This page shows a map and table of the Public Rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to All Traffic) in the parish/area of Hinderclay, in the district of Mid Suffolk, in the county of Suffolk. Data from the Surveying Authority (Suffolk County Council) is compared with the data in OpenStreetMap. (more information)
See: OSM Carto
OSM Map | Definitive Statement | PRoW GIS Data (GeoJSON) | OSM Highways (GeoJSON)
No. | Type | DS | LGIS | LOSM | ΔL/L | MS | LE | AE | Z | OT | DM | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | BR | ✓ | 162 | 158 | −2.5% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | D N Statement says route starts at U85. This is now numbered U5906 Heighams Lane. South end at TM01727643 only meets with the Public Footpath FP 1X, making the route a dead end for non-pedestrian users. | ||
1X | FP | ✓ | 283 | 289 | +2.1% | 4 | 3y | MZ | OT | O This route is a continuation of BR 1, presumably arising as the statement says it "narrows down to ordinary footpath". It's not clear to me that the intention of the statement was that part of the route should only be a FP. Probably the description was referring to the width and physical characteristics, rather than the status. Path on ground followed field edge, rather than the definitive lines. | ||
2 | BR | ✓ | 619 | 617 | −0.3% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | |||
3 | BR | ✓ | 291 | 288 | −1.0% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | D Statement says route starts at U85. This is now numbered U5906 Heighams Lane. | ||
4 | BR | ✓ | 161 | 162 | +0.6% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | |||
5 | BR | ✓ | 384 | 385 | +0.3% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | |||
6 | BR | ✓ | 1588 | 1595 | +0.4% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | N Southern end terminates on FP 7, making it a dead end for non-pedestrian users. | ||
7 | FP | ✓ | 1164 | 1161 | −0.3% | 4 | 7w | MZ | OT | Diverted 1988-07-07? | ||
7A | FP | ✓ | 77 | 83 | +7.8% | 4 | 8y | MZ | OT | |||
8 | FP | ✓ | 690 | 689 | −0.1% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | |||
9 | FP | ✓ | 496 | 497 | +0.2% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | |||
10 | BY | ✓ | 1204 | 1490 | +23.8% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | D O Modern track does not quite follow the definitive line in a couple of places. But the deviation is only minor. Suggest definitive line is updated. Description covers both BY 10 and FP 10X. | ||
10X | FP | ✓ | 305 | 314 | +3.0% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | D Description covers both BY 10 and FP 10X. | ||
11 | BY | ✓ | 324 | 324 | +0.0% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | |||
12 | FP | ✓ | 218 | 217 | −0.5% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | |||
13 | FP | ✓ | 941 | 528 | −43.9% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | O Path on ground does not follow the definitive line. But deviations only minor. | ||
14 | FP | ✓ | 77 | 76 | −1.3% | 4 | 8y | MZ | OT | |||
15 | FP | ✕ | — | 0 | — | — | OT | Listed provisionally in pencil in 2013 Paper Statement as a route from TM02557870 to TM03007871. Claim rejected in 2003. | ||||
16 | BR | ✕ | — | 0 | — | — | OT | Listed provisionally in 2013 Paper Statement, but never officially added. | ||||
17 | BY | ✓ | 162 | 169 | +4.3% | 4 | 2y | MZ | OT | |||
18 | FP | ✓ | 505 | 81 | −84.0% | 2 | 2y | MZ | OT | Added to Definitive Map around 2021-12. Needs a survey and to check if there is a new footbridge at TM02777883 to allow it to join up with Blo Norton FP 5. | ||
Totals | 9651 | 9123 | 94.5% |
Table Details: To be counted in the table above, OSM ways need to be tagged with an appropriate designation=* tag (one of public_footpath, public_bridleway, restricted_byway, byway_open_to_all_traffic) and the relevant prow_ref=* tag (in the form 'Hinderclay XX 12a', where XX is one of FP, BR, RB, BY; and 12 is the route number, and a is an optional suffix letter). The Mapping Status values in the table are: −1 Route should not exist; 0 Unverified; 1 Un-mapped; 2 Partially mapped; 3 Complete, but with significant deviation from definitive line; 4 Complete; 5 Complete, with adjacent field boundaries and stiles, gates etc. These values are manually maintained, so my not be up to date.
Map Details: On the map, the Yellow (FP), Blue (BR), Magenta (RB) and Red (BY) lines are Rights of Way from official Council data from 2024‑01‑12, licensed under the Open Government Licence (v3) (full copyright details). Rights of Way with mapping status 4 and 5 are shown with thin lines, others are show with thick lines. The Green lines are different Highways from OSM: Dark Green for unclassified Highways, Blue-Green for Public Cycleways, and Yellow-Green for Adopted Footways. Click on any of these lines for more information. The black lines are approximate modern parish boundaries, constructed by simplifying the polygons in OS Boundary Line. The underlying mapping is OSM Carto (key). Click inside another parish for a link to switch to that parish.
Use of data in OSM: The Rights of Way GIS data shown on the map above is suitably licenced to be used in OpenStreetMap. If doing so, please use the source tag suffolk_county_council_prow_gis_data. But please do not map Rights of Way just from this data; it is important that OSM reflects what is on the ground as well. Official Rights of Way are not always usable on the ground, and the paths on the ground do not always follow the Definitive Line. The PRoW GIS data (and Definitive Statements, where available and suitably licenced) should be used primarily to add appropriate PRoW tags to ways that have already been mapped from other sources such as aerial imagery (where paths and tracks can clearly been seen) or ground surveys.
OSM ways found in or near the parish with incomplete or contradictory designation=* or prow_ref=* tags. Further details.
No issues found in this parish.
OSM ways with missing or inconsistent modal access tags are listed below. The classes of Public Rights of Way and Highways included on the map are checked, but Rights of Way with other tagging issues already listed above are excluded. Further details.
No issues found in this parish.