This page shows a map and table of the Public Rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to All Traffic) in the parish/area of Diss, in the district of South Norfolk, in the county of Norfolk. Data from the Surveying Authority (Norfolk County Council) is compared with the data in OpenStreetMap. (more information)
See: OSM Carto
OSM Map | Definitive Statement | PRoW GIS Data (GeoJSON) | OSM Highways (GeoJSON)
| No. | Type | DS | LGIS | LOSM | ΔL/L | MS | LE | AE | Z | OT | DM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | RB | ✓ | 785 | 833 | +6.1% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 3 | RB | ✓ | 1031 | 1025 | −0.6% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 4 | FP | ✓ | 896 | 915 | +2.1% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 5 | BR | ✓ | 570 | 579 | +1.6% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | N Unclear why this is a Bridleway, as it doesn't connect with any other routes with equestrian or cycle rights. The Statement for this route suggests Winfarthing FP 26 should also be a bridleway. | |
| 6 | FP | ✓ | 284 | 281 | −1.1% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 7 | FP | ✓ | 410 | 405 | −1.2% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | N The continuation of the track in Tibernham Parish from the eastern end of FP7 at TM12708733 to the public road Heywood End at TM12808733 is not recorded as a Highway of Public Right of Way. This makes the eastern end of this route a dead end. | |
| 8 | FP | ✓ | 660 | 296 | −55.2% | 2 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 9 | FP | ✓ | 1315 | 1108 | −15.7% | 2 | 7y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 10 | BR | ✓ | 239 | 244 | +2.1% | 4 | 4y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 11 | FP | ✓ | 220 | 231 | +5.0% | 3 | 7y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | O Unclear how path joins track at E end. Line in GIS data shows it passing through buildings. | |
| 12 | FP | ✓ | 363 | 317 | −12.7% | 2 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 13 | FP | ✓ | 314 | 320 | +1.9% | 4 | 4y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 14 | BR | ✓ | 538 | 535 | −0.6% | 4 | 7y | MZ | OT | TM18NW | ||
| 15 | BR | ✓ | 781 | 778 | −0.4% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 17 | FP | ✓ | 472 | 465 | −1.5% | 4 | 5y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 18 | FP | ✓ | 361 | 368 | +1.9% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 19 | FP | ✓ | 1057 | 1077 | +1.9% | 3 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 20 | FP | ✓ | 467 | 450 | −3.6% | 3 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 22 | FP | ✓ | 1241 | 1250 | +0.7% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 24 | FP | ✓ | 711 | 726 | +2.1% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | D In Statement, "eastwards" should be "westwards". | |
| 25 | RB | ✓ | 598 | 600 | +0.3% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | N Definitive Statement says section north of FP26 is only open to Pedestrian Traffic. Unclear how this is effected though, possibly through a TRO. | |
| 26 | FP | ✓ | 428 | 427 | −0.2% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 27 | FP | ✓ | 587 | 618 | +5.3% | 3 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 28 | RB | ✓ | 906 | 904 | −0.2% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 30 | FP | ✓ | 291 | 0 | — | 1 | MZ | OT | TM18SW | N Runs from TM13738139 to TM13968144, but neither end is connected to another recorded highway or public right of way. Definitive statement says that he path continues in Depwade Rural District, but there's nothing recorded there in Scole parish. | ||
| 32 | FP | ✓ | 552 | 645 | +16.8% | 3 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | Southern part of route signposted on the ground does not match the Definitive Line. | |
| 33 | FP | ✓ | 193 | 200 | +3.6% | 4 | 3m | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 34 | FP | ✓ | 423 | 430 | +1.7% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM17NW | ||
| 36 | FP | ✓ | 165 | 166 | +0.6% | 4 | 2m | MZ | OT | TM17NW | ||
| 37 | FP | ✓ | 492 | 463 | −5.9% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 38 | RB | ✓ | 413 | 421 | +1.9% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 39 | FP | ✓ | 246 | 241 | −2.0% | 4 | 19m | MZ | OT | TM17NW | D O Definitive Line is obsructed by toilet block, but it's easy enough to go round. Definitive Statement has FP 39 and FP 40 the other way round to the GIS data and the Definitive Map. | |
| 40 | FP | ✓ | 243 | 252 | +3.7% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM17NW | D Definitive Statement has FP 39 and FP 40 the other way round to the GIS data and the Definitive Map. | |
| 41 | FP | ✓ | 119 | 126 | +5.9% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| 42 | BR | ✓ | 287 | 289 | +0.7% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | TM18SW | ||
| Totals | 18658 | 17985 | 96.4% | |||||||||
Table Details: To be counted in the table above, OSM ways need to be tagged with an appropriate designation=* tag (one of public_footpath, public_bridleway, restricted_byway, byway_open_to_all_traffic) and the relevant prow_ref=* tag (in the form 'Diss XX 12a', where XX is one of FP, BR, RB, BY; and 12 is the route number, and a is an optional suffix letter). The Mapping Status values in the table are: −1 Route should not exist; 0 Unverified; 1 Un-mapped; 2 Partially mapped; 3 Complete, but with significant deviation from definitive line; 4 Complete; 5 Complete, with adjacent field boundaries and stiles, gates etc. These values are manually maintained, so my not be up to date.
Map Details: On the map, the Yellow (FP), Blue (BR), Magenta (RB) and Red (BY) lines are Rights of Way from official Council data from 2022‑12‑13, licensed under the Open Government Licence (v3) (full copyright details). Rights of Way with mapping status 4 and 5 are shown with thin lines, others are show with thick lines. The Green lines are different Highways from OSM: Dark Green for unclassified Highways, Blue-Green for Public Cycleways, and Yellow-Green for Adopted Footways. Click on any of these lines for more information. The black lines are approximate modern parish boundaries, constructed by simplifying the polygons in OS Boundary Line. The underlying mapping is OSM Carto (key). Click inside another parish for a link to switch to that parish.
Use of data in OSM: The Rights of Way GIS data shown on the map above is suitably licenced to be used in OpenStreetMap. If doing so, please use the source tag norfolk_county_council_prow_gis_data. But please do not map Rights of Way just from this data; it is important that OSM reflects what is on the ground as well. Official Rights of Way are not always usable on the ground, and the paths on the ground do not always follow the Definitive Line. The PRoW GIS data (and Definitive Statements, where available and suitably licenced) should be used primarily to add appropriate PRoW tags to ways that have already been mapped from other sources such as aerial imagery (where paths and tracks can clearly been seen) or ground surveys.
OSM ways found in or near the parish with incomplete or contradictory designation=* or prow_ref=* tags. Further details.
| Way ID | Issue | prow_ref | designation | LOSM | OSM Note Tag | OSM Fixme Tag | JRC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 108343459 | Missing prow_ref | public_footpath | 15 m | Bypass for Ford on Restricted Byway. This route does not seem to be recorded as a Public Right of Way, but there is a Norfolk County Council public footpath signpost present indicating it is. | J+ | ||
| 148702658 | Missing prow_ref | public_footpath | 98 m | Norfolk County Council signpost on ground indicates this is a public footpath. | J+ | ||
| 740123361 | Missing prow_ref | public_footpath | 117 m | Designation by virtue of official Public Footpath fingerpost at road. However, not recorded as such in Definitive Map and Statement. However, it almost certianly should be recorded as it's the natural continuation of Diss FP 7. | J+ | ||
| 860321020 | Missing prow_ref | public_footpath | 175 m | Definitive Line of Shelfanger FP 8, but not the route that's been mapped. | Check accessibility on ground | J+ | |
| 392759530 | No highway tag | Diss␣FP␣9 | public_footpath | 13 m | Definitive line of footpath | check if you can cross the ditch here or not | J+ |
OSM ways with missing or inconsistent modal access tags are listed below. The classes of Public Rights of Way and Highways included on the map are checked, but Rights of Way with other tagging issues already listed above are excluded. Further details.