tags are listed below. The classes of Public Rights of Way and Highways included on the map are checked, but Rights of Way with other tagging issues already listed above are excluded. Further details.