You are in: Rob's OSM Stuff » UK PRoW » Progress » Suffolk » West Suffolk » Pakenham

Rights of Way in Pakenham Parish (West Suffolk, Suffolk)

This page shows a map and table of the Public Rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to All Traffic) in the parish/area of Pakenham, in the district of West Suffolk, in the county of Suffolk. Data from the Surveying Authority (Suffolk County Council) is compared with the data in OpenStreetMap. (more information)

OSM Map | Definitive Statement | PRoW GIS Data (GeoJSON)

No. Type DS LGIS LOSM ΔL/L MS LE AE Z OT DM Notes
1 FP 1012 1001 −1.1% 4 5y   MZ OT
2 FP 1301 1420 +9.1% 4 5y   MZ OT D According to Electronic Statement, this path starts on Ixworth Road, and runs E to Old Hall. In the GIS data, this segment is show as part of FP 3 instead.
3 FP 971 861 −11.3% 4 22m   MZ OT D According to Electronic Statement, FP starts from FP 2 at Old Hall. In the GIS data, there is an additional segment W to Ixworth Road. This segment should be part of FP 2 instead.
4 FP 1565 1231 −21.3% 2 5y   MZ OT
5 BR 609 624 +2.5% 4 6m   MZ OT
6 BR 1214 1209 −0.4% 4 2d   MZ OT N No exit at southern end for non-pedestrian users.
7 FP 1033 1031 −0.2% 4 5y   MZ OT
8 FP 90 0 0     MZ OT
9 FP 419 435 +3.8% 4 3y   MZ OT
10 FP 415 418 +0.7% 4 5y   MZ OT
11 FP 590 601 +1.9% 4 15m   MZ OT
12 FP 213 224 +5.2% 4 3y   MZ OT
13 FP 193 195 +1.0% 4 2y   MZ OT D Description in Statement describes whole route from Church Hill to Poplar Farm, most of which is in Thurston Parish (and recorded as FP 9 there). The GIS data only includes the section in Pakenham.
14 RB 646 436 −32.5% 2 3y   MZ OT
15 RB 847 380 −55.1% 2 5y   MZ OT
16 BR 2047 2041 −0.3% 4 12m   MZ OT D Description in Electronic Statement is inconsistent with line in GIS data. (Former site of 'Hungry Hall' is shown on old OS maps, but GIS route does not pass it.) Presumably there has been a diversion order and the statement has not been updated. Ixworth BR 4 also affected.
17 FP 926 925 −0.1% 4 5y   MZ OT
19 BR 248 251 +1.2% 4 2y   MZ OT D First grid reference in statement is incorrect: "594,078mE266,211mN" should be "594,178mE266,211mN" i.e. TL9417866211.
20 BR 466 0 0     MZ OT
Totals   14805 13283 89.7%              

Table Details: To be counted in the table above, OSM ways need to be tagged with an appropriate designation=* tag (one of public_footpath, public_bridleway, restricted_byway, byway_open_to_all_traffic) and the relevant prow_ref=* tag (in the form 'Pakenham XX 12a', where XX is one of FP, BR, RB, BY; and 12 is the route number, and a is an optional suffix letter). The Mapping Status values in the table are: −1 Route should not exist; 0 Unverified; 1 Un-mapped; 2 Partially mapped; 3 Complete, but with significant deviation from definitive line; 4 Complete; 5 Complete, with adjacent field boundaries and stiles, gates etc. These values are manually maintained, so my not be up to date.

Map Details: On the map, the Yellow (FP), Blue (BR), Magenta (RB) and Red (BY) lines are Rights of Way from official Council data from 2021‑07‑06, licensed under the Open Government Licence (v3) (full copyright details). Rights of Way with mapping status 4 and 5 are shown with thin lines, others are show with thick lines. The Green lines are different Highways from OSM: Dark Green for unclassified Highways, Blue-Green for Public Cycleways, and Yellow-Green for Adopted Footways. Click on any of these lines for more information. The black lines are approximate modern parish boundaries, constructed by simplifying the polygons in OS Boundary Line. The underlying mapping is OSM Carto (key). Click inside another parish for a link to switch to that parish.

Use of data in OSM: The Rights of Way GIS data shown on the map above is suitably licenced to be used in OpenStreetMap. If doing so, please use the source tag suffolk_county_council_prow_gis_data. But please do not map Rights of Way just from this data; it is important that OSM reflects what is on the ground as well. Official Rights of Way are not always usable on the ground, and the paths on the ground do not always follow the Definitive Line. The PRoW GIS data (and Definitive Statements, where available and suitably licenced) should be used primarily to add appropriate PRoW tags to ways that have already been mapped from other sources such as aerial imagery (where paths and tracks can clearly been seen) or ground surveys.

Errors and omissions in PRoW tags

OSM ways found in or near the parish with incomplete or contradictory designation=* or prow_ref=* tags. Further details.

No issues found in this parish.

Errors and omissions in access tags

OSM ways with missing or inconsistent modal access tags are listed below. The classes of Public Rights of Way and Highways included on the map are checked, but Rights of Way with other tagging issues already listed above are excluded. Further details.

No issues found in this parish.

Parish ID: 869. OSM data last refreshed: 2021-08-04 16:51:32 Z.