You are in: Rob's OSM Stuff » UK PRoW » Progress » Suffolk » Mid Suffolk » Eye

Rights of Way in Eye Parish (Mid Suffolk, Suffolk)

This page shows a map and table of the Public Rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to All Traffic) in the parish/area of Eye, in the district of Mid Suffolk, in the county of Suffolk. Data from the Surveying Authority (Suffolk County Council) is compared with the data in OpenStreetMap. (more information)

OSM Map | Definitive Statement | PRoW GIS Data (GeoJSON) | OSM Highways (GeoJSON)

No. Type DS LGIS LOSM ΔL/L MS LE AE Z OT DM Notes
1 FP 619 651 +5.2% 4 2y   MZ OT
2 FP 338 337 −0.3% 4 16m   MZ OT
3 FP 837 251 −70.0% 2 2y   MZ OT
4 FP 1075 1073 −0.2% 4 2y   MZ OT
5 FP 584 197 −66.3% 2 2y   MZ OT
7 FP 454 338 −25.6% 2 11m   MZ OT
8 FP 726 472 −35.0% 2 2y   MZ OT
11 FP 1150 1098 −4.5% 4 2y   MZ OT
12 FP 728 416 −42.9% 2 3y   MZ OT
13 FP 1278 1297 +1.5% 4 6m   MZ OT
14 FP 430 430 +0.0% 4 6m   MZ OT
15 FP 1992 2001 +0.5% 4 10m   MZ OT D N Route is in three parts. Description in Electronic Statement doesn't mention the south-eastern part, nor the gap (in Yaxley parish) between the other two parts. Gap from TM13277490 to TM13357492 between the two south-eastern sections is not recorded as a Right of Way, either here or in Yaxley Parish.
16 FP 877 813 −7.3% 4 4m   MZ OT GIS data shows this in two parts. Definitive Statement is ambiguous. What is the status of the cycleway gap in the middle?
17 FP 442 222 −49.8% 2 3y   MZ OT
19 FP 545 547 +0.4% 4 4y   MZ OT
20 FP 959 933 −2.7% 3 4y   MZ OT
21 FP 1619 1623 +0.2% 4 4m   MZ OT
22 FP 436 78 −82.1% 2 2y   MZ OT
23A FP 688 702 +2.0% 3 5y   MZ OT
24 FP 641 641 +0.0% 3 4y   MZ OT
25 FP 400 399 −0.2% 3 13m   MZ OT
26 FP 1484 730 −50.8% 2 16m   MZ OT
27 FP 1897 1922 +1.3% 3 16m   MZ OT
28 FP 465 477 +2.6% 4 5y   MZ OT
29 FP 1991 1991 +0.0% 3 16m   MZ OT
30 FP 259 81 −68.7% 2 16m   MZ OT
32 FP 1650 1666 +1.0% 4 13m   MZ OT
33A FP 409 404 −1.2% 4 5y   MZ OT
34 FP 1345 1346 +0.1% 4 4m   MZ OT
35 FP 674 684 +1.5% 4 5y   MZ OT
36 FP 314 317 +1.0% 4 17m   MZ OT D N Should the NE end of this path join FP 21? The Statement doesn't say and the lines don't join in the GIS data. But the path would be a bit pointless otherwise. Gap at NE end of this route, as it doesn't quite join FP 21.
37 BY 887 892 +0.6% 4 2y 1 MZ OT D In the statement, the grid reference for junction with FP 8 is incorrect (possibly the result of a diversion of the latter).
39 FP 447 437 −2.2% 4 13m   MZ OT
41 FP 379 375 −1.1% 4 2y   MZ OT
42 FP 294 290 −1.4% 4 2y   MZ OT
43 FP 260 264 +1.5% 4 2y   MZ OT
44 FP 327 0 1     MZ OT
45 RB 391 392 +0.3% 4 4y   MZ OT D Description in the Electronic Statement is a duplicate of that for BY 37.
Totals   30291 26787 88.4%              

Table Details: To be counted in the table above, OSM ways need to be tagged with an appropriate designation=* tag (one of public_footpath, public_bridleway, restricted_byway, byway_open_to_all_traffic) and the relevant prow_ref=* tag (in the form 'Eye XX 12a', where XX is one of FP, BR, RB, BY; and 12 is the route number, and a is an optional suffix letter). The Mapping Status values in the table are: −1 Route should not exist; 0 Unverified; 1 Un-mapped; 2 Partially mapped; 3 Complete, but with significant deviation from definitive line; 4 Complete; 5 Complete, with adjacent field boundaries and stiles, gates etc. These values are manually maintained, so my not be up to date.

Map Details: On the map, the Yellow (FP), Blue (BR), Magenta (RB) and Red (BY) lines are Rights of Way from official Council data from 2021‑10‑12, licensed under the Open Government Licence (v3) (full copyright details). Rights of Way with mapping status 4 and 5 are shown with thin lines, others are show with thick lines. The Green lines are different Highways from OSM: Dark Green for unclassified Highways, Blue-Green for Public Cycleways, and Yellow-Green for Adopted Footways. Click on any of these lines for more information. The black lines are approximate modern parish boundaries, constructed by simplifying the polygons in OS Boundary Line. The underlying mapping is OSM Carto (key). Click inside another parish for a link to switch to that parish.

Use of data in OSM: The Rights of Way GIS data shown on the map above is suitably licenced to be used in OpenStreetMap. If doing so, please use the source tag suffolk_county_council_prow_gis_data. But please do not map Rights of Way just from this data; it is important that OSM reflects what is on the ground as well. Official Rights of Way are not always usable on the ground, and the paths on the ground do not always follow the Definitive Line. The PRoW GIS data (and Definitive Statements, where available and suitably licenced) should be used primarily to add appropriate PRoW tags to ways that have already been mapped from other sources such as aerial imagery (where paths and tracks can clearly been seen) or ground surveys.

Errors and omissions in PRoW tags

OSM ways found in or near the parish with incomplete or contradictory designation=* or prow_ref=* tags. Further details.

No issues found in this parish.

Errors and omissions in access tags

OSM ways with missing or inconsistent modal access tags are listed below. The classes of Public Rights of Way and Highways included on the map are checked, but Rights of Way with other tagging issues already listed above are excluded. Further details.

Way ID Number TRO? Notes Fixme JRC
19619078 BY 37 * Signed at S end as Byway, but with "No Motor Vehicles" and "No horse-drawn vehicles" signs "Except permit holders" J+

Parish ID: 683. OSM data last refreshed: 2021-09-27 16:14:02 Z.