You are in: Rob's OSM Stuff » UK PRoW » Progress » Suffolk » East Suffolk » Framlingham

Rights of Way in Framlingham Parish (East Suffolk, Suffolk)

This page shows a map and table of the Public Rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to All Traffic) in the parish/area of Framlingham, in the district of East Suffolk, in the county of Suffolk. Data from the Surveying Authority (Suffolk County Council) is compared with the data in OpenStreetMap. (more information)

OSM Map | Definitive Statement | PRoW GIS Data (GeoJSON) | OSM Highways (GeoJSON)

No. Type DS LGIS LOSM ΔL/L MS LE AE Z OT DM Notes
1 FP ✓ 486 182 −62.6% 2 2y   MZ OT
2 FP ✓ 1524 1539 +1.0% 4 10m   MZ OT D Description in Statement says route ends at Earl Soham FP 3. But that path does not exist, and the route in the GIS data does not go to the Earl Soham parish boundary.
3 BR ✓ 394 387 −1.8% 4 2y   MZ OT
4 FP ✓ 496 505 +1.8% 4 13m   MZ OT
5 FP ✓ 604 596 −1.3% 4 2y   MZ OT
6 FP ✓ 591 413 −30.1% 2 2y   MZ OT
7 FP ✓ 273 282 +3.3% 4 2y   MZ OT
8 FP ✓ 646 674 +4.3% 4 2y   MZ OT
9 FP ✓ 1045 1051 +0.6% 4 2y   MZ OT
10 FP ✓ 155 0 — 1     MZ OT
11 FP ✓ 1153 1151 −0.2% 4 2y   MZ OT
12 FP ✓ 1047 1049 +0.2% 3 2y   MZ OT
14 FP ✓ 713 85 −88.1% 2 2y   MZ OT
15 FP ✓ 532 190 −64.3% 2 2y   MZ OT
16 FP ✓ 239 0 — 1     MZ OT
17 FP ✓ 411 273 −33.6% 2 2y   MZ OT
18 FP ✓ 199 208 +4.5% 4 13m   MZ OT
19 FP ✓ 1135 412 −63.7% 2 2y   MZ OT
20 FP ✓ 242 0 — 1     MZ OT
21 FP ✓ 281 0 — 1     MZ OT
22 FP ✓ 531 16 −97.0% 2 2y   MZ OT
23 FP ✓ 312 15 −95.2% 2 2y   MZ OT
24 FP ✓ 484 346 −28.5% 2 2y   MZ OT
25 FP ✓ 216 0 — 1     MZ OT
26 FP ✓ 2390 484 −79.7% 2 2y   MZ OT
27 FP ✓ 915 25 −97.3% 2 2y   MZ OT
28 FP ✓ 230 0 — 1     MZ OT
29 FP ✓ 1024 28 −97.3% 2 2y   MZ OT
30 FP ✓ 843 754 −10.6% 4 3w   MZ OT
31 FP ✓ 377 374 −0.8% 4 2y   MZ OT
32 FP ✓ — 0 — —       OT D Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as FP in Statement but BR on Definitive Map.
32 BR ✕ 1458 1446 −0.8% 4 2y   MZ OT D Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as FP in Statement but BR on Definitive Map.
33 FP ✓ 812 799 −1.6% 4 2y   MZ OT
34 FP ✓ 799 817 +2.3% 4 2y   MZ OT
35 FP ✓ 455 449 −1.3% 4 2y   MZ OT
36 FP ✓ 572 577 +0.9% 4 2y   MZ OT
37 FP ✓ 501 504 +0.6% 4 2y   MZ OT
38 FP ✓ 858 856 −0.2% 4 2y   MZ OT
39 FP ✓ 148 156 +5.4% 4 2y   MZ OT
40 FP ✓ 422 0 — 1     MZ OT
41 FP ✓ 95 105 +10.5% 4 13m   MZ OT
42 FP ✓ 590 596 +1.0% 4 2y   MZ OT
43 BR ✓ 491 0 — 1     MZ OT
44 FP ✓ 570 578 +1.4% 4 2y   MZ OT
45 FP ✓ 321 338 +5.3% 4 3m   MZ OT
46 FP ✓ 294 297 +1.0% 4 2y   MZ OT
47 FP ✓ 1275 0 — 1     MZ OT
48 BR ✓ 1070 118 −89.0% 2 2y   MZ OT
50 FP ✓ 1375 150 −89.1% 2 2y   MZ OT
51 FP ✓ 1196 1131 −5.4% 4 2y   MZ OT
52 FP ✓ 260 268 +3.1% 4 2y   MZ OT
53 FP ✓ 742 0 — 1     MZ OT
54 FP ✓ 473 489 +3.4% 4 2y   MZ OT
54A FP ✓ 290 0 — 1     MZ OT
55 FP ✓ 862 0 — 1     MZ OT
56 FP ✓ 346 0 — 1     MZ OT
57 FP ✓ 353 0 — 1     MZ OT
58 FP ✓ 51 51 +0.0% 4 2y   MZ OT
59 FP ✓ 910 0 — 1     MZ OT
60 FP ✓ 214 70 −67.3% 2 2y   MZ OT
61 FP ✓ 218 230 +5.5% 4 23m   MZ OT
62 FP ✓ 124 0 — 1     MZ OT
63 FP ✓ 366 369 +0.8% 4 2y   MZ OT D Description in Statement has not been updated to account fro BR 63A, which now follows the second half of this route.
63A BR ✓ 350 370 +5.7% 4 2y   MZ OT
64 FP ✓ 119 124 +4.2% 4 2y   MZ OT D Description in Statement as of 2019-01 is actually the corrected description for FP 63.
65 FP ✓ 641 0 — 1     MZ OT
66 BR ✓ 696 704 +1.1% 4 2y   MZ OT N No continuation for non-pedestrian users at eastern end.
67 FP ✓ 357 364 +2.0% 4 2y   MZ OT
68 FP ✓ 882 0 — 1     MZ OT
69 FP ✓ 862 225 −73.9% 2 2y   MZ OT
70 FP ✓ 572 0 — 1     MZ OT
71 FP ✓ 574 577 +0.5% 4 2y   MZ OT
72 FP ✓ 488 490 +0.4% 4 2y   MZ OT
73 FP ✓ 931 930 −0.1% 4 9m   MZ OT
74 FP ✓ 364 371 +1.9% 4 2y   MZ OT
75 FP ✓ 443 438 −1.1% 4 2y   MZ OT
76 FP ✓ 123 0 — 1     MZ OT
77 FP ✓ 653 683 +4.6% 4 2y   MZ OT
78 FP ✓ 606 607 +0.2% 4 2y   MZ OT
79 FP ✓ 336 344 +2.4% 4 2y   MZ OT
80 FP ✓ 297 0 — 1     MZ OT
81 FP ✓ 545 0 — 1     MZ OT D Description in Statement is for combined FP 81 and BR 81X routes, without distinguishing them.
81X BR ✓ 514 500 −2.7% 4 2y   MZ OT D Description in Statement is for combined FP 81 and BR 81X routes, without distinguishing them.
82 FP ✓ 58 0 — 1     MZ OT
83 FP ✓ 346 0 — 1     MZ OT
84 FP ✓ 126 0 — 1     MZ OT
86 FP ✓ — 0 — —       OT D Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as FP in Statement but BR on Definitive Map.
86 BR ✕ 268 168 −37.3% 2 12m   MZ OT D Anomaly in DM&S known to SCC: Appears as FP in Statement but BR on Definitive Map.
87 FP ✓ 424 414 −2.4% 4 2y   MZ OT
88 FP ✓ 568 578 +1.8% 4 2y   MZ OT
89 FP ✓ 623 616 −1.1% 4 2y   MZ OT
90 FP ✓ 506 537 +6.1% 2 22m   MZ OT Mapped route has a small gap near the northern end. It's not clear how the paths should join up across the stream/ditch. Needs a ground survey.
91 FP ✓ 473 476 +0.6% 4 2y   MZ OT
92 FP ✓ 144 156 +8.3% 4 2y   MZ OT
93 BR ✓ 1086 1084 −0.2% 4 19m   MZ OT
95 FP ✓ 1305 1304 −0.1% 4 2y   MZ OT
96 FP ✓ 30 35 +16.7% 4 2y   MZ OT
98 FP ✓ 86 0 — 1     MZ OT
99 FP ✓ 9 12 +33.3% 4 22m   MZ OT
Totals   54404 33540 61.6%              

Table Details: To be counted in the table above, OSM ways need to be tagged with an appropriate designation=* tag (one of public_footpath, public_bridleway, restricted_byway, byway_open_to_all_traffic) and the relevant prow_ref=* tag (in the form 'Framlingham XX 12a', where XX is one of FP, BR, RB, BY; and 12 is the route number, and a is an optional suffix letter). The Mapping Status values in the table are: −1 Route should not exist; 0 Unverified; 1 Un-mapped; 2 Partially mapped; 3 Complete, but with significant deviation from definitive line; 4 Complete; 5 Complete, with adjacent field boundaries and stiles, gates etc. These values are manually maintained, so my not be up to date.

Map Details: On the map, the Yellow (FP), Blue (BR), Magenta (RB) and Red (BY) lines are Rights of Way from official Council data from 2021‑07‑06, licensed under the Open Government Licence (v3) (full copyright details). Rights of Way with mapping status 4 and 5 are shown with thin lines, others are show with thick lines. The Green lines are different Highways from OSM: Dark Green for unclassified Highways, Blue-Green for Public Cycleways, and Yellow-Green for Adopted Footways. Click on any of these lines for more information. The black lines are approximate modern parish boundaries, constructed by simplifying the polygons in OS Boundary Line. The underlying mapping is OSM Carto (key). Click inside another parish for a link to switch to that parish.

Use of data in OSM: The Rights of Way GIS data shown on the map above is suitably licenced to be used in OpenStreetMap. If doing so, please use the source tag suffolk_county_council_prow_gis_data. But please do not map Rights of Way just from this data; it is important that OSM reflects what is on the ground as well. Official Rights of Way are not always usable on the ground, and the paths on the ground do not always follow the Definitive Line. The PRoW GIS data (and Definitive Statements, where available and suitably licenced) should be used primarily to add appropriate PRoW tags to ways that have already been mapped from other sources such as aerial imagery (where paths and tracks can clearly been seen) or ground surveys.

Errors and omissions in PRoW tags

OSM ways found in or near the parish with incomplete or contradictory designation=* or prow_ref=* tags. Further details.

Way ID Issue prow_ref designation LOSM OSM Note Tag OSM Fixme Tag JRC
666416683 Missing prow_ref public_footpath 11 m J+
702375691 No highway tag Framlingham␣FP␣6 public_footpath 172 m Check on ground J+

Errors and omissions in access tags

OSM ways with missing or inconsistent modal access tags are listed below. The classes of Public Rights of Way and Highways included on the map are checked, but Rights of Way with other tagging issues already listed above are excluded. Further details.

No issues found in this parish.

Parish ID: 699. OSM data last refreshed: 2021-07-30 14:00:13 Z.