You are in: Rob's OSM Stuff » UK PRoW » Progress » Norfolk » Mapping Updates

OSM Status Updates for Norfolk

This page lists rigths of way where the mapping status value stored in this tool appears to be inconsistent with what is mapped in OSM (and tagged with a prow_ref=* tag).

RoWs present with unmapped status set (DS imported)

No RoWs found with this issue

RoWs missing from OSM with mapped status set

No RoWs found with this issue

RoWs close to 100% length with mapped status set to incomplete

Parish Number LGIS LOSM ΔL/L MS LE Notes
Alburgh (South Norfolk) FP 17 406 397 −2.2% 2 4y South end at TM27968654 does not quite meet with the north end of FP 18, and the track between them is not recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way. This leaves a 20m gap in the Right of Way network. Mapped route deviates round wood at S end.
Ashmanhaugh (North Norfolk) FP 1 708 697 −1.6% 2 6y Eastern end of route is a dead end at TG31652105. Statement says it starts from Crowgate Street, but this is not recorded as a Public Highway. Small section at E end unmapped in OSM.
Beachamwell (Breckland) RB 5 3904 3817 −2.2% 2 2y Route obstructed by stinging nettles in open field near east end. Short section unmapped in OSM to the east of this field.
Beeston Regis (North Norfolk) FP 19 268 257 −4.1% 2 5m Route appears to pass though a building "Robin Hill" at TG16274160 near its southern end. The southern end of route is a dead end at TG16274158.
Blofield (Broadland) FP 7 329 316 −4.0% 2 18m Short section unmapped at the north end between the A47 and Shack Lane.
Brancaster (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 9 3401 3323 −2.3% 2 12m Short section of the route on OSM is missing a highway tag and needs a survey.
Carleton Rode (South Norfolk) FP 25 1007 953 −5.4% 2 5y Short missing section in OSM by house. Needs ground survey.
Cringleford (South Norfolk) FP 1 324 315 −2.8% 2 9m Mapped route in OSM does not join the A11. Should it? Also route goes through new housing development. Will it get diverted?
East Winch (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BR 6 824 804 −2.4% 2 3y Small section in the middle not yet mapped in OSM.
Fincham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 4 1590 1512 −4.9% 2 2y Short section in middle unmapped in OSM, where definitive line leaves track.
Fordham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 1 2848 2738 −3.9% 2 6y Short section at E end by A10 unmapped.
Great and Little Plumstead (Broadland) FP 5 70 90 +28.6% 2 2y Original route crossed NDR. Crossing stopped up, and southern section upgraded to BR.
Grimston (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 1 1802 1710 −5.1% 2 6y Curve at E end currently unmapped.
Helhoughton (North Norfolk) RB 7 336 335 −0.3% 2 3y Small kink at South end is currently unmapped in OSM.
Hellesdon (Broadland) FP 3 37 50 +35.1% 2 6y Should "north westwards" in the statement actually be "north eastwards"? Either way, the line in the GIS data is straight and doesn't change direction as the statement suggestions it should.
Hilgay (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BR 11 5720 5614 −1.9% 2 2d Two short sections currently unmapped; one at the NE end, and one by the southern railway crossing.
Lessingham (North Norfolk) FP 12 1298 1266 −2.5% 2 5m South end of route is a dead end, stopping at the parish boundary at TG40612688. Why doesn't this route connect with Ingham FP 8, which ends about 20m away? Small section in SW corner unmapped.
Leziate (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 13 1219 1168 −4.2% 2 8y 'eastwards' should be 'westwards' in description. Mapped route does not continue far enough south.
Narborough (Breckland) BR 6 407 406 −0.2% 2 6y On NCC Highways map, the BR6 line starts at TF74001185, which is about 75m from end of the U33313 at TF74031184. Surely the two should join. Also, the route appears to go under/through a building at TF73961186. This point needs a survey and then to be mapped appropriately in OSM.
Postwick (Broadland) FP 3 1199 1169 −2.5% 2 17m Short section across railway line is not mapped in OSM.
Potter Heigham (North Norfolk) FP 17 2852 2719 −4.7% 2 5y Short section at west end not mapped in OSM.
Pulham Market (South Norfolk) FP 14 330 322 −2.4% 2 7y Short section as S end to check if hedge can be crossed.
Reepham (Broadland) RB 29 1227 1205 −1.8% 2 2y Should join with Bawdeswell RB 4, but mapped route on Definitive Line stops just short of the River. At western end, bridges and alternative path provided slightly further north, but unclear if this caters for all possible users.
Runhall (South Norfolk) BR 5 1272 1252 −1.6% 2 17m There is a small gap in the OSM mapping in the middle of the route. Needs a ground survey to determine whether there is a way through the hedge.
Shelton (South Norfolk) FP 17 71 76 +7.0% 2 4y Short leg at E end unmapped. Need to check on ground.
Sheringham (North Norfolk) FP 19 608 584 −3.9% 2 4m Short section unmapped at southern end. Mapped route cuts the corner off.
South Creake (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 9 1690 1667 −1.4% 2 4y No continuation in either Dunton or Tattersett parishes (North Norfolk). Was the south end and the continuation of this route stopped up for the airport? What happened when it closed? Short section at S end unmapped.
Stow Bardolph (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 21 219 212 −3.2% 2 2y Statement clearly says the route crosses the railway to meet FP 3, but on the Definitive Map and in the GIS data, the line stops to the east of the tracks.
Swaffham (Breckland) FP 25 349 350 +0.3% 2 6y Statement says E end of route is at Norwich Road. In GIS data the route stops short. Definitive Map is inconclusive.
Swannington (Broadland) FP 15 593 594 +0.2% 2 6m In the Statement "Attleborough" should be "Attlebridge". Short section in OSM is untagged by the railway. Does the line deviate to get up/down the steps?
Tacolneston (South Norfolk) FP 9 1604 1583 −1.3% 2 2y Small section near W end is not mapped in OSM.
Thornage (North Norfolk) FP 1 495 498 +0.6% 2 2y Short section unmapped in OSM at S end.
Upton with Fishley (Broadland) FP 4 3435 3377 −1.7% 2 2y Short segment unmapped in OSM at SE end by Old Road.
Welney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BR 3 4808 4738 −1.5% 2 10m Short section under the bridge at the southern end unmapped
Wymondham (South Norfolk) FP 7 239 258 +7.9% 2 16m The Definitive Statement refers to two branches, but only one is present in the GIS data, and only this route is obvious on the ground. The Definitive Map clearly shows two branches, both of which pass through what are now private gardens, and neither of which match the route in the GIS data. Presumably, the necessary modification orders were either not made or not implemented correctly.

RoWs not close to 100% length with mapped status set to complete

Parish Number LGIS LOSM ΔL/L MS LE Notes
Alpington (South Norfolk) FP 1 162 189 +16.7% 4 2m
Ashby with Oby (Great Yarmouth) BR 6 53 202 +281.1% 4 17m Statement says route is 203m long, but in GIS data it is only 53m. Definitive map shows longer route, consistent with the Statement, so presumably the GIS data is wrong.
Aylsham (Broadland) FP 9 226 127 −43.8% 4 16m Route possibly been diverted around 2022-01. See https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/867162/row_3238952_on.pdf Look out for updates in GIS data and statement. Definitive line obstructed by farm building, but easy way round via RB 8.
Beachamwell (Breckland) BR 18 1248 1559 +24.9% 4 5y Line in GIS data deviates from paths available on ground in two places. From historic mapping this doesn't seem to be an ancient RoW, so is the GIS data wrong?
Beeston Regis (North Norfolk) BR 21 167 211 +26.3% 4 6y
Blofield (Broadland) FP 5 330 362 +9.7% 4 7m Statement says the route starts from Globe Lane, but in the GIS data, the route starts 25 along West View Road at TG33140968.
Bradwell (Great Yarmouth) FP 3 548 320 −41.6% 4 5y Definitive Statement records path no 3 as part FP part BR. All recorded as BR in GIS data. Should be split into 3A and 3B.
Brampton (Broadland) FP 12 123 99 −19.5% 4 5y OSM mapping records this path as being disputed. But, regardless of any dispute, while it's shown on the definitive map, it is legally a public footpath.
Bressingham (South Norfolk) FP 17 953 1043 +9.4% 4 9y GIS data is missing N-S section along parish boundary at W end to connect with North Lopham FP 1. Statement seems not to describe this section either, but surely the two paths must join up.
Bressingham (South Norfolk) FP 24 212 260 +22.6% 4 7y Route signed on ground does not match Definitive Statement and GIS data. Apparently a Diversion Order for new route was prepared and passed, but due to an administrative oversight the legal process never finally completed. This also applies to South Lopham FP 17. There's a 30m gap between the east end of Bressingham FP 24 and the U76221 Fen Street, which isn't recorded as a Highway or Public Right of Way. The Definitive Statement is unclear where FP 24 ends, but surely any link should at least have pedestrian rights on it.
Brockdish (South Norfolk) FP 6 160 184 +15.0% 4 16m GIS data and Definitive Map have FP6 and FP6a the other way round from the Statement.
Brundall (Broadland) FP 1 773 123 −84.1% 4 7y First line of statement says path ends at Highfield Avenue, but not correct following modification. Later description correctly describes shortened route. Also FP1 and FP1A are the opposite way round in the GIS data.
Brundall (Broadland) FP 1a 124 807 +550.8% 4 2m FP1 and FP1A are the opposite way round in the Definitive Statement and GIS data.
Burnham Norton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 5 328 361 +10.1% 4 5y Statement says route starts from RB 8, but line in GIS data starts about 20m away. This is how it's shown in on the Definitive Map, but it's possible that the highway boundary of RB 8 is that wide at that point. Route starts 20m away from RB 8 at TF82914410. If the highway boundary isn't that wide there, then there's a gap in teh Rights of Way network.
Cantley (Broadland) FP 12 969 1073 +10.7% 4 3y Definitive line is obstructed by lagoons at TG38940363, but there's a reasonable alternative available.
Castle Rising (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 17 67 86 +28.4% 4 6y
Castle Rising (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 18 112 159 +42.0% 4 2y If the GIS data is correct, then the route is now obstructed. But this means the boundary of the hall has changed. Description in Statement says route follows just north of boundary line of the Hall, but line in GIS data cuts straight through Hall grounds. GIS data matches Definitive Map, where boundary of Hall not clear.
Colney (South Norfolk) FP 1 69 94 +36.2% 4 22m Route across the A47, covering the stopped up part of School Lane.
Denver (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 4 389 607 +56.0% 4 5m The Definitive Statement (dated 2002) is clear that S end is at Sluice Road beyond junction with FP 6. Route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at FP 6. Missing section is also the U21364.
Dereham (Breckland) FP 1 58 96 +65.5% 4 7y Route commences on Bush Lane at TG01691355, but this is not recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way.
Dereham (Breckland) FP 1a 320 361 +12.8% 4 7y
Dereham (Breckland) FP 14 1351 1129 −16.4% 4 8m Route is obstructed just south of the stile at TF98251227, but there is a well-trodden alternative path around to the west. Part of the route to the south of the A47 is included in the GIS data, when it should be under FP 14a.
Dereham (Breckland) FP 14a 81 337 +316.0% 4 3y The route between TF98241215 and TF98161193 does not exist on the ground, but a bridge linking to Scarning FP 7 provides an alternative parallel route. Although the statement is not clear, I think this route should go all the way from the A47 to Stone Road at TF98161193. This means that Part of this route is recorded as FP 14 in the GIS data.
Dersingham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BR 2 89 123 +38.2% 4 17m
Drayton (Broadland) FP 1 403 440 +9.2% 4 8m Dead and at S end.
Dunton (North Norfolk) BR 3 135 159 +17.8% 4 6y
East Walton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 1 340 379 +11.5% 4 2y
Ellingham (South Norfolk) BR 7 263 298 +13.3% 4 6y
Fakenham (North Norfolk) BR 23 3 32 +966.7% 4 7y
Fakenham (North Norfolk) BR 24 38 66 +73.7% 4 3y Definitive line is overgrown.
Fakenham (North Norfolk) BR 25 1 24 +2300.0% 4 7y
Fakenham (North Norfolk) BR 26 5 44 +780.0% 4 5m
Fakenham (North Norfolk) BR 27 4 27 +575.0% 4 5m
Fakenham (North Norfolk) FP 28 62 93 +50.0% 4 7y
Felthorpe (Broadland) FP 16 409 182 −55.5% 4 7y GIS data for route incorrectly includes part of FP 17 too.
Felthorpe (Broadland) FP 17 89 325 +265.2% 4 7y Statement says route ends at FP14 and this is confirmed by the Definitive Map. However, the GIS data only has the southern section; the rest is incorrectly labelled FP16.
Feltwell (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 2 26 47 +80.8% 4 7y
Feltwell (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BY 15 3844 4184 +8.8% 4 17m Definitive Statement clearly says route continues NW of BR 6 coincident with the U21506. This section is not included in the GIS data, and is not on the Definitive Map.
Field Dalling (North Norfolk) FP 3 779 847 +8.7% 4 6y Statement says route ends at the Bale road, but Definitive Map and GIS data have it stopping on a track 50m from the road. The track linkikng the end of the route to the road is not recorded as a Highway or Public Right of Way.
Flordon (South Norfolk) FP 6 582 643 +10.5% 4 19m The location of the mapped bridge in OSM at TM17539756 is not consistent with the GIS data for this route and its continuation as Tharston FP 33. The Definitive Map is inconclusive. Looking at an old OS map, I think the OSM mapping is correct and the GIS data is wrong.
Framingham Earl (South Norfolk) BR 5 51 76 +49.0% 4 4y Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map.
Garboldisham (Breckland) RB 16 541 612 +13.1% 4 5y Statement says that route continues past NW end of RB 17 to meet public highway. Line in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at RB 17. Should a Short spur of Parson's Lane be a Public Highway, even though it's not included on the NCC Highways map?
Geldeston (South Norfolk) FP 9 125 151 +20.8% 4 6y
Great Yarmouth (Great Yarmouth) FP 7a 449 491 +9.4% 4 3y On the Definitive Map, the routes of FP 7 and FP 7a as described in the Statement are shown as a single route labelled FP 7.
Gressenhall (Breckland) RB 7 72 56 −22.2% 4 7y OSM mapping need checking on the ground.
Gunthorpe (North Norfolk) BR 6 570 725 +27.2% 4 6y There is a 130m missing link running NE from northern end of this path and southern end of U14076 Heath Lane, which isn't recorded as a Highway or a Public Right of Way. Surely it should be one or the other, otherwise this route is a dead end.
Halvergate (Broadland) FP 1 1606 1735 +8.0% 4 4y The Definitive Statement says the path "starts from the public highway", but in GIS data the route starts further north from a track which isn't recorded as a Public Highway. Either the GIS data is wrong, the track is missing from the List of Streets, or there's a gap in the network between TG41660801 and TG41700797.
Hellington (South Norfolk) FP 4 92 112 +21.7% 4 2y The statement refers to this route passing the end of FP 5 before continuing to the parish bonudary and Claxton FP 8. In the GIS data (and on the Definitive Map) the junctions with Hellington FP 5 and Claxton FP 8 are conincident, and not at the parish boundary.
Hempton (North Norfolk) RB 8 32 51 +59.4% 4 4y Short road link
Hethersett (South Norfolk) FP 6 1442 1113 −22.8% 4 21m The GIS data also incorrectly includes the part of this route that is actually Ketteringham FP 6.
Hingham (South Norfolk) FP 7 106 128 +20.8% 4 6y Route in GIS data does not match path on the ground.
Hockering (Breckland) FP 12 14 31 +121.4% 4 3y Short link between Lyng Road and A47 bypass.
Hockwold-cum-Wilton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BY 4 270 323 +19.6% 4 2y The Definitive Statement says route ends at Church Lane, but route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops about 30m metres short. Presumably the intention is/was that the missing link from TL73428775 to TL73478770 is part of Church Lane, but the NCC Highways data suggests otherwise. Without rights over the link, the route is a dead end.
Holt (North Norfolk) FP 9 121 152 +25.6% 4 19m
Horning (North Norfolk) RB 4 148 174 +17.6% 4 7y The Statement says this returns to Lower Street, but the Definitive Map and GIS data are missing the final link back to the road. If the Definitive Map is correct, then this route may be a dead end.
Horsey (North Norfolk) FP 4 595 1189 +99.8% 4 7y West section of road/track not part of this FP according to GIS data, but not a Public Highway either according to NCC Highways data.
Kilverstone (Breckland) FP 1 41 69 +68.3% 4 7y Route impassible on ground, but can easily walk around the road instead.
King's Lynn (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 10 81 101 +24.7% 4 3y The Definitive Statement says route starts from end of RB 12, but lines do not meet in GIS data. Statement also refers to a footbridge (presumably now removed) and contains an erroneous repetition near the start.
Kirstead (South Norfolk) FP 7 112 139 +24.1% 4 5y
Kirstead (South Norfolk) FP 7a 156 201 +28.8% 4 5y
Kirstead (South Norfolk) FP 9 42 98 +133.3% 4 7y
Little Cressingham (Breckland) FP 5 197 226 +14.7% 4 7y Mapped route longer than GIS data, but I think the former matches the hedge gaps on the ground.
Little Snoring (North Norfolk) FP 1 86 69 −19.8% 4 5m Check designation -- it joins to Fakenham BR 29 at the border.
Ludham (North Norfolk) FP 12 180 118 −34.4% 4 8y Statement says path ends at FP 12, but GIS data and Definitive map show it continuing a few m further N.
Mattishall (Breckland) FP 1 1192 1558 +30.7% 4 6y Statement says route ends at "Stone Lane". If this is the C211A "Stone Road", then the GIS data and Definitive Map are missing the last 400m of the route, as it stops at TG03111226. If "Stone Lane" is not the C211A, then there is a gap in the network from TG03111226 to TG02801206, as this track is not recorded as a Public Highway. The segment from TG03111226 to TG02801206 is signed as a Footpath on the ground, and is mapped as such in OSM.
Morningthorpe (South Norfolk) FP 30 161 147 −8.7% 4 6y
Morningthorpe (South Norfolk) FP 31 123 109 −11.4% 4 6y
Mulbarton (South Norfolk) FP 5 733 396 −46.0% 4 9d In GIS data, most of the route appears twice in two separate segments, so the GIS length is nearly twice what it should be.
Neatishead (North Norfolk) FP 12 475 436 −8.2% 4 7y Statement implies route stops at FP 13, but GIS data and Definitive Map have it continuing east to meet the public highway. Broad Road is not recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way, so the southern end of this path is a dead end at TG35021959.
Necton (Breckland) FP 1 201 168 −16.4% 4 15m Definitive line in GIS data goes through several buildings. Line in GIS data goes through several buildings. Has the route been diverted, or should it have been? Or is the GIS data wrong?
Newton Flotman (South Norfolk) FP 3 41 64 +56.1% 4 7y
Newton by Castle Acre (Breckland) RB 3 475 636 +33.9% 4 6m Route ends at TF83261630 without continuing SW to St James's Road In 2021-11 the GIS data was updated to include the missing segment between TF83261630 and St James's Road, but in 2022-03 is was changed back again. The online definitive map has always had the route ending at TF83261630. The Statement is ambiguous. The track between TF83261630 and St James's Road does not appear to be recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way. So if this path ends there it is a dead end. See competing DMMO Applications: https://www.norfolk.gov.uk/out-and-about-in-norfolk/public-rights-of-way/register-of-definitive-map-modification-applications/newton-by-castle-acre-deletion-pe32 and https://www.norfolk.gov.uk/out-and-about-in-norfolk/public-rights-of-way/register-of-definitive-map-modification-applications/newton-by-castle-acre-pe32 .
Northwold (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 7 567 630 +11.1% 4 4y Line mapped in OSM is ~10% longer than GIS since route splits in two to cross river with ford and bridge.
Pentney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 15a 808 484 −40.1% 4 7y
Pentney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BR 23 15 34 +126.7% 4 3y Short link between RB 16a and the A47.
Redenhall with Harleston (South Norfolk) FP 34 273 304 +11.4% 4 5y
Scole (South Norfolk) FP 11 294 371 +26.2% 4 9m The Definitive Statement says the path ends at St Andrew's Church, but the line in GIS data stops short.
Scole (South Norfolk) FP 36 403 457 +13.4% 4 2y The alignment of the route in the GIS does not match the line shown on an historic OS 1:25k map, nor the position of the RoW sign at the western end. The Definitive Map is inconclusive, but I'm assuming the GIS data is wrong.
Scole (South Norfolk) FP 38 40 28 −30.0% 4 19m
Scole (South Norfolk) BR 40 67 101 +50.7% 4 2y Short link on line of stopped up road.
Sea Palling (North Norfolk) FP 5 342 396 +15.8% 4 7y Statement says path runs "to the beach", but line in GIS data stops about 50m short.
Shipdham (Breckland) FP 19 61 127 +108.2% 4 3y
Snettisham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 26 3022 74 −97.6% 4 5y There are two path 26's shown on the definitive map, a Footpath along the beach from TF64713350 to TF66153585, and a Restricted Byway (actually a CRF) in the village between TF68523422 and TF68553428. Both are included in the GIS data as a single RB route. Only the Footpath is described in the Definitive Statement.
Snettisham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 32 71 96 +35.2% 4 6m
South Acre (Breckland) RB 5 334 366 +9.6% 4 4y The Definitive Line is not reinstated across the field, but it is walkable (crops permitting).
South Lopham (Breckland) FP 16 539 600 +11.3% 4 9y Definitive Statement says route starts at Brickkiln Lane, but in GIS data, the route stops about 50m W of the lane (U33157). Unclear why, or what the status of the missing segment is. If GIS data is correct, there's a 50m gap on the network between U33157 and the start of the route.
Southery (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 6 481 627 +30.4% 4 3y The Definitive statement says the route should start from Ringmore Drove at junction with FP 7. In the GIS data and on the Definitive Map, the route starts about 120m NE at the end of the U21393 Black Bank Drove Highway.
Stalham (North Norfolk) FP 14 10 60 +500.0% 4 11m
Stockton (South Norfolk) BR 8 569 649 +14.1% 4 3y In the GIS data, the route stops about 60m south of the C392. The gap does not seem to be recorded as a Public Highway. What is the status of this section?
Stoke Ferry (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BR 18 29 58 +100.0% 4 5m Short link between Boughton Road and the A134 bypass.
Strumpshaw (Broadland) FP 10 515 558 +8.3% 4 18m On the Definitive Map and in the GIS data, the SE end of the route stops about 30m short of the U59406. The statement says the route starts from the road. If the GIS data is correct, there's a gap between the path and the U59406 that isn't recorded as a Highway of Right of Way.
Surlingham (South Norfolk) FP 10 352 413 +17.3% 4 9m
Swaffham (Breckland) FP 19 83 104 +25.3% 4 13m
Swaffham (Breckland) FP 30 147 130 −11.6% 4 4y GIS data erroenously includes part of FP 65 between Mangate Street at TF82130905 and the true end of FP 30 at TF82130902.
Swaffham (Breckland) RB 47 1677 1791 +6.8% 4 7y GIS data and Definitive Map have route stopping at TF83110711, about 70m short of Watton Road -- the end point in the Statement. The gap between TF83110711 is not recorded as a Highway, so if the GIS data and Defintive Map are correct there's a gap in the PRoW network here.
Swaffham (Breckland) RB 54 1659 1547 −6.8% 4 12m
Swaffham (Breckland) RB 60 838 1999 +138.5% 4 7y Statement says RB goes from Westacre Road to Fincham Drove. Route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at TF79971021 after less than 850m. If the Map is correct, then this route is a dead end.
Swaffham (Breckland) FP 63 113 257 +127.4% 4 2y This Right of Way comprises several paths in and out of the Shambles. The lines in GIS data don't meet in the middle. Is the centre of the Shambles a public highway perhaps?
Swaffham (Breckland) BR 69 20 37 +85.0% 4 11m
Swannington (Broadland) FP 19 586 529 −9.7% 4 6y GIS data incorrectly has route continuing east to meet FP 16. Statement and Definitive Map state route stops at FP 21.
Swannington (Broadland) FP 21 310 370 +19.4% 4 6y GIS data incorrectly has route stopping at FP 19. Statement and Definitive Map state route continues east to meet FP 16.
Thetford (Breckland) FP 14 991 775 −21.8% 4 3m Route signed on ground by Scout centre does not follow definitive line. Route ends at TL84798670. The continuation along the Parish boundary to Thetford FP 15 and Santon Downham FP 4 at TL84618643 is not recorded as a Right of Way in either parish.
Thurning (North Norfolk) FP 1 641 734 +14.5% 4 7y Line in GIS data starts from the N side of the farm, so doesn't join the road. What access rights exist to get to the path from the road?
Tivetshall St Margaret (South Norfolk) FP 15 743 905 +21.8% 4 2y The Definitive Statement says path starts at Hales Street and ends at NW end of FP 17. In the GIS data and on the Definitive Map, the path starts further south and ends at Grove Road. There's a 150m gap in the track between the end of Hales Street at TM15878707 and the start of FP15 at TM15888693 which isn't recorded as a Public Right of Way. Surely there should at least be pedestrian rights on this section. At the S end, it is possible that the discrepancy has been caused by a previous diversion to FP 17.
West Dereham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 9 312 424 +35.9% 4 7y NE end of mapped route is on former alignment of the main road. This part is not included in the GIS data; is it still a Public Highway?

RoWs with a bounding box mismatch and a mapped status set to complete

Parish Number LGIS LOSM ΔL/L MS LE Notes
Ashby with Oby (Great Yarmouth) BR 6 53 202 +281.1% 4 17m Statement says route is 203m long, but in GIS data it is only 53m. Definitive map shows longer route, consistent with the Statement, so presumably the GIS data is wrong.
Aylsham (Broadland) FP 9 226 127 −43.8% 4 16m Route possibly been diverted around 2022-01. See https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/867162/row_3238952_on.pdf Look out for updates in GIS data and statement. Definitive line obstructed by farm building, but easy way round via RB 8.
Bradwell (Great Yarmouth) FP 3 548 320 −41.6% 4 5y Definitive Statement records path no 3 as part FP part BR. All recorded as BR in GIS data. Should be split into 3A and 3B.
Bressingham (South Norfolk) FP 17 953 1043 +9.4% 4 9y GIS data is missing N-S section along parish boundary at W end to connect with North Lopham FP 1. Statement seems not to describe this section either, but surely the two paths must join up.
Briston (North Norfolk) RB 13 752 790 +5.1% 4 6y Statement says route starts from Hellpit Lane, but line in GIS data only starts about 40m from the road.
Brundall (Broadland) FP 1 773 123 −84.1% 4 7y First line of statement says path ends at Highfield Avenue, but not correct following modification. Later description correctly describes shortened route. Also FP1 and FP1A are the opposite way round in the GIS data.
Brundall (Broadland) FP 1a 124 807 +550.8% 4 2m FP1 and FP1A are the opposite way round in the Definitive Statement and GIS data.
Denver (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 4 389 607 +56.0% 4 5m The Definitive Statement (dated 2002) is clear that S end is at Sluice Road beyond junction with FP 6. Route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at FP 6. Missing section is also the U21364.
Dereham (Breckland) FP 14 1351 1129 −16.4% 4 8m Route is obstructed just south of the stile at TF98251227, but there is a well-trodden alternative path around to the west. Part of the route to the south of the A47 is included in the GIS data, when it should be under FP 14a.
Dereham (Breckland) FP 14a 81 337 +316.0% 4 3y The route between TF98241215 and TF98161193 does not exist on the ground, but a bridge linking to Scarning FP 7 provides an alternative parallel route. Although the statement is not clear, I think this route should go all the way from the A47 to Stone Road at TF98161193. This means that Part of this route is recorded as FP 14 in the GIS data.
Felthorpe (Broadland) FP 16 409 182 −55.5% 4 7y GIS data for route incorrectly includes part of FP 17 too.
Felthorpe (Broadland) FP 17 89 325 +265.2% 4 7y Statement says route ends at FP14 and this is confirmed by the Definitive Map. However, the GIS data only has the southern section; the rest is incorrectly labelled FP16.
Feltwell (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BY 15 3844 4184 +8.8% 4 17m Definitive Statement clearly says route continues NW of BR 6 coincident with the U21506. This section is not included in the GIS data, and is not on the Definitive Map.
Gillingham (South Norfolk) FP 10 272 257 −5.5% 4 3y
Gunthorpe (North Norfolk) BR 6 570 725 +27.2% 4 6y There is a 130m missing link running NE from northern end of this path and southern end of U14076 Heath Lane, which isn't recorded as a Highway or a Public Right of Way. Surely it should be one or the other, otherwise this route is a dead end.
Hockwold-cum-Wilton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BY 4 270 323 +19.6% 4 2y The Definitive Statement says route ends at Church Lane, but route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops about 30m metres short. Presumably the intention is/was that the missing link from TL73428775 to TL73478770 is part of Church Lane, but the NCC Highways data suggests otherwise. Without rights over the link, the route is a dead end.
Horsey (North Norfolk) FP 4 595 1189 +99.8% 4 7y West section of road/track not part of this FP according to GIS data, but not a Public Highway either according to NCC Highways data.
Kirstead (South Norfolk) FP 3 547 585 +6.9% 4 2d
Mattishall (Breckland) FP 1 1192 1558 +30.7% 4 6y Statement says route ends at "Stone Lane". If this is the C211A "Stone Road", then the GIS data and Definitive Map are missing the last 400m of the route, as it stops at TG03111226. If "Stone Lane" is not the C211A, then there is a gap in the network from TG03111226 to TG02801206, as this track is not recorded as a Public Highway. The segment from TG03111226 to TG02801206 is signed as a Footpath on the ground, and is mapped as such in OSM.
Narborough (Breckland) FP 1 2402 2523 +5.0% 4 5y Statement suggests route starts from old A47 (now C537) whereas GIS data has the route starting from the end of River Close. Has there been a diversion order? There's evidence of a change being made on the Definitive Map, but no record in the Amendments section.
Necton (Breckland) FP 1 201 168 −16.4% 4 15m Definitive line in GIS data goes through several buildings. Line in GIS data goes through several buildings. Has the route been diverted, or should it have been? Or is the GIS data wrong?
Newton by Castle Acre (Breckland) RB 3 475 636 +33.9% 4 6m Route ends at TF83261630 without continuing SW to St James's Road In 2021-11 the GIS data was updated to include the missing segment between TF83261630 and St James's Road, but in 2022-03 is was changed back again. The online definitive map has always had the route ending at TF83261630. The Statement is ambiguous. The track between TF83261630 and St James's Road does not appear to be recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way. So if this path ends there it is a dead end. See competing DMMO Applications: https://www.norfolk.gov.uk/out-and-about-in-norfolk/public-rights-of-way/register-of-definitive-map-modification-applications/newton-by-castle-acre-deletion-pe32 and https://www.norfolk.gov.uk/out-and-about-in-norfolk/public-rights-of-way/register-of-definitive-map-modification-applications/newton-by-castle-acre-pe32 .
North Walsham (North Norfolk) FP 6 1800 1755 −2.5% 4 16m Statement says the route starts from the North Walsham Road, but the line on the definitive map and in the GIS data starts about 50m down a track at TG27812921. If the GIS data is correct, then there is a gap in the Rights of Way network, as the track from TG27812921 to the road is not recorded as a Right of Way or a Public Highway.
Pentney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 15a 808 484 −40.1% 4 7y
Scole (South Norfolk) FP 11 294 371 +26.2% 4 9m The Definitive Statement says the path ends at St Andrew's Church, but the line in GIS data stops short.
Shipdham (Breckland) FP 19 61 127 +108.2% 4 3y
Snettisham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 26 3022 74 −97.6% 4 5y There are two path 26's shown on the definitive map, a Footpath along the beach from TF64713350 to TF66153585, and a Restricted Byway (actually a CRF) in the village between TF68523422 and TF68553428. Both are included in the GIS data as a single RB route. Only the Footpath is described in the Definitive Statement.
South Lopham (Breckland) FP 16 539 600 +11.3% 4 9y Definitive Statement says route starts at Brickkiln Lane, but in GIS data, the route stops about 50m W of the lane (U33157). Unclear why, or what the status of the missing segment is. If GIS data is correct, there's a 50m gap on the network between U33157 and the start of the route.
Southery (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 6 481 627 +30.4% 4 3y The Definitive statement says the route should start from Ringmore Drove at junction with FP 7. In the GIS data and on the Definitive Map, the route starts about 120m NE at the end of the U21393 Black Bank Drove Highway.
Swaffham (Breckland) RB 47 1677 1791 +6.8% 4 7y GIS data and Definitive Map have route stopping at TF83110711, about 70m short of Watton Road -- the end point in the Statement. The gap between TF83110711 is not recorded as a Highway, so if the GIS data and Defintive Map are correct there's a gap in the PRoW network here.
Swaffham (Breckland) RB 54 1659 1547 −6.8% 4 12m
Swaffham (Breckland) RB 60 838 1999 +138.5% 4 7y Statement says RB goes from Westacre Road to Fincham Drove. Route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at TF79971021 after less than 850m. If the Map is correct, then this route is a dead end.
Swannington (Broadland) FP 19 586 529 −9.7% 4 6y GIS data incorrectly has route continuing east to meet FP 16. Statement and Definitive Map state route stops at FP 21.
Swannington (Broadland) FP 21 310 370 +19.4% 4 6y GIS data incorrectly has route stopping at FP 19. Statement and Definitive Map state route continues east to meet FP 16.
Tivetshall St Margaret (South Norfolk) FP 15 743 905 +21.8% 4 2y The Definitive Statement says path starts at Hales Street and ends at NW end of FP 17. In the GIS data and on the Definitive Map, the path starts further south and ends at Grove Road. There's a 150m gap in the track between the end of Hales Street at TM15878707 and the start of FP15 at TM15888693 which isn't recorded as a Public Right of Way. Surely there should at least be pedestrian rights on this section. At the S end, it is possible that the discrepancy has been caused by a previous diversion to FP 17.
West Dereham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 9 312 424 +35.9% 4 7y NE end of mapped route is on former alignment of the main road. This part is not included in the GIS data; is it still a Public Highway?

RoWs outside the GIS bounding box and a mapped status set to incomplete

Parish Number LGIS LOSM ΔL/L MS LE Notes
Swaffham (Breckland) FP 25 349 350 +0.3% 2 6y Statement says E end of route is at Norwich Road. In GIS data the route stops short. Definitive Map is inconclusive.

Mapped RoWs flagged as not following the definitive line

Parish Number LGIS LOSM ΔL/L MS LE Notes
Alburgh (South Norfolk) FP 14 789 774 −1.9% 3 7m
Alburgh (South Norfolk) FP 19 105 103 −1.9% 3 7y
Alby with Thwaite (North Norfolk) FP 3 1393 1402 +0.6% 3 3y
Alby with Thwaite (North Norfolk) FP 12 391 564 +44.2% 3 9m
Aldborough (North Norfolk) FP 8 314 326 +3.8% 3 8y
Aldeby (South Norfolk) FP 11 1167 1111 −4.8% 3 5y Mapped route lies 50-100m to the north of the definitive line in places.
Alpington (South Norfolk) FP 5 136 81 −40.4% 3 7y
Alpington (South Norfolk) FP 9 900 1270 +41.1% 3 2m
Alpington (South Norfolk) FP 10 359 372 +3.6% 3 2m
Antingham (North Norfolk) BR 5 562 563 +0.2% 3 8m
Ashby St Mary (South Norfolk) FP 5 312 337 +8.0% 3 7y
Ashby with Oby (Great Yarmouth) FP 4 1750 1688 −3.5% 3 7y
Ashill (Breckland) FP 6 434 399 −8.1% 3 8y
Ashwellthorpe (South Norfolk) FP 3 345 337 −2.3% 3 7y Route mapped not quite aligned with GIS data.
Ashwellthorpe (South Norfolk) FP 4 107 116 +8.4% 3 7y Route mapped not quite aligned with GIS data.
Aslacton (South Norfolk) FP 3 480 503 +4.8% 3 3y Mapped route doesn't follow definitive line from GIS data at east end.
Aslacton (South Norfolk) FP 6 406 454 +11.8% 3 7y
Aslacton (South Norfolk) FP 8 438 438 +0.0% 3 5y Mapped route possibly the wrong side of the hedge at the E end.
Attlebridge (Broadland) RB 1 1083 1080 −0.3% 3 4y
Attlebridge (Broadland) FP 5 239 267 +11.7% 3 7y
Aylsham (Broadland) FP 7 254 203 −20.1% 3 2y
Aylsham (Broadland) BR 24 517 466 −9.9% 3 6y May be obstructed making equestrian / bicycle use difficult.
Baconsthorpe (North Norfolk) FP 12 573 589 +2.8% 3 6y Definitive map appears to show route to east of field boundary along entire length. Mapped route in OSM follows a track that switches sides part was along.
Bacton (North Norfolk) FP 7 584 576 −1.4% 3 5y Middle section should be to the east of the hedge, rather than on the track.
Bacton (North Norfolk) FP 11 1302 1301 −0.1% 3 7y Kink in the middle is not mapped.
Banham (Breckland) FP 15 707 758 +7.2% 3 3y
Banham (Breckland) FP 29 678 672 −0.9% 3 9y
Banham (Breckland) FP 30 2403 2412 +0.4% 3 2y
Barton Turf (North Norfolk) FP 5 1120 1143 +2.1% 3 7y
Barton Turf (North Norfolk) FP 10 172 180 +4.7% 3 5y
Bawdeswell (Breckland) FP 3 335 299 −10.7% 3 8y Alignment in OSM doesn't match GIS data.
Beeston Regis (North Norfolk) BR 10 1473 1438 −2.4% 3 5m Mapped route doesn't follow definitive line in a couple of places.
Beetley (Breckland) FP 6 762 949 +24.5% 3 20m
Beetley (Breckland) FP 9 611 739 +20.9% 3 3y North end of mapped route does not follow definitive line.
Beetley (Breckland) FP 12 342 394 +15.2% 3 9y
Beighton (Broadland) FP 2 139 137 −1.4% 3 19m
Besthorpe (Breckland) FP 8 638 639 +0.2% 3 8y
Binham (North Norfolk) FP 8 1213 1222 +0.7% 3 6y Odd that diverted route doesn't follow existing track at the south end.
Bintree (Breckland) FP 1 193 223 +15.5% 3 6y
Bodham (North Norfolk) FP 1 545 553 +1.5% 3 7y
Bodham (North Norfolk) FP 2 1111 1164 +4.8% 3 5y
Bracon Ash (South Norfolk) FP 1 2048 2081 +1.6% 3 14m A short section just west of the Church Farm is not on the definitive line in OSM.
Bracon Ash (South Norfolk) FP 2 155 101 −34.8% 3 3y
Bracon Ash (South Norfolk) FP 12 419 331 −21.0% 3 19m
Bracon Ash (South Norfolk) FP 13 333 340 +2.1% 3 5y Mapped route does not follow definitive line at S end.
Bracon Ash (South Norfolk) FP 15 133 151 +13.5% 3 7y
Bradwell (Great Yarmouth) FP 20 835 831 −0.5% 3 9m Possible obsrtuction of Definitive line around sub-station, but alternative route exists. Both Statement and GIS Data have the path going around the north and east side of the sub-station (which is probably inaccessible). But the path on the gound goes to the west and south. Definitive Map is unclear, but probably matches the GIS data.
Bramerton (South Norfolk) FP 1 495 529 +6.9% 3 9m
Bramerton (South Norfolk) FP 3 403 424 +5.2% 3 7y
Bramerton (South Norfolk) FP 5 458 414 −9.6% 3 5y Mapped route in OSM does not quite follow the GIS data line at W end.
Brampton (Broadland) FP 1 254 270 +6.3% 3 3y
Brampton (Broadland) FP 10 197 176 −10.7% 3 23m
Bressingham (South Norfolk) FP 9 1656 1721 +3.9% 3 6y Mapped section near east end not quite on definitive line. Need to check how field boundaries are crossed. Route blocked by bushes and ditch at east end. See FMS:854506
Brinton (North Norfolk) FP 4 155 159 +2.6% 3 6y
Brinton (North Norfolk) FP 5 244 233 −4.5% 3 6y
Briston (North Norfolk) FP 3 219 255 +16.4% 3 7y
Briston (North Norfolk) FP 4 502 514 +2.4% 3 7y
Briston (North Norfolk) RB 5 491 498 +1.4% 3 6y
Briston (North Norfolk) FP 7 535 524 −2.1% 3 8y
Brockdish (South Norfolk) FP 11 455 442 −2.9% 3 16m
Brockdish (South Norfolk) FP 12 353 360 +2.0% 3 16m
Burgh Castle (Great Yarmouth) FP 3 740 712 −3.8% 3 6m
Burnham Market (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 1 145 153 +5.5% 3 3y
Burnham Overy (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 1 447 467 +4.5% 3 4y
Burston (South Norfolk) FP 13 683 686 +0.4% 3 2y
Burston (South Norfolk) FP 14 869 915 +5.3% 3 2y
Burston (South Norfolk) FP 24 232 196 −15.5% 3 5y
Burston (South Norfolk) FP 28 384 389 +1.3% 3 2y Mapped route does not follow the Definitive Line from the GIS data, near the Western end. But it's unclear if the Definitive Line has been blocked by new houses. Should the route be diverted?
Burston (South Norfolk) FP 29 290 299 +3.1% 3 2y Route on ground does not follow the Definitive Line.
Burston (South Norfolk) FP 32 980 996 +1.6% 3 2y
Burston (South Norfolk) FP 40 310 317 +2.3% 3 2y Route on ground at southern end does not follow the Definitive Line.
Buxton with Lammas (Broadland) FP 2 478 437 −8.6% 3 6y
Caister-on-Sea (Great Yarmouth) FP 6 286 292 +2.1% 3 6y Mapped route appears to be on wrong side of old railway. It should be on the sea-ward side.
Cantley (Broadland) FP 6 720 725 +0.7% 3 7y
Cawston (Broadland) BR 11 1928 2009 +4.2% 3 3m One section of definitive line probably obstructed by woodland. Mapped route follows track to east.
Claxton (South Norfolk) FP 5 170 176 +3.5% 3 2y
Claxton (South Norfolk) FP 7 1295 936 −27.7% 3 9m
Cley-next-the-Sea (North Norfolk) FP 4 532 516 −3.0% 3 17m SE section is not accessible, but new boardwalk is being constructed. Route in GIS data does not match the route that is available on the ground.
Cley-next-the-Sea (North Norfolk) FP 24 2442 2448 +0.2% 3 6y E end not quite on definitive line.
Colby (North Norfolk) FP 5 413 417 +1.0% 3 7y
Colby (North Norfolk) FP 9 435 258 −40.7% 3 10m
Coltishall (Broadland) FP 2 656 668 +1.8% 3 6y
Coltishall (Broadland) FP 4 186 181 −2.7% 3 7y
Corpusty (North Norfolk) FP 16 1106 1098 −0.7% 3 6y Mapped route deviates from Definitive Line at east end.
Cranworth (Breckland) FP 4 1243 1250 +0.6% 3 7y Statement says route ends at "the Public Highway at High Common". But the Definitive Map and GIS data show the route ending at TF99340550 about 150m short. The track to the road from TF99340550 isn't recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way, making FP 4 a dead end.
Cromer (North Norfolk) FP 1b 494 495 +0.2% 3 5y Mapped route in OSM not quite on Definitive Line
Cromer (North Norfolk) FP 4 239 223 −6.7% 3 3m
Cromer (North Norfolk) FP 11 919 921 +0.2% 3 15m History of being obstructed near old Coastguard Station: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/information_on_cromer_fp_11
Crostwick (Broadland) FP 1 278 276 −0.7% 3 2y
Dereham (Breckland) FP 5 202 169 −16.3% 3 2y Route ends on Bush Lane at TG01641362, but this is not recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way.
Dereham (Breckland) FP 6 818 316 −61.4% 3 2y
Dickleburgh and Rushall (South Norfolk) FP 5 361 368 +1.9% 3 2y At SW end, the definitive line should stay to the west of the fieldboundary, but the mapped line goes to the east.
Diss (South Norfolk) FP 11 220 231 +5.0% 3 7y Unclear how path joins track at E end. Line in GIS data shows it passing through buildings.
Diss (South Norfolk) FP 19 1057 1077 +1.9% 3 2y
Diss (South Norfolk) FP 20 467 450 −3.6% 3 2y
Diss (South Norfolk) FP 27 587 618 +5.3% 3 2y
Diss (South Norfolk) FP 32 552 645 +16.8% 3 2y Southern part of route signposted on the ground does not match the Definitive Line.
East Beckham (North Norfolk) FP 2 2214 2029 −8.4% 3 5y
East Beckham (North Norfolk) FP 4 1374 1305 −5.0% 3 4y Mapped route doesn't follow definitive line through wood and at S end.
East Ruston (North Norfolk) FP 21 321 301 −6.2% 3 8y
East Tuddenham (Breckland) FP 8 882 873 −1.0% 3 4y
East Tuddenham (Breckland) FP 11 1014 1012 −0.2% 3 2y
East Walton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 7 379 376 −0.8% 3 7y
Edgefield (North Norfolk) FP 4 423 458 +8.3% 3 3y
Elsing (Breckland) FP 4 383 437 +14.1% 3 3y
Felmingham (North Norfolk) FP 5 1026 1002 −2.3% 3 8y
Field Dalling (North Norfolk) FP 8 1326 1354 +2.1% 3 6m
Fleggburgh (Great Yarmouth) FP 8 318 333 +4.7% 3 6y
Flordon (South Norfolk) FP 4 860 927 +7.8% 3 2y The mapped route in OSM doesn't quite follow definitive line, but maybe current bridges and stiles are misplaced.
Forncett (South Norfolk) FP 15 1020 1060 +3.9% 3 7y
Forncett (South Norfolk) FP 16 268 300 +11.9% 3 3y
Forncett (South Norfolk) FP 22 218 406 +86.2% 3 20m Mapped route in OSM is significantly off definitive line.
Forncett (South Norfolk) FP 23 565 568 +0.5% 3 2y Route through Sandpit Farm deviates from the definitive line.
Forncett (South Norfolk) FP 25 621 620 −0.2% 3 7y
Forncett (South Norfolk) FP 27 395 390 −1.3% 3 7y
Foulsham (Broadland) FP 7 534 548 +2.6% 3 8y
Foulsham (Broadland) FP 9 638 632 −0.9% 3 6y
Framingham Pigot (South Norfolk) FP 3 184 196 +6.5% 3 18m The line in the GIS data incorrectly follows a modern track. This route is inconsistent with both the line on the Definitive Map and the description in the Definitive Statement.
Gayton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 10 1617 1459 −9.8% 3 2y Mapped route at southern end does not follow definitive line through wood.
Gillingham (South Norfolk) FP 6 630 630 +0.0% 3 2y Mapped route doesn't agree with GIS data at S end.
Gimingham (North Norfolk) FP 7 1398 1378 −1.4% 3 2y
Great Moulton (South Norfolk) FP 1 330 346 +4.8% 3 4y
Great Moulton (South Norfolk) FP 6 397 387 −2.5% 3 5y Check alignment of mapped route at southern end.
Great Witchingham (Broadland) FP 4 622 638 +2.6% 3 4y
Gresham (North Norfolk) FP 6 78 106 +35.9% 3 8y Mapped route is significantly off line of GIS data.
Guestwick (Broadland) FP 3 222 243 +9.5% 3 8y Mapped route doesn't follow definitive line at S end.
Hales (South Norfolk) FP 4 1158 1163 +0.4% 3 3y
Hales (South Norfolk) FP 6 731 767 +4.9% 3 5m
Hales (South Norfolk) FP 7 354 311 −12.1% 3 3y
Halvergate (Broadland) FP 7 187 191 +2.1% 3 3y
Hanworth (North Norfolk) FP 6 170 168 −1.2% 3 9y
Happisburgh (North Norfolk) FP 24 1977 1924 −2.7% 3 3y Cliff-top path. Mapped route of path on ground does not follow Definitive Line owing to coastal erosion.
Hardingham (Breckland) FP 11 294 278 −5.4% 3 4y In Statement, the reference to Hingham FP 1 should be Hingham FP 2, and no Hingham path at the E end. In GIS data, why doesn't E end meet with FP 9? Also part of the route shown in the GIS data actually belongs to Hingham FP 11.
Harpley (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 5 495 493 −0.4% 3 6y
Harpley (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 6 303 327 +7.9% 3 6y If mapping is correct, then the stiles adjacent to the A148 are not on the definitive line.
Haveringland (Broadland) FP 2 1464 1451 −0.9% 3 2y
Heacham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 2 1916 1879 −1.9% 3 6y Current sea bank doesn't agree with line in GIS data in two places. Current sea bank doesn't agree with line in GIS data in two places.
Hedenham (South Norfolk) FP 5 334 333 −0.3% 3 10m
Hellington (South Norfolk) FP 3 305 334 +9.5% 3 3y Mapped route in OSM does not quite follow the Definitive Line.
Hempnall (South Norfolk) FP 13 646 587 −9.1% 3 21m
Hempstead (North Norfolk) FP 5 2036 1977 −2.9% 3 2y
Hempstead (North Norfolk) FP 7 314 323 +2.9% 3 3y The southern end of the mapped route in OSM doesn't appear to follow the Definitive Line.
Hempstead (North Norfolk) FP 8 398 409 +2.8% 3 8y
Hevingham (Broadland) FP 3 310 250 −19.4% 3 7y
Hevingham (Broadland) FP 5 1148 1158 +0.9% 3 6y
Hickling (North Norfolk) FP 6 463 142 −69.3% 3 17m Statement says path runs "to the Green", but the line on the Definitive Map and in the GIS data stops short of this road.
Hilgay (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BR 26 9 24 +166.7% 3 6y According to the Definitive Statement and the GIS data, there's a gap of about 50m between the ends of BR 25 and BR 26. Is this deliberate? What rights are there over the gap? The Definitive Map is inconclusive.
Hillington (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 1 902 915 +1.4% 3 9d Mapped route appears to be on the wrong side if the field boundary towards the eastern end.
Hillington (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BR 3 410 434 +5.9% 3 9d
Hindolveston (North Norfolk) FP 5 502 522 +4.0% 3 5y
Hindolveston (North Norfolk) FP 7 584 667 +14.2% 3 6y
Hingham (South Norfolk) FP 1 1387 1474 +6.3% 3 5y Route ends on parish boundary at TG02190366, but the continuation to join with Hardingham FP 8 at TG02210370 is not recorded as a Public Right of Way. This means this route is a dead end and there is a 40m gap in the Rights of Way network. The Statement for Hingham FP 1 even explicitly says that the route continues and "joins a path leading to Manson Green Farm in the Parish of Hardingham".
Hoe (Breckland) FP 4 359 359 +0.0% 3 3y
Holt (North Norfolk) FP 5 357 374 +4.8% 3 15m
Holt (North Norfolk) FP 6 112 97 −13.4% 3 15m
Holt (North Norfolk) FP 12 489 464 −5.1% 3 19m
Honing (North Norfolk) FP 5 420 441 +5.0% 3 6y
Honing (North Norfolk) FP 13 437 148 −66.1% 3 6y South-West end is a dead-end at TG33142680 with no continuation in Dilham Parish.
Honingham (Broadland) FP 2 319 327 +2.5% 3 7y Mapped route does not follow definitive line at NE end.
Horsey (North Norfolk) FP 5 2434 2502 +2.8% 3 6y Mapped route in OSM does not follow definitive line at NW end.
Ingham (North Norfolk) FP 2 461 490 +6.3% 3 6y
Itteringham (North Norfolk) FP 5 62 83 +33.9% 3 7y
Itteringham (North Norfolk) FP 11 1475 1450 −1.7% 3 3y Mapped route doesn't follow definitive line through farmyard.
Itteringham (North Norfolk) FP 13 1266 1264 −0.2% 3 3y
Itteringham (North Norfolk) FP 16 500 464 −7.2% 3 4y Definitive line is obstructed by a large pond.
Itteringham (North Norfolk) FP 18 382 389 +1.8% 3 7y
Itteringham (North Norfolk) FP 19 181 179 −1.1% 3 7y
Kelling (North Norfolk) FP 8 97 97 +0.0% 3 6y
Kelling (North Norfolk) FP 15 648 648 +0.0% 3 6y
Ketteringham (South Norfolk) FP 1 607 600 −1.2% 3 7y
Ketteringham (South Norfolk) FP 5 722 731 +1.2% 3 22m Definitive Map and Statement both have this route to the west of the field boundary, but the path mapped in OSM is to the east.
Kirby Bedon (South Norfolk) FP 1 145 149 +2.8% 3 7y
Kirby Cane (South Norfolk) FP 3 395 417 +5.6% 3 7y
Kirstead (South Norfolk) FP 1 420 452 +7.6% 3 4y
Kirstead (South Norfolk) FP 2 295 265 −10.2% 3 4y
Kirstead (South Norfolk) FP 5 802 813 +1.4% 3 3y
Knapton (North Norfolk) FP 6 1321 1358 +2.8% 3 8y 1km section is part of FP 6 on Definitive Map and GIS data, but part of FP 8 in the Definitive Statement.
Knapton (North Norfolk) FP 8 177 183 +3.4% 3 8y 1km section is part of FP 6 on Definitive Map and GIS data, but part of FP 8 in the Definitive Statement.
Langley with Hardley (South Norfolk) FP 5 6012 6243 +3.8% 3 3w Definitive line in GIS data shows odd deviation from actual path on the ground, just east of Hardley Dyke.
Lessingham (North Norfolk) FP 4 866 878 +1.4% 3 5m Statement includes Chapel Loke between TG39042746 and TG39272745. This is part of FP 19 on the Definitive Map. The Southen part is mapped to the east of the Hedge. I think the Definitive Line is on the west.
Lessingham (North Norfolk) FP 16 1271 1250 −1.7% 3 8y
Leziate (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 10 833 891 +7.0% 3 8y
Little Barningham (North Norfolk) BR 1 318 304 −4.4% 3 4y
Little Ellingham (Breckland) FP 2 860 868 +0.9% 3 3y Need to check paths at SE end of common.
Little Walsingham (North Norfolk) FP 7 500 505 +1.0% 3 3y
Little Witchingham (Broadland) FP 2 678 677 −0.1% 3 6y
Loddon (South Norfolk) FP 13 233 257 +10.3% 3 13m
Loddon (South Norfolk) FP 15 738 623 −15.6% 3 4y
Loddon (South Norfolk) FP 20 371 333 −10.2% 3 2y In Statement, 'Mundford' should be 'Mundham'.
Long Stratton (South Norfolk) FP 1 230 252 +9.6% 3 9m
Long Stratton (South Norfolk) FP 19 476 450 −5.5% 3 2y
Ludham (North Norfolk) RB 25 499 487 −2.4% 3 6y Slight discrepancy between mapped route and definitive line at SE end.
Ludham (North Norfolk) FP 26 1668 1647 −1.3% 3 5y Shown as FP on Definitive Map and in GIS data, but as RB in Statement. Mapped route in OSM at NW end does not quite agree with GIS data / definitive map.
Ludham (North Norfolk) RB 34 229 228 −0.4% 3 6y
Marham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BR 5 813 761 −6.4% 3 5y
Marlingford (South Norfolk) FP 3 1113 1139 +2.3% 3 3y
Marlingford (South Norfolk) FP 5 114 135 +18.4% 3 8y
Marlingford (South Norfolk) FP 7 1498 1468 −2.0% 3 21m Mapped route of middle section in OSM does not follow the Definitive Line.
Marsham (Broadland) FP 1 1256 1252 −0.3% 3 3y
Marsham (Broadland) FP 14 1056 1083 +2.6% 3 3m Mapped route in OSM does not quite follow definitive line. Western end should be checked.
Marsham (Broadland) RB 16 705 728 +3.3% 3 15m
Marsham (Broadland) FP 17 381 356 −6.6% 3 7m
Marsham (Broadland) RB 18 2404 2439 +1.5% 3 3m
Marsham (Broadland) FP 19 1716 1609 −6.2% 3 2y
Marsham (Broadland) FP 23 465 486 +4.5% 3 18m
Marsham (Broadland) FP 24 734 703 −4.2% 3 3y
Marsham (Broadland) FP 25 532 513 −3.6% 3 3y
Marsham (Broadland) FP 27 468 489 +4.5% 3 9y
Matlask (North Norfolk) FP 2 1139 1170 +2.7% 3 4y
Mattishall (Breckland) FP 9 769 829 +7.8% 3 4y
Mattishall (Breckland) FP 21 459 332 −27.7% 3 7y
Mautby (Great Yarmouth) FP 9 607 600 −1.2% 3 7y Mapped route doesn't quite follow the Definitive Line at the east end.
Mautby (Great Yarmouth) FP 14 901 902 +0.1% 3 3y Mapped route does not quite follow the Definitive Line at the SE end.
Mautby (Great Yarmouth) FP 16 593 595 +0.3% 3 4y Definitive Line appears to be obstructed by drainage channel, but bridge nearby provides and alternative route.
Mautby (Great Yarmouth) BR 17 644 626 −2.8% 3 4y Mapped route on modern track doesn't quite follow Definitive Line.
Mileham (Breckland) FP 5 661 679 +2.7% 3 15m
Morningthorpe (South Norfolk) FP 1 224 246 +9.8% 3 3y
Morningthorpe (South Norfolk) FP 16 833 890 +6.8% 3 2y
Mulbarton (South Norfolk) FP 1 525 585 +11.4% 3 6y
Mulbarton (South Norfolk) FP 10 771 777 +0.8% 3 6y
Neatishead (North Norfolk) FP 10 218 227 +4.1% 3 2y Statement ends with "runs southwards to Footpath No. 8". Presumably this is a transcription error, being a repetition of the end of the statement for FP 7. The route should "runs southwards to Mill Loke." Mill Loke/Lane is not recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way, so the southern end of this route at TG34051946 is legally a dead end.
Neatishead (North Norfolk) FP 13 228 240 +5.3% 3 7y
Needham (South Norfolk) FP 3 300 301 +0.3% 3 4w
Needham (South Norfolk) FP 7 189 169 −10.6% 3 7y
Needham (South Norfolk) FP 8 315 326 +3.5% 3 16m
Newton by Castle Acre (Breckland) FP 4 176 178 +1.1% 3 7y
North Elmham (Breckland) FP 4 386 404 +4.7% 3 23m
North Walsham (North Norfolk) FP 1 1021 1028 +0.7% 3 8y
North Walsham (North Norfolk) FP 3 519 509 −1.9% 3 8y
North Walsham (North Norfolk) FP 4 642 627 −2.3% 3 8y
North Walsham (North Norfolk) FP 15 1170 1180 +0.9% 3 8y
Northrepps (North Norfolk) FP 17 88 3 6y Recorded in Statement as FP, but missing from GIS data. Definitive Map shows route as a short link at the S end of Roughton FP 2. In the GIS data, this segment is erroneously included as part of Roughton FP 2.
Ormesby St Margaret with Scratby (Great Yarmouth) FP 1 832 886 +6.5% 3 6y
Ormesby St Margaret with Scratby (Great Yarmouth) FP 3 310 320 +3.2% 3 4y There is a kink in Definitive Line in the GIS data near northern end of gaveyard, which is not reflected in the mapped route in OSM.
Oulton (Broadland) FP 1 377 392 +4.0% 3 3y
Oulton (Broadland) FP 4 669 650 −2.8% 3 3y
Oulton (Broadland) FP 5 181 189 +4.4% 3 3y
Overstrand (North Norfolk) FP 1 1077 1107 +2.8% 3 15m Cliff-top erosion means the path is now slightly inland from the original Definitive Line. Mapped path follows route available on the ground.
Paston (North Norfolk) FP 3 218 218 +0.0% 3 7y
Paston (North Norfolk) FP 5 950 868 −8.6% 3 12m
Pentney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 16 137 161 +17.5% 3 6y
Pentney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) RB 16a 1550 1372 −11.5% 3 5m
Pentney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 22 186 253 +36.0% 3 7y
Plumstead (North Norfolk) FP 1 457 459 +0.4% 3 6y Mapped route not on Definitive Line; should it actually run to the east of the hedge?
Poringland (South Norfolk) FP 2 586 601 +2.6% 3 10m West end at TG25980154 is not on a public highway according to the NCC highways data. See FP 1. Mapped route also doesn't follow line of GIS data near W end.
Poringland (South Norfolk) FP 8 483 477 −1.2% 3 2m
Potter Heigham (North Norfolk) FP 8 585 582 −0.5% 3 6y
Rackheath (Broadland) FP 4 395 409 +3.5% 3 8y
Rackheath (Broadland) FP 5 1330 1315 −1.1% 3 3y
Reedham (Broadland) FP 13 1443 1500 +4.0% 3 8m
Ringland (Broadland) FP 4 811 811 +0.0% 3 16m Currently mapped route is to the west of the field boundary. NCC GIS data and Definitive Map suggest route should go up the main drive to the east of the boundary.
Ringland (Broadland) FP 7 432 435 +0.7% 3 7y
Ringland (Broadland) FP 8 149 160 +7.4% 3 7y
Ringland (Broadland) FP 9 523 526 +0.6% 3 2y
Roughton (North Norfolk) FP 2 1220 1136 −6.9% 3 6y GIS data erroneously includes an extra section at the S end of this route, which should be Northrepps FP 17 according to the Definitive Map and Statement.
Roydon (South Norfolk) FP 5 290 290 +0.0% 3 2y Route terminates at NW cornder of Little Green wood at TM09738119, about 30m from the road at TM09748116. A path exists on the ground, but it not recorded as a Right of Way. Little Green wood does not appear to be Access Land, so there is a gap in the Rights of Way network. Mapped route doesn't follow Definitive line at south end. Check accessibilty.
Runhall (South Norfolk) FP 18 640 643 +0.5% 3 9y Mapped route doesn't follow line from GIS data at E end.
Runton (North Norfolk) FP 7 1000 1035 +3.5% 3 7y
Runton (North Norfolk) RB 12 663 667 +0.6% 3 5y Mapped route shows small deviation from GIS data at southern end.
Runton (North Norfolk) FP 18 722 716 −0.8% 3 6y Small deviation in mapped route near southern end.
Runton (North Norfolk) FP 23 1001 988 −1.3% 3 2y
Salhouse (Broadland) FP 4 671 670 −0.1% 3 4y
Salhouse (Broadland) FP 5 666 681 +2.3% 3 2y
Salhouse (Broadland) FP 14 1026 1031 +0.5% 3 2y Mapped route doesn't quite follow definitive line at the kink in the middle.
Salle (Broadland) FP 3 1197 1199 +0.2% 3 5y
Salle (Broadland) FP 12 909 905 −0.4% 3 6y
Salthouse (North Norfolk) FP 16 3078 3068 −0.3% 3 6y
Saxlingham Nethergate (South Norfolk) FP 8 713 746 +4.6% 3 3y Mapped route doesn't quite follow definitive at S end.
Saxlingham Nethergate (South Norfolk) FP 9 835 817 −2.2% 3 9m Mapped route doesn't quite follow definitive at N end.
Saxlingham Nethergate (South Norfolk) FP 12 1301 1349 +3.7% 3 8m Mapped route in OSM contains a deviation that's not part of the definitive line.
Saxlingham Nethergate (South Norfolk) FP 26 1522 1480 −2.8% 3 10m Mapped route in OSM follows path on ground between TM21899661 and TM21689623, but this doesn't agree with the Definitive Map and GIS data. I suspect the OSM route is correct, and the recently diverted route for that section simply wasn't recorded accurately on the Definitive Map.
Saxlingham Nethergate (South Norfolk) FP 29 633 542 −14.4% 3 3y According to the GIS data this overlaps with some of RB 24 for a bit. Definitive Statement is ambiguous.
Scole (South Norfolk) FP 2 447 477 +6.7% 3 2y
Scole (South Norfolk) FP 3 481 493 +2.5% 3 2y Definitive line seems to be to west of boundary on norther section, but line mapped in OSM is to the East.
Scole (South Norfolk) FP 5 1338 1377 +2.9% 3 2y
Scole (South Norfolk) FP 10 779 763 −2.1% 3 9m Mapped route deviates from the definitive line near the electricity pylon at TM13898017. Route obstructed by hedge at TM13878027.
Scole (South Norfolk) FP 21 1055 1027 −2.7% 3 19m
Scole (South Norfolk) FP 23 1160 1186 +2.2% 3 21m In at least two places, the mapped route in OSM does not follow the Definitive Line.
Scole (South Norfolk) FP 30 164 188 +14.6% 3 21m
Seething (South Norfolk) FP 1 482 499 +3.5% 3 5m Accidental repetition of "Kirstead Footpath No. 4 at its junction with" in Statement.
Seething (South Norfolk) FP 8 352 344 −2.3% 3 7y
Shelfanger (South Norfolk) FP 4 68 85 +25.0% 3 5y
Shelfanger (South Norfolk) FP 8 461 477 +3.5% 3 2y Path does not quite meet up with FP 7 at Druids' Lane. Is this part of Druid's Lane a Public Highway? If not there is a gap in the network.
Shelfanger (South Norfolk) FP 11 576 558 −3.1% 3 2y Cross-field route and bridge not on the Definitive Line.
Shelton (South Norfolk) FP 3 579 576 −0.5% 3 2y Mapped route in OSM doesn't quite follow definitive line at S end.
Sheringham (North Norfolk) FP 9 747 741 −0.8% 3 5m Road at western end linking path at TG16394339 to Vincent Road at TG16334337 is not recorded as a Public Highway or a Right of Way, leaving a gap in the network.
Sheringham (North Norfolk) FP 26 1194 1254 +5.0% 3 13m Statement clearly describes the route running south along the western boundary of the pond to join the Esplanade. But this section is missing from the Definitive Map and the GIS data.
Shipdham (Breckland) BR 15 784 774 −1.3% 3 3y Route in GIS data runs through residential buildings. Has it been diverted? Oddly, GIS data for route was updated 2016-06-27, but route appears unaltered. Definitive map shows diversion to current line made in January 2003, but lines on map appear to have been drawn carelessly.
Shipdham (Breckland) BR 16 141 176 +24.8% 3 3y Route in GIS data runs through residential buildings. Has it been diverted? Oddly, GIS data for route was updated 2016-06-27, but route appears unaltered. Definitive map shows diversion to current line made in January 2003, but lines on map appear to have been drawn carelessly.
Shotesham (South Norfolk) FP 4 868 880 +1.4% 3 2y
Shotesham (South Norfolk) FP 6 894 888 −0.7% 3 6y
Shotesham (South Norfolk) FP 17 961 962 +0.1% 3 20m
Shropham (Breckland) FP 3 1455 1501 +3.2% 3 3y Mapped route on OSM doesn't follow definitive line at S end.
Skeyton (North Norfolk) FP 2 417 432 +3.6% 3 7y
Skeyton (North Norfolk) FP 3 225 262 +16.4% 3 6y
Skeyton (North Norfolk) FP 5 92 94 +2.2% 3 6y
Sloley (North Norfolk) FP 1 538 548 +1.9% 3 5y Route in OSM doesn't follow Definitive Line through northern-most field.
Sloley (North Norfolk) FP 3 168 191 +13.7% 3 8y
Smallburgh (North Norfolk) FP 1 1272 1289 +1.3% 3 7m Route starts at TG33782455, but neither Dark Lane nor the stretch of School Lane east of TG33612450 are recorded as Highways or Rights of Way, making this path a dead end. Mapped route doesn't match definitive line at NE end.
Snettisham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BR 13 619 622 +0.5% 3 3y Something is wrong with the description: "runs for approximately 2.7 metres to the north east for a distance of approximately 198 metres".
Southrepps (North Norfolk) FP 10 412 408 −1.0% 3 8y
Southrepps (North Norfolk) FP 18 373 353 −5.4% 3 8y
Sporle with Palgrave (Breckland) BR 1 807 865 +7.2% 3 5y Doesn't quite follow definitive line at W end.
Starston (South Norfolk) FP 5 2324 2378 +2.3% 3 2y Road at south end is not recorded as a Right of Way or Public Highway, making the route a dead end.
Starston (South Norfolk) FP 17 256 249 −2.7% 3 7y GIS data shows the path to run south of the pond at the E end, but currently mapped passing to the north of it.
Starston (South Norfolk) FP 18 92 88 −4.3% 3 5y Definitive line obstructed. Route should be further south than currently mapped in OSM.
Starston (South Norfolk) FP 19 697 688 −1.3% 3 2y Route should join FP 18 further south than currently mapped in OSM.
Stoke Ferry (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) BR 10 4915 4877 −0.8% 3 2y
Stoke Holy Cross (South Norfolk) FP 2 428 478 +11.7% 3 3y Route mapped in OSM does not quite follow the Definitive Line.
Stow Bedon (Breckland) FP 1 508 548 +7.9% 3 4y
Stratton Strawless (Broadland) FP 3 543 547 +0.7% 3 6y Slight kink in mapped route near NW end.
Strumpshaw (Broadland) FP 6 450 482 +7.1% 3 18m
Strumpshaw (Broadland) FP 8 276 241 −12.7% 3 18m
Strumpshaw (Broadland) FP 11 188 176 −6.4% 3 2y
Strumpshaw (Broadland) FP 13 526 538 +2.3% 3 4y
Strumpshaw (Broadland) FP 16 569 541 −4.9% 3 2y
Suffield (North Norfolk) FP 1 781 813 +4.1% 3 9y Mapped route not quite on definitive line at S end.
Suffield (North Norfolk) FP 3 956 953 −0.3% 3 8m North end along farm drive not on definitive line.
Sustead (North Norfolk) FP 5 692 726 +4.9% 3 8y
Sustead (North Norfolk) FP 6 623 607 −2.6% 3 5y
Sustead (North Norfolk) FP 8 508 515 +1.4% 3 5y
Swannington (Broadland) FP 2 161 183 +13.7% 3 21m
Swannington (Broadland) FP 3 440 454 +3.2% 3 20m
Swannington (Broadland) FP 10 526 512 −2.7% 3 2y
Swannington (Broadland) FP 11 229 233 +1.7% 3 8y
Swanton Abbott (North Norfolk) FP 5 78 93 +19.2% 3 3y
Swanton Abbott (North Norfolk) FP 10 185 191 +3.2% 3 6y South end is a dead end. Statement says route starts on Brake Farm Road, but this isn't a Right of Way or Highway. Surely there should be at least pedestrian rights on the section linking this with FP 8.
Swanton Novers (North Norfolk) FP 10 601 615 +2.3% 3 6y
Swardeston (South Norfolk) FP 2 913 949 +3.9% 3 4y
Tacolneston (South Norfolk) FP 7 1426 1443 +1.2% 3 20m
Tacolneston (South Norfolk) FP 8 513 494 −3.7% 3 20m GIS data shows the N half to the W of the wood. Statement not specific, but mapped route is in the wood.
Tasburgh (South Norfolk) FP 2 214 260 +21.5% 3 4y
Tharston (South Norfolk) FP 3 316 278 −12.0% 3 3y
Tharston (South Norfolk) FP 7 1731 1767 +2.1% 3 3y
Tharston (South Norfolk) BR 16 442 455 +2.9% 3 4w GIS data has the E-W section being straight, mapped route in OSM has a bend part way along.
Thorpe St Andrew (Broadland) FP 6 440 414 −5.9% 3 2y
Tibenham (South Norfolk) FP 6 309 327 +5.8% 3 3y
Tibenham (South Norfolk) FP 20 1362 1237 −9.2% 3 7y
Tivetshall St Mary (South Norfolk) FP 3 369 402 +8.9% 3 2y East end is at Church Lane, but this isn't recorded as a Highway or Right of Way.
Topcroft (South Norfolk) FP 4 524 545 +4.0% 3 7y
Topcroft (South Norfolk) FP 9 861 900 +4.5% 3 3y Definitive Statement says route enters Topcroft Street, but in GIS data and the Definitive map the route stops 30m short of the main highway. If the GIS data is correct, the link between the ed of the Right of Way and Topcroft Street is a gap in the nework as it's not recorded as a Public Highway on the NCC online map.
Trimingham (North Norfolk) FP 4 881 912 +3.5% 3 6y Mapped route in OSM does not follow definitive line through farm.
Trimingham (North Norfolk) FP 6 216 245 +13.4% 3 5y
Trowse with Newton (South Norfolk) FP 2 156 160 +2.6% 3 2y
Wacton (South Norfolk) FP 12 293 290 −1.0% 3 16m
Walsoken (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 6 1214 1196 −1.5% 3 23m Grid references in the statement erroneously list the 10km square as TL, when it should be TF. Hence the two grid references should be TF45721160 and TF45751160. Mapped route in OSM does not follow the Definitive Line. Possibly the stiles are in the wrong place.
West Caister (Great Yarmouth) FP 2 276 301 +9.1% 3 7y
West Dereham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 1 1390 1380 −0.7% 3 6y
West Dereham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 10 887 915 +3.2% 3 8y
West Rudham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) FP 3 186 221 +18.8% 3 6y
Weston Longville (Broadland) FP 1 1426 1406 −1.4% 3 3y
Weybourne (North Norfolk) FP 5 704 734 +4.3% 3 5y
Weybourne (North Norfolk) FP 7 3287 3223 −1.9% 3 20m
Whinburgh (Breckland) FP 3 1341 1374 +2.5% 3 19m
Whinburgh (Breckland) FP 6 1502 1516 +0.9% 3 2y
Wickmere (North Norfolk) FP 3 821 838 +2.1% 3 6y
Wickmere (North Norfolk) FP 6 1142 1132 −0.9% 3 8y Bridge over stream near N end is not on the Definitive line.
Winfarthing (South Norfolk) BR 19 659 659 +0.0% 3 5y
Wood Norton (North Norfolk) FP 2 1570 1570 +0.0% 3 6y
Worstead (North Norfolk) FP 8 586 596 +1.7% 3 7y
Wreningham (South Norfolk) FP 10 138 173 +25.4% 3 7y
Wymondham (South Norfolk) FP 18 558 594 +6.5% 3 20m
Wymondham (South Norfolk) FP 34 701 729 +4.0% 3 23m

RoWs present in parishes without Definitive Statement import

No RoWs found with this issue