This page shows a map and table of the Public Rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to All Traffic) in the parish/area of Burston, in the district of South Norfolk, in the county of Norfolk. Data from the Surveying Authority (Norfolk County Council) is compared with the data in OpenStreetMap. (more information)
See: OSM Carto
OSM Map | Definitive Statement | PRoW GIS Data (GeoJSON) | OSM Highways (GeoJSON)
| No. | Type | DS | LGIS | LOSM | ΔL/L | MS | LE | AE | Z | OT | DM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FP | ✓ | 559 | 54 | −90.3% | 2 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 2 | FP | ✓ | 176 | 198 | +12.5% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 3 | FP | ✓ | 252 | 259 | +2.8% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 4 | FP | ✓ | 211 | 211 | +0.0% | 4 | 8y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 5 | FP | ✓ | — | 0 | — | — | OT | D Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as BR on Definitive Map and in GIS data, and referred to as such from other RoW Statements. | ||||
| 5 | BR | ✕ | 1013 | 1027 | +1.4% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | D Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as BR on Definitive Map and in GIS data, and referred to as such from other RoW Statements. | |
| 6 | FP | ✓ | 752 | 772 | +2.7% | 4 | 6y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 7 | FP | ✓ | 424 | 426 | +0.5% | 4 | 6y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 9 | FP | ✓ | 410 | 407 | −0.7% | 4 | 8y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 10 | FP | ✓ | 648 | 650 | +0.3% | 4 | 8y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 11 | FP | ✓ | 879 | 869 | −1.1% | 4 | 8y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 12 | FP | ✓ | 566 | 569 | +0.5% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | D The 'Back Lane' referred to in the statement is presumably the U76203 Common Road. | |
| 13 | FP | ✓ | 683 | 686 | +0.4% | 3 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 14 | FP | ✓ | 869 | 915 | +5.3% | 3 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 15 | FP | ✓ | 479 | 485 | +1.3% | 4 | 4y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 15a | FP | ✓ | 399 | 402 | +0.8% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 16 | FP | ✓ | 784 | 795 | +1.4% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SE | ||
| 17 | FP | ✓ | 344 | 347 | +0.9% | 4 | 20m | MZ | OT | TM18SE | O Route available on the ground deviates from the Definitive line at the southern end. | |
| 18 | FP | ✓ | 507 | 509 | +0.4% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SE | ||
| 19 | FP | ✓ | 230 | 248 | +7.8% | 4 | 18m | MZ | OT | TM18SE | ||
| 20 | FP | ✓ | 336 | 341 | +1.5% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SE | ||
| 21 | FP | ✓ | 902 | 909 | +0.8% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SE | ||
| 22 | FP | ✓ | 1213 | 696 | −42.6% | 2 | 6y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 23 | FP | ✓ | 859 | 867 | +0.9% | 4 | 6y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | D There is an erroneous repetition of "Footpath No. 24 to join the northern end of" in the Definitive Statement. | |
| 24 | FP | ✓ | 232 | 196 | −15.5% | 3 | 6y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 25 | FP | ✓ | 761 | 778 | +2.2% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 26 | FP | ✓ | 372 | 373 | +0.3% | 4 | 6y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 27 | FP | ✓ | 484 | 491 | +1.4% | 4 | 4y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | D Reference in Statement to FP 2 should be FP 25. | |
| 28 | FP | ✓ | 384 | 389 | +1.3% | 3 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | O Mapped route does not follow the Definitive Line from the GIS data, near the Western end. But it's unclear if the Definitive Line has been blocked by new houses. Should the route be diverted? | |
| 29 | FP | ✓ | 290 | 299 | +3.1% | 3 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | O Route on ground does not follow the Definitive Line. | |
| 30 | FP | ✓ | 313 | 314 | +0.3% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 31 | FP | ✓ | 699 | 709 | +1.4% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | Mapped line in OSM not quite right at Level Crossing, but this may be a problem with the GIS data. | |
| 32 | FP | ✓ | 980 | 996 | +1.6% | 3 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 33 | FP | ✓ | 1118 | 1122 | +0.4% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 34 | FP | ✓ | 958 | 956 | −0.2% | 4 | 6y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 35 | FP | ✓ | 711 | 717 | +0.8% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | D The U76203 is actually called Common Road according to the List of Streets. | |
| 36 | BY | ✓ | 1492 | 1500 | +0.5% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SE | ||
| 37 | BR | ✓ | 152 | 165 | +8.6% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SE | ||
| 38 | FP | ✓ | 611 | 608 | −0.5% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 39 | FP | ✓ | 171 | 174 | +1.8% | 4 | 4y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 40 | FP | ✓ | 310 | 317 | +2.3% | 3 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | O Route on ground at southern end does not follow the Definitive Line. | |
| 41 | BR | ✓ | 534 | 519 | −2.8% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 42 | BR | ✓ | 521 | 518 | −0.6% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| Totals | 24588 | 23783 | 96.7% | |||||||||
Table Details: To be counted in the table above, OSM ways need to be tagged with an appropriate designation=* tag (one of public_footpath, public_bridleway, restricted_byway, byway_open_to_all_traffic) and the relevant prow_ref=* tag (in the form 'Burston XX 12a', where XX is one of FP, BR, RB, BY; and 12 is the route number, and a is an optional suffix letter). The Mapping Status values in the table are: −1 Route should not exist; 0 Unverified; 1 Un-mapped; 2 Partially mapped; 3 Complete, but with significant deviation from definitive line; 4 Complete; 5 Complete, with adjacent field boundaries and stiles, gates etc. These values are manually maintained, so my not be up to date.
Map Details: On the map, the Yellow (FP), Blue (BR), Magenta (RB) and Red (BY) lines are Rights of Way from official Council data from 2022‑12‑13, licensed under the Open Government Licence (v3) (full copyright details). Rights of Way with mapping status 4 and 5 are shown with thin lines, others are show with thick lines. The Green lines are different Highways from OSM: Dark Green for unclassified Highways, Blue-Green for Public Cycleways, and Yellow-Green for Adopted Footways. Click on any of these lines for more information. The black lines are approximate modern parish boundaries, constructed by simplifying the polygons in OS Boundary Line. The underlying mapping is OSM Carto (key). Click inside another parish for a link to switch to that parish.
Use of data in OSM: The Rights of Way GIS data shown on the map above is suitably licenced to be used in OpenStreetMap. If doing so, please use the source tag norfolk_county_council_prow_gis_data. But please do not map Rights of Way just from this data; it is important that OSM reflects what is on the ground as well. Official Rights of Way are not always usable on the ground, and the paths on the ground do not always follow the Definitive Line. The PRoW GIS data (and Definitive Statements, where available and suitably licenced) should be used primarily to add appropriate PRoW tags to ways that have already been mapped from other sources such as aerial imagery (where paths and tracks can clearly been seen) or ground surveys.
OSM ways found in or near the parish with incomplete or contradictory designation=* or prow_ref=* tags. Further details.
| Way ID | Issue | prow_ref | designation | LOSM | OSM Note Tag | OSM Fixme Tag | JRC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 740123361 | Missing prow_ref | public_footpath | 117 m | Designation by virtue of official Public Footpath fingerpost at road. However, not recorded as such in Definitive Map and Statement. However, it almost certianly should be recorded as it's the natural continuation of Diss FP 7. | J+ | ||
| 867001964 | Missing prow_ref | public_footpath | 116 m | Designation by virture of official sign at road. | J+ |
OSM ways with missing or inconsistent modal access tags are listed below. The classes of Public Rights of Way and Highways included on the map are checked, but Rights of Way with other tagging issues already listed above are excluded. Further details.