You are in: Rob's OSM Stuff » UK PRoW » Progress » Norfolk » South Norfolk » Carleton Rode

Rights of Way in Carleton Rode Parish (South Norfolk, Norfolk)

This page shows a map and table of the Public Rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to All Traffic) in the parish/area of Carleton Rode, in the district of South Norfolk, in the county of Norfolk. Data from the Surveying Authority (Norfolk County Council) is compared with the data in OpenStreetMap. (more information)

Key to Lines

Rights of Way

Public Footpath
Public Bridleway
Restricted Byway
Byway Open to All Traffic

Other Highways

Adopted Footway
Public Cycleway
Unclassified Highway


Parish Boundary

Basemap Lines

See: OSM Carto

OSM Map | Definitive Statement | PRoW GIS Data (GeoJSON) | OSM Highways (GeoJSON)

1 FP 534 546 +2.2% 4 5y   MZ OT TM19SW
2 FP 519 524 +1.0% 4 7y   MZ OT TM19SW
3 FP 605 11 −98.2% 2 10y   MZ OT TM19SW
4 FP 869 866 −0.3% 4 6y   MZ OT TM19SW
5 FP 402 403 +0.2% 4 7y   MZ OT TM19SW
6 FP 514 508 −1.2% 4 7y   MZ OT TM19SW
7 FP 318 323 +1.6% 4 7y   MZ OT TM19SW
8 FP 616 622 +1.0% 4 15m   MZ OT TM19SW
9 FP 1250 1258 +0.6% 4 6y   MZ OT TM19SW D In the statement, is a sentence and another grid reference missing before the first grid reference?
11 FP 1047 1093 +4.4% 4 6y   MZ OT TM19SW
12 FP 958 865 −9.7% 2 5y   MZ OT TM19SW O Route probably obstructed at eastern end; alternative route available on ground.
13 FP 464 466 +0.4% 4 7y   MZ OT TM19SW
14 FP 746 752 +0.8% 4 7y   MZ OT TM19SW D O First GR and line in GIS data doesn't match path and bridge on ground. "Footpath 9" in Statement title wrong.
15 FP 1467 1466 −0.1% 4 7y   MZ OT TM19SW
16 FP 1055 1087 +3.0% 4 6y   MZ OT TM19SW Question over which side of stream on one section.
17 FP 1020 1038 +1.8% 4 6y   MZ OT TM19SW
18 FP 138 146 +5.8% 4 7y   MZ OT TM19SW
19 FP 145 161 +11.0% 4 7y   MZ OT TM19SW
21 FP 663 673 +1.5% 4 7y   MZ OT TM19SW
22 FP 296 300 +1.4% 4 9y   MZ OT TM19SW O Path impassible due to lack of bridge over ditch at TM11749133.
23 FP 115 109 −5.2% 4 10y   MZ OT TM19SW
24 FP 227 227 +0.0% 4 5y   MZ OT TM19SW
25 FP 1007 953 −5.4% 2 6y   MZ OT TM19SW Short missing section in OSM by house. Needs ground survey.
26 FP 422 427 +1.2% 4 7y   MZ OT TM19SW
27 FP 497 500 +0.6% 4 5y   MZ OT TM19SW
28 FP 572 561 −1.9% 4 4y   MZ OT TM19SW
29 FP 167 177 +6.0% 4 7y   MZ OT TM09SE
Totals   16633 16062 96.6%              

Table Details: To be counted in the table above, OSM ways need to be tagged with an appropriate designation=* tag (one of public_footpath, public_bridleway, restricted_byway, byway_open_to_all_traffic) and the relevant prow_ref=* tag (in the form 'Carleton Rode XX 12a', where XX is one of FP, BR, RB, BY; and 12 is the route number, and a is an optional suffix letter). The Mapping Status values in the table are: −1 Route should not exist; 0 Unverified; 1 Un-mapped; 2 Partially mapped; 3 Complete, but with significant deviation from definitive line; 4 Complete; 5 Complete, with adjacent field boundaries and stiles, gates etc. These values are manually maintained, so my not be up to date.

Map Details: On the map, the Yellow (FP), Blue (BR), Magenta (RB) and Red (BY) lines are Rights of Way from official Council data from 2022‑12‑13, licensed under the Open Government Licence (v3) (full copyright details). Rights of Way with mapping status 4 and 5 are shown with thin lines, others are show with thick lines. The Green lines are different Highways from OSM: Dark Green for unclassified Highways, Blue-Green for Public Cycleways, and Yellow-Green for Adopted Footways. Click on any of these lines for more information. The black lines are approximate modern parish boundaries, constructed by simplifying the polygons in OS Boundary Line. The underlying mapping is OSM Carto (key). Click inside another parish for a link to switch to that parish.

Use of data in OSM: The Rights of Way GIS data shown on the map above is suitably licenced to be used in OpenStreetMap. If doing so, please use the source tag norfolk_county_council_prow_gis_data. But please do not map Rights of Way just from this data; it is important that OSM reflects what is on the ground as well. Official Rights of Way are not always usable on the ground, and the paths on the ground do not always follow the Definitive Line. The PRoW GIS data (and Definitive Statements, where available and suitably licenced) should be used primarily to add appropriate PRoW tags to ways that have already been mapped from other sources such as aerial imagery (where paths and tracks can clearly been seen) or ground surveys.

Errors and omissions in PRoW tags

OSM ways found in or near the parish with incomplete or contradictory designation=* or prow_ref=* tags. Further details.

No issues found in this parish.

Errors and omissions in access tags

OSM ways with missing or inconsistent modal access tags are listed below. The classes of Public Rights of Way and Highways included on the map are checked, but Rights of Way with other tagging issues already listed above are excluded. Further details.

No issues found in this parish.

Parish ID: 436. OSM data last refreshed: 2023-09-29 07:57:26 Z.