You are in: Rob's OSM Stuff » UK PRoW » Progress » Suffolk » Babergh » Cockfield

Rights of Way in Cockfield Parish (Babergh, Suffolk)

This page shows a map and table of the Public Rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to All Traffic) in the parish/area of Cockfield, in the district of Babergh, in the county of Suffolk. Data from the Surveying Authority (Suffolk County Council) is compared with the data in OpenStreetMap. (more information)

OSM Map | Definitive Statement | PRoW GIS Data (GeoJSON)

No. Type DS LGIS LOSM ΔL/L MS LE AE Z OT DM Notes
1 FP 752 741 −1.5% 4 4y   MZ OT
2 FP 428 63 −85.3% 2 4y   MZ OT
3 FP 3267 1780 −45.5% 2 15m   MZ OT
4 FP 1544 397 −74.3% 2 3m   MZ OT D Electronic Statement describes a completely different route to the GIS data. Has there been a modification and the description didn't get updated?
5 RB 464 464 +0.0% 4 4y   MZ OT
5X FP 707 508 −28.1% 2 4y   MZ OT
6 FP 645 44 −93.2% 2 4y   MZ OT
8 FP 200 207 +3.5% 4 2y   MZ OT
9 FP 2270 2292 +1.0% 4 23m   MZ OT
10 FP 2339 25 −98.9% 2 2y   MZ OT
12 FP 2309 1169 −49.4% 2 4m   MZ OT D Statement only describes section from TL90635430 to Earl's Hall Bridge at TL91035356. The line in the GIS data continues along the old railway to TL91415227.
13 FP 1319 753 −42.9% 2 4y   MZ OT
14 FP 354 146 −58.8% 2 4y   MZ OT
16 FP 756 0 1     MZ OT
17 FP 508 218 −57.1% 2 4y   MZ OT
18 FP 293 294 +0.3% 4 4y   MZ OT
20 FP 952 941 −1.2% 4 3m   MZ OT D No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.
21 FP 221 219 −0.9% 4 4y   MZ OT D No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.
22 FP 354 107 −69.8% 2 2y   MZ OT D No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.
23 FP 1486 1478 −0.5% 4 2y   MZ OT D No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.
24 FP 515 509 −1.2% 4 2y   MZ OT D No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.
25 FP 502 495 −1.4% 4 4y   MZ OT D No description for this route in the Electronic Statement as of 2019-04.
26 FP 621 641 +3.2% 4 4y   MZ OT
Totals   22806 13491 59.2%              

Table Details: To be counted in the table above, OSM ways need to be tagged with an appropriate designation=* tag (one of public_footpath, public_bridleway, restricted_byway, byway_open_to_all_traffic) and the relevant prow_ref=* tag (in the form 'Cockfield XX 12a', where XX is one of FP, BR, RB, BY; and 12 is the route number, and a is an optional suffix letter). The Mapping Status values in the table are: −1 Route should not exist; 0 Unverified; 1 Un-mapped; 2 Partially mapped; 3 Complete, but with significant deviation from definitive line; 4 Complete; 5 Complete, with adjacent field boundaries and stiles, gates etc. These values are manually maintained, so my not be up to date.

Map Details: On the map, the Yellow (FP), Blue (BR), Magenta (RB) and Red (BY) lines are Rights of Way from official Council data from 2021‑10‑12, licensed under the Open Government Licence (v3) (full copyright details). Rights of Way with mapping status 4 and 5 are shown with thin lines, others are show with thick lines. The Green lines are different Highways from OSM: Dark Green for unclassified Highways, Blue-Green for Public Cycleways, and Yellow-Green for Adopted Footways. Click on any of these lines for more information. The black lines are approximate modern parish boundaries, constructed by simplifying the polygons in OS Boundary Line. The underlying mapping is OSM Carto (key). Click inside another parish for a link to switch to that parish.

Use of data in OSM: The Rights of Way GIS data shown on the map above is suitably licenced to be used in OpenStreetMap. If doing so, please use the source tag suffolk_county_council_prow_gis_data. But please do not map Rights of Way just from this data; it is important that OSM reflects what is on the ground as well. Official Rights of Way are not always usable on the ground, and the paths on the ground do not always follow the Definitive Line. The PRoW GIS data (and Definitive Statements, where available and suitably licenced) should be used primarily to add appropriate PRoW tags to ways that have already been mapped from other sources such as aerial imagery (where paths and tracks can clearly been seen) or ground surveys.

Errors and omissions in PRoW tags

OSM ways found in or near the parish with incomplete or contradictory designation=* or prow_ref=* tags. Further details.

Way ID Issue prow_ref designation LOSM OSM Note Tag OSM Fixme Tag JRC
463888321 Missing prow_ref public_footpath 6 m Signed as Public Footpath, but not in SCC GIS data. J+
463888332 Missing prow_ref public_footpath 2 m Signed as Public Footpath, but not in SCC GIS data. J+
463888334 Missing prow_ref public_footpath 2 m Signed as Public Footpath, but not in SCC GIS data. J+
463888339 Missing prow_ref public_footpath 1 m Signed as Public Footpath, but not in SCC GIS data. J+
463888356 Missing prow_ref public_footpath 1 m Signed as Public Footpath, but not in SCC GIS data. J+

Errors and omissions in access tags

OSM ways with missing or inconsistent modal access tags are listed below. The classes of Public Rights of Way and Highways included on the map are checked, but Rights of Way with other tagging issues already listed above are excluded. Further details.

No issues found in this parish.

Parish ID: 640. OSM data last refreshed: 2021-09-23 09:08:14 Z.