You are in: Rob's OSM Stuff » UK PRoW » Progress » Suffolk » Mid Suffolk » Creeting St Mary

Rights of Way in Creeting St Mary Parish (Mid Suffolk, Suffolk)

This page shows a map and table of the Public Rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to All Traffic) in the parish/area of Creeting St Mary, in the district of Mid Suffolk, in the county of Suffolk. Data from the Surveying Authority (Suffolk County Council) is compared with the data in OpenStreetMap. (more information)

OSM Map | Definitive Statement | PRoW GIS Data (GeoJSON)

1 FP 243 252 +3.7% 3 17m   MZ OT Mapped route does not quite follow the definitive line.
2 FP 124 130 +4.8% 4 5m   MZ OT
3 FP 460 457 −0.7% 4 5m   MZ OT D Both grid references have the 2nd and 3rd pairs of digits interchanged. They should be TM08955622 and TM08685602.
4 FP 656 697 +6.2% 4 17m   MZ OT N Unclear what crossing facilities are available at the A14.
5 FP 359 371 +3.3% 4 17m   MZ OT D Love Lane = Low Lane. The "to Love Lane" part should be removed from the statement, as that is now captured by FP 5A.
5A FP 345 367 +6.4% 4 17m   MZ OT D Statement description is missing the section between TM09695686 and Love/Low Lane at TM09475705, which is included in the GIS data.
6 FP 255 98 −61.6% 2 17m   MZ OT
7 FP 596 601 +0.8% 4 17m   MZ OT
11 FP 410 413 +0.7% 4 17m   MZ OT
12 FP 1897 1812 −4.5% 2 17m   MZ OT Two short sections not mapped in OSM: one in the middle at TM12785819, and an odd kink away from the road at the southern end at TM12205682.
15 FP 881 885 +0.5% 4 5m   MZ OT
16 FP 620 624 +0.6% 4 17m   MZ OT D End of GIS route at TM10865730 is not at Red House Farm.
17 FP 301 308 +2.3% 4 17m   MZ OT D GIS route starts at TM10655752 on All Saints Road and runs along Chequers Lane to TM10865730 which is not at Red House Farm. Hence description in statement makes no sense.
18 FP 859 861 +0.2% 4 17m   MZ OT
19 FP 208 210 +1.0% 4 17m   MZ OT D Statement is erroneously a duplicate of FP 20.
20 FP 618 620 +0.3% 4 17m   MZ OT
21 BR 471 483 +2.5% 4 17m   MZ OT D GIS route stops at junction at TM09875640, so doesn't reach College Farm. The continuation to there is FP 22 in the GIS data.
22 BR 1278 1274 −0.3% 4 17m   MZ OT
24 BR 464 473 +1.9% 4 17m   MZ OT
25 FP 231 244 +5.6% 3 17m   MZ OT
27 FP 98 125 +27.6% 3 17m   MZ OT
28 FP 236 243 +3.0% 4 17m   MZ OT D The Buck's Head pub is now called The Highwayman.
29 FP 564 580 +2.8% 4 17m   MZ OT
30 BR 387 453 +17.1% 4 17m   MZ OT N Severed by truck road
31 FP 626 628 +0.3% 4 17m   MZ OT
32 BR 2140 2144 +0.2% 4 17m   MZ OT D The "path from Hungercut Hall" referred to in the statement is actually BR 55.
32A BR 219 229 +4.6% 4 17m   MZ OT N Severed by A14.
33 FP 451 775 +71.8% 4 17m   MZ OT D In GIS data the section along the towpath is incorrectly marked as FP 58.
34 BR 416 0 0     MZ OT Unclear whether the mapped path is on the definitive line or not.
35 FP 215 230 +7.0% 4 5m   MZ OT D Now in Needham Market Parish following boundary chagnes. South-eastern end joins to Needham Market FP 7. Statement simply says "For particulars of this path see No. 37." But there is no path 37. It probably should be 38.
38 FP 193 191 −1.0% 4 5m   MZ OT D Description includes FP 35 too.
39 FP 89 132 +48.3% 4 5m   MZ OT D Original route crossed railway ending on Gipsy Lane to the south. Proposal to close the crossing and divert the route: went to the Planning Inspector, and appears to have been approved: . The part of FP39 to be extinguished won't be removed until the new route is certified as complete. If route crosses railway, then the line in the GIS data does not extend far enough south. Once the part is extinguished, it should stop at TM08465576 where Needham Market FP 22A commences to follow the track NW.
40 FP 212 202 −4.7% 4 5m   MZ OT D In statement refernce to FP 37 should be FP 38.
54 FP 567 534 −5.8% 4 17m   MZ OT
55 BR 361 355 −1.7% 4 17m   MZ OT
56 FP 330 330 +0.0% 4 17m   MZ OT
57 FP 154 167 +8.4% 4 18m   MZ OT
58 FP 1957 1533 −21.7% 4 5m   MZ OT D Statement is clear that there is a gap in this path (which is filled by FP 33). However, the GIS data includeas the whole of the tow-path route as FP 58.
59 FP 7 8 +14.3% 4 18m   MZ OT D Statement incorrectly refers to FP 58, when it should be FP 33.
Totals   20498 20039 97.8%              

Table Details: To be counted in the table above, OSM ways need to be tagged with an appropriate designation=* tag (one of public_footpath, public_bridleway, restricted_byway, byway_open_to_all_traffic) and the relevant prow_ref=* tag (in the form 'Creeting St Mary XX 12a', where XX is one of FP, BR, RB, BY; and 12 is the route number, and a is an optional suffix letter). The Mapping Status values in the table are: −1 Route should not exist; 0 Unverified; 1 Un-mapped; 2 Partially mapped; 3 Complete, but with significant deviation from definitive line; 4 Complete; 5 Complete, with adjacent field boundaries and stiles, gates etc. These values are manually maintained, so my not be up to date.

Map Details: On the map, the Yellow (FP), Blue (BR), Magenta (RB) and Red (BY) lines are Rights of Way from official Council data from 2021‑10‑12, licensed under the Open Government Licence (v3) (full copyright details). Rights of Way with mapping status 4 and 5 are shown with thin lines, others are show with thick lines. The Green lines are different Highways from OSM: Dark Green for unclassified Highways, Blue-Green for Public Cycleways, and Yellow-Green for Adopted Footways. Click on any of these lines for more information. The black lines are approximate modern parish boundaries, constructed by simplifying the polygons in OS Boundary Line. The underlying mapping is OSM Carto (key). Click inside another parish for a link to switch to that parish.

Use of data in OSM: The Rights of Way GIS data shown on the map above is suitably licenced to be used in OpenStreetMap. If doing so, please use the source tag suffolk_county_council_prow_gis_data. But please do not map Rights of Way just from this data; it is important that OSM reflects what is on the ground as well. Official Rights of Way are not always usable on the ground, and the paths on the ground do not always follow the Definitive Line. The PRoW GIS data (and Definitive Statements, where available and suitably licenced) should be used primarily to add appropriate PRoW tags to ways that have already been mapped from other sources such as aerial imagery (where paths and tracks can clearly been seen) or ground surveys.

Errors and omissions in PRoW tags

OSM ways found in or near the parish with incomplete or contradictory designation=* or prow_ref=* tags. Further details.

No issues found in this parish.

Errors and omissions in access tags

OSM ways with missing or inconsistent modal access tags are listed below. The classes of Public Rights of Way and Highways included on the map are checked, but Rights of Way with other tagging issues already listed above are excluded. Further details.

No issues found in this parish.

Parish ID: 652. OSM data last refreshed: 2021-10-14 17:45:33 Z.