You are in: Rob's OSM Stuff » UK PRoW » Progress » Norfolk » Breckland » Hardingham

Rights of Way in Hardingham Parish (Breckland, Norfolk)

This page shows a map and table of the Public Rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to All Traffic) in the parish/area of Hardingham, in the district of Breckland, in the county of Norfolk. Data from the Surveying Authority (Norfolk County Council) is compared with the data in OpenStreetMap. (more information)

Key to Lines

Rights of Way

Public Footpath
Public Bridleway
Restricted Byway
Byway Open to All Traffic

Other Highways

Adopted Footway
Public Cycleway
Unclassified Highway


Parish Boundary

Basemap Lines

See: OSM Carto

OSM Map | Definitive Statement | PRoW GIS Data (GeoJSON)

1 FP 164 170 +3.7% 4 3y   MZ OT TG00NW O Route signed on ground and cut through crop does not lie on definitive line.
2 FP 324 312 −3.7% 4 3y   MZ OT TG00NW O Definitive line obstructed at E end. A stile in the middle is not quite in the right place either.
3 FP 744 776 +4.3% 4 3y   MZ OT TG00NW Unclear which side of hedge S section should run.
4 FP 972 974 +0.2% 4 3y   MZ OT TG00NW
5 FP 685 687 +0.3% 4 3m   MZ OT TG00SW
6 FP 810 838 +3.5% 4 4y   MZ OT TG00SW
7 FP 938 944 +0.6% 4 4m   MZ OT TG00SW
8 FP 201 207 +3.0% 4 4m   MZ OT TG00SW
9 FP 108 126 +16.7% 4 5y   MZ OT TG00SW D Definitive Statement reference to path in Hingham incorrect. In GIS data, why doesn't S end meet with FP 11?
10 FP 659 663 +0.6% 4 4y   MZ OT TG00NE
11 FP 294 278 −5.4% 3 5y   MZ OT TG00SW D In Statement, the reference to Hingham FP 1 should be Hingham FP 2, and no Hingham path at the E end. In GIS data, why doesn't E end meet with FP 9? Also part of the route shown in the GIS data actually belongs to Hingham FP 11.
12 FP 1024 1028 +0.4% 4 5y   MZ OT TG00SW
Totals   6923 7003 101.2%              

Table Details: To be counted in the table above, OSM ways need to be tagged with an appropriate designation=* tag (one of public_footpath, public_bridleway, restricted_byway, byway_open_to_all_traffic) and the relevant prow_ref=* tag (in the form 'Hardingham XX 12a', where XX is one of FP, BR, RB, BY; and 12 is the route number, and a is an optional suffix letter). The Mapping Status values in the table are: −1 Route should not exist; 0 Unverified; 1 Un-mapped; 2 Partially mapped; 3 Complete, but with significant deviation from definitive line; 4 Complete; 5 Complete, with adjacent field boundaries and stiles, gates etc. These values are manually maintained, so my not be up to date.

Map Details: On the map, the Yellow (FP), Blue (BR), Magenta (RB) and Red (BY) lines are Rights of Way from official Council data from 2022‑12‑13, licensed under the Open Government Licence (v3) (full copyright details). Rights of Way with mapping status 4 and 5 are shown with thin lines, others are show with thick lines. The Green lines are different Highways from OSM: Dark Green for unclassified Highways, Blue-Green for Public Cycleways, and Yellow-Green for Adopted Footways. Click on any of these lines for more information. The black lines are approximate modern parish boundaries, constructed by simplifying the polygons in OS Boundary Line. The underlying mapping is OSM Carto (key). Click inside another parish for a link to switch to that parish.

Use of data in OSM: The Rights of Way GIS data shown on the map above is suitably licenced to be used in OpenStreetMap. If doing so, please use the source tag norfolk_county_council_prow_gis_data. But please do not map Rights of Way just from this data; it is important that OSM reflects what is on the ground as well. Official Rights of Way are not always usable on the ground, and the paths on the ground do not always follow the Definitive Line. The PRoW GIS data (and Definitive Statements, where available and suitably licenced) should be used primarily to add appropriate PRoW tags to ways that have already been mapped from other sources such as aerial imagery (where paths and tracks can clearly been seen) or ground surveys.

Errors and omissions in PRoW tags

OSM ways found in or near the parish with incomplete or contradictory designation=* or prow_ref=* tags. Further details.

Way ID Issue prow_ref designation LOSM OSM Note Tag OSM Fixme Tag JRC
426534080 Missing prow_ref public_footpath 199 m Signed as Public Footpath from wester end and path cut through crop, but not on Definitive Line. J+

Errors and omissions in access tags

OSM ways with missing or inconsistent modal access tags are listed below. The classes of Public Rights of Way and Highways included on the map are checked, but Rights of Way with other tagging issues already listed above are excluded. Further details.

No issues found in this parish.

Parish ID: 39. OSM data last refreshed: 2023-09-12 07:41:02 Z.