This page lists rigths of way where the mapping status value stored in this tool appears to be inconsistent with what is mapped in OSM (and tagged with a prow_ref=* tag).
No RoWs found with this issue
No RoWs found with this issue
| Parish | Number | LGIS | LOSM | ΔL/L | MS | LE | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alburgh (South Norfolk) | FP | 17 | 406 | 397 | −2.2% | 2 | 20m | South end at TM27968654 does not quite meet with the north end of FP 18, and the track between them is not recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way. This leaves a 20m gap in the Right of Way network. Mapped route deviates round wood at S end. |
| Ashmanhaugh (North Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 708 | 697 | −1.6% | 2 | 3y | Eastern end of route is a dead end at TG31652105. Statement says it starts from Crowgate Street, but this is not recorded as a Public Highway. Small section at E end unmapped in OSM. |
| Beachamwell (Breckland) | RB | 5 | 3904 | 3817 | −2.2% | 2 | 3y | Route obstructed by stinging nettles in open field near east end. Short section unmapped to east of this field. |
| Blofield (Broadland) | FP | 7 | 329 | 351 | +6.7% | 2 | 4y | Short section unmapped at north end. |
| Brancaster (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 3401 | 3326 | −2.2% | 2 | 2y | Short section on OSM is missing a highway tag and needs a survey. |
| Carleton Rode (South Norfolk) | FP | 25 | 1007 | 953 | −5.4% | 2 | 2y | Short missing section in OSM by house. Needs ground survey. |
| Cringleford (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 324 | 319 | −1.5% | 2 | 4y | Mapped route doesn't join A11. Should it? |
| Downham West (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BR | 2 | 219 | 209 | −4.6% | 2 | 3y | Short section at east end unmapped. |
| East Winch (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BR | 6 | 824 | 804 | −2.4% | 2 | 4m | Small section in the middle not yet mapped in OSM. |
| Fakenham (North Norfolk) | RB | 1 | 423 | 435 | +2.8% | 2 | 3y | Short section in the middle still needs to be mapped. |
| Fincham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 1590 | 1512 | −4.9% | 2 | 4y | Short section in middle unmapped, where definitive line leaves track. |
| Fordham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 2848 | 2738 | −3.9% | 2 | 3y | Short section at E end by A10 unmapped. |
| Grimston (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 1802 | 1710 | −5.1% | 2 | 4y | Curve at E end currently unmapped. |
| Hales (South Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 731 | 727 | −0.5% | 2 | 2y | Short section to be checked for accessibility. |
| Helhoughton (North Norfolk) | RB | 7 | 336 | 335 | −0.3% | 2 | 6m | Small kink at South end is currently unmapped in OSM. |
| Hellesdon (Broadland) | FP | 3 | 37 | 50 | +35.1% | 2 | 3y | Should "north westwards" in the statement actually be "north eastwards"? Either way, the line in the GIS data is straight and doesn't change direction as the statement suggestions it should. |
| Hilgay (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | RB | 15 | 1965 | 2002 | +1.9% | 2 | 4y | Short section at W end unmapped. |
| Holt (North Norfolk) | FP | 15 | 296 | 299 | +1.0% | 2 | 3y | Definitive Statement says path starts from road by Holt Lodge. GIS data and Definitive Map only show eastern section. Signs of changes having been made on the Definitive Map, but nothing listed in the Amendments section. |
| Leziate (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | RB | 13 | 1219 | 1168 | −4.2% | 2 | 5y | 'eastwards' should be 'westwards' in description. Mapped route does not continue far enough south. |
| Narborough (Breckland) | BR | 6 | 407 | 406 | −0.2% | 2 | 3y | On NCC Highways map, the BR6 line starts at TF74001185, which is about 75m from end of the U33313 at TF74031184. Surely the two should join. Also, the route appears to go under/through a building at TF73961186. This point needs a survey and then to be mapped appropriately in OSM. |
| Postwick (Broadland) | FP | 3 | 1199 | 1169 | −2.5% | 2 | 2y | Short section across railway line unmapped. |
| Potter Heigham (North Norfolk) | FP | 17 | 2853 | 2719 | −4.7% | 2 | 3y | Short section at west end not mapped in OSM. |
| Pulham Market (South Norfolk) | FP | 14 | 330 | 322 | −2.4% | 2 | 4y | Short section as S end to check if hedge can be crossed. |
| Runhall (South Norfolk) | BR | 5 | 1272 | 1251 | −1.7% | 2 | 3m | There's a small gap in the OSM mapping in the middle of the route. Needs a survey to determine whether there is a way through the hedge. |
| Shelton (South Norfolk) | FP | 17 | 71 | 76 | +7.0% | 2 | 14m | Short leg at E end unmapped. Need to check on ground. |
| Smallburgh (North Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 1272 | 1280 | +0.6% | 2 | 2m | Route starts at TG33782455, but neither Dark Lane nor the stretch of School Lane east of TG33612450 are recorded as Highways or Rights of Way, making this path a dead end. |
| South Creake (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | RB | 9 | 1690 | 1667 | −1.4% | 2 | 19m | No continuation in either Dunton or Tattersett parishes (North Norfolk). Was the south end and the continuation of this route stopped up for the airport? What happened when it closed? Short section at S end unmapped. |
| Stow Bardolph (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | RB | 21 | 219 | 212 | −3.2% | 2 | 3y | Statement clearly says the route crosses the railway to meet FP 3, but on the Definitive Map and in the GIS data, the line stops to the east of the tracks. |
| Swaffham (Breckland) | FP | 25 | 349 | 349 | +0.0% | 2 | 3y | Statement says E end of route is at Norwich Road. In GIS data the route stops short. Definitive Map is inconclusive. |
| Swannington (Broadland) | FP | 15 | 593 | 588 | −0.8% | 2 | 14m | In the Statement "Attleborough" should be "Attlebridge". Short section in OSM is untagged by the railway. Does line deviate to get up/down the steps? |
| Tacolneston (South Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 1602 | 1554 | −3.0% | 2 | 2y | Small section near W end not mapped. |
| Thornage (North Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 495 | 498 | +0.6% | 2 | 3y | Short section unmapped at S end. |
| Tivetshall St Mary (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 369 | 449 | +21.7% | 2 | 6w | East end is at Church Lane, but this isn't recorded as a Highway or Right of Way. |
| Upton with Fishley (Broadland) | FP | 4 | 3435 | 3379 | −1.6% | 2 | 13m | Short segment unmapped in OSM at SE end. |
| Welney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BR | 3 | 4808 | 4738 | −1.5% | 2 | 3y | Short section at S end unmapped |
| Wymondham (South Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 239 | 257 | +7.5% | 2 | 4y | Definitive Statement refers to two branches, but only one is present in the GIS data, and only this route is obvious on the ground. The Definitive Map clearly shows two branches, both of which pass through what are now private gardens, and neither of which match the route in the GIS data. Presumably, the necessary modification orders were either not made or not implemented correctly. |
| Parish | Number | LGIS | LOSM | ΔL/L | MS | LE | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alburgh (South Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 23 | 16 | −30.4% | 4 | 5y | |
| Ashby with Oby (Great Yarmouth) | BR | 6 | 53 | 202 | +281.1% | 4 | 3y | Statement says route is 203m long, but in GIS data it is only 53m. Definitive map shows longer route, consistent with the Statement, so presumably the GIS data is wrong. |
| Attleborough (Breckland) | BR | 4 | 372 | 915 | +146.0% | 4 | 2y | Statment implies route starts from TM03069628 (on the old Attleborough Road, which is still a Public Highway, the U35334) and runs to TM02459589. The GIS data only includes SW third of this route (from TM02799589 to TM02459589). The Definitive Map agrees with GIS data. The section of the route that between TM03069628 and TM02799589 that is missing from Definitive Map and GIS data is not recorded as a Public Highway on the NCC online map, which would mean a gap in the RoW network if the Map is correct. |
| Attleborough (Breckland) | BR | 8 | 1232 | 1034 | −16.1% | 4 | 16m | Listed in Definitive Statement as BY, but in GIS data as BR. Statement hasn't been updated yet for FP8a at southern railway crossing. GIS erroneously contians the section between TM03849344 and TM03989358 making it too long by about 200m. |
| Beachamwell (Breckland) | BR | 18 | 1249 | 1559 | +24.8% | 4 | 2y | Line in GIS data deviates from paths available on ground in two places. From historic mapping this doesn't seem to be an ancient RoW, so is the GIS data wrong? |
| Beeston Regis (North Norfolk) | BR | 21 | 167 | 211 | +26.3% | 4 | 3y | |
| Blofield (Broadland) | FP | 5 | 330 | 362 | +9.7% | 4 | 2y | Statement says the route starts from Globe Lane, but in the GIS data, the route starts 25 along West View Road at TG33140968. |
| Bradwell (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 3 | 548 | 320 | −41.6% | 4 | 2y | Definitive Statement records path no 3 as part FP part BR. All recorded as BR in GIS data. Should be split into 3A and 3B. |
| Brampton (Broadland) | FP | 12 | 123 | 99 | −19.5% | 4 | 2y | OSM mapping records this path as being disputed. But, regardless of any dispute, while it's shown on the definitive map, it is legally a public footpath. |
| Bressingham (South Norfolk) | FP | 17 | 953 | 1043 | +9.4% | 4 | 7y | GIS data is missing N-S section along parish boundary at W end to connect with North Lopham FP 1. Statement seems not to describe this section either, but surely the two paths must join up. |
| Bressingham (South Norfolk) | FP | 24 | 212 | 260 | +22.6% | 4 | 4y | Route signed on ground does not match Definitive Statement and GIS data. Apparently a Diversion Order for new route was prepared and passed, but due to an administrative oversight the legal process never finally completed. This also applies to South Lopham FP 17. There's a 30m gap between the east end of Bressingham FP 24 and the U76221 Fen Street, which isn't recorded as a Highway or Public Right of Way. The Definitive Statement is unclear where FP 24 ends, but surely any link should at least have pedestrian rights on it. |
| Bressingham (South Norfolk) | FP | 33 | 767 | 346 | −54.9% | 4 | 4y | GIS data and Definitive Map include an E-W section in FP33, which is part of FP34 according to the Statement. |
| Bressingham (South Norfolk) | FP | 34 | 325 | 756 | +132.6% | 4 | 2y | As of 2016-07, the route is blocked at TM08558171 (FMS:855303). In Statement reference to "FP 37" should be "FP 7". In the GIS data and Definitive Map, the E-W part described in the statement for FP34 is assigned to FP33 instead. Why doesn't this route continue east to meet common road? The linking track is actually signed at both ends as a Public Footpath. |
| Brockdish (South Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 160 | 297 | +85.6% | 4 | 3y | GIS data and Definitive Map have FP6 and FP6a the other way round from the Statement. |
| Brockdish (South Norfolk) | FP | 8a | 89 | 128 | +43.8% | 4 | 3y | |
| Brundall (Broadland) | FP | 1 | 773 | 124 | −84.0% | 4 | 4y | First line of statement says path ends at Highfield Avenue, but not correct following modification. Later description correctly describes shortened route. Also FP1 and FP1A are the opposite way round in the GIS data. |
| Brundall (Broadland) | FP | 1a | 124 | 800 | +545.2% | 4 | 2y | FP1 and FP1A are the opposite way round in the Statement and GIS data. |
| Burnham Norton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 328 | 361 | +10.1% | 4 | 2y | Statement says route starts from RB 8, but line in GIS data starts about 30m away. This is how it's shown in on the Definitive Map, but I assume that the highway boundary of RB 8 is that wide at that point. |
| Cantley (Broadland) | FP | 12 | 969 | 1073 | +10.7% | 4 | 2m | Definitive line is obstructed by lagoons at TG38940363, but there's a reasonable alternative available. |
| Castle Rising (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 17 | 67 | 87 | +29.9% | 4 | 4y | |
| Castle Rising (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 18 | 112 | 159 | +42.0% | 4 | 5y | If the GIS data is correct, the route is now obstructed. But this means the boundary of the hall has changed. Description in Statement says route follows just north of boundary line of the Hall, but line in GIS data cuts straight through Hall grounds. GIS data matches Definitive Map, where boundary of Hall not clear. |
| Colney (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 69 | 94 | +36.2% | 4 | 2y | |
| Denver (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | RB | 4 | 389 | 607 | +56.0% | 4 | 14m | The Definitive Statement (dated 2002) is clear that S end is at Sluice Road beyond junction with FP 6. Route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at FP 6. Missing section is also the U21364. |
| Dereham (Breckland) | FP | 1 | 58 | 96 | +65.5% | 4 | 4y | Check on access rights to get to N end. |
| Dereham (Breckland) | FP | 1a | 320 | 361 | +12.8% | 4 | 4y | |
| Dereham (Breckland) | FP | 14 | 1352 | 1129 | −16.5% | 4 | 5m | Route is obstructed just south of the stile at TF98251227, but there is a well-trodden alternative path around to the west. Part of the route to the south of the A47 is included in the GIS data, when it should be under FP 14a. |
| Dereham (Breckland) | FP | 14a | 81 | 337 | +316.0% | 4 | 5m | The route between TF98241215 and TF98161193 does not exist on the ground, but a bridge linking to Scarning FP 7 provides an alternative parallel route. Although the statement is not clear, I think this route should go all the way from the A47 to Stone Road at TF98161193. This means that Part of this route is recorded as FP 14 in the GIS data. |
| Dersingham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BR | 2 | 89 | 123 | +38.2% | 4 | 14m | |
| Drayton (Broadland) | FP | 5 | 351 | 324 | −7.7% | 4 | 2y | Definitive line not accessible, but other paths exist. |
| Dunton (North Norfolk) | BR | 3 | 135 | 159 | +17.8% | 4 | 3y | |
| East Walton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | RB | 1 | 340 | 379 | +11.5% | 4 | 3y | |
| Ellingham (South Norfolk) | BR | 7 | 263 | 298 | +13.3% | 4 | 3y | |
| Fakenham (North Norfolk) | BR | 23 | 3 | 32 | +966.7% | 4 | 4y | |
| Fakenham (North Norfolk) | BR | 24 | 38 | 66 | +73.7% | 4 | 4w | Definitive line is overgrown. |
| Fakenham (North Norfolk) | BR | 25 | 1 | 24 | +2300.0% | 4 | 4y | |
| Fakenham (North Norfolk) | BR | 26 | 5 | 44 | +780.0% | 4 | 4y | |
| Fakenham (North Norfolk) | BR | 27 | 4 | 27 | +575.0% | 4 | 3y | |
| Fakenham (North Norfolk) | FP | 28 | 62 | 93 | +50.0% | 4 | 4y | |
| Felthorpe (Broadland) | FP | 16 | 409 | 182 | −55.5% | 4 | 4y | GIS data for route incorrectly includes part of FP 17 too. |
| Felthorpe (Broadland) | FP | 17 | 89 | 325 | +265.2% | 4 | 4y | Statement says route ends at FP14 and this is confirmed by the Definitive Map. However, the GIS data only has the southern section; the rest is incorrectly labelled FP16. |
| Feltwell (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 26 | 47 | +80.8% | 4 | 4y | |
| Feltwell (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BY | 15 | 3844 | 4183 | +8.8% | 4 | 14m | The Definitive Statement clearly says route continues NW of BR 6 coincident with the U21506. This section is not included in the GIS data, not on the Definitive Map. |
| Field Dalling (North Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 779 | 847 | +8.7% | 4 | 3y | Statement says route ends at the Bale road, but Definitive Map and GIS data have it stopping on a track 50m from the road. The track linkikng the end of the route to the road is not recorded as a Highway or Public Right of Way. |
| Flordon (South Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 582 | 641 | +10.1% | 4 | 20m | Location of the mapped bridge in OSM at TM17539756 is not consistent with the GIS data for this route and its continuation as Tharston FP 33. The Definitive Map is inconclusive. Looking at an old OS map, I think the OSM mapping is correct and the GIS data is wrong. |
| Framingham Earl (South Norfolk) | BR | 5 | 52 | 76 | +46.2% | 4 | 18m | Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map. |
| Garboldisham (Breckland) | RB | 16 | 541 | 612 | +13.1% | 4 | 2y | Statement says that route continues past NW end of RB 17 to meet public highway. Line in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at RB 17. Should a Short spur of Parson's Lane be a Public Highway, even though it's not included on the NCC Highways map? |
| Geldeston (South Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 126 | 152 | +20.6% | 4 | 3y | |
| Great Yarmouth (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 7a | 449 | 491 | +9.4% | 4 | 4m | On the Definitive Map, the routes of FP 7 and FP 7a as described in the Statement are shown as a single route labelled FP 7. |
| Gressenhall (Breckland) | RB | 7 | 72 | 56 | −22.2% | 4 | 4y | OSM mapping need checking on the ground. |
| Gunthorpe (North Norfolk) | BR | 6 | 570 | 725 | +27.2% | 4 | 3y | There is a 130m missing link running NE from northern end of this path and southern end of U14076 Heath Lane, which isn't recorded as a Highway or a Public Right of Way. Surely it should be one or the other, otherwise this route is a dead end. |
| Halvergate (Broadland) | FP | 1 | 1606 | 1735 | +8.0% | 4 | 16m | The Definitive Statement says the path "starts from the public highway", but in GIS data the route starts further north from a track which isn't recorded as a Public Highway. Either the GIS data is wrong, the track is missing from the List of Streets, or there's a gap in the network between TG41660801 and TG41700797. |
| Hellington (South Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 92 | 112 | +21.7% | 4 | 6m | I think the junction with Claxton FP 8 in the GIS data should be further east to lie on the parish boundary. |
| Hempton (North Norfolk) | RB | 8 | 32 | 51 | +59.4% | 4 | 14m | |
| Hethersett (South Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 1442 | 1123 | −22.1% | 4 | 4y | GIS data also incorrectly includes the part of this route that is actually Ketteringham FP 6. |
| Hingham (South Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 106 | 128 | +20.8% | 4 | 4y | Route in GIS data does not match path on the ground. |
| Hockering (Breckland) | FP | 12 | 14 | 31 | +121.4% | 4 | 4m | |
| Hockwold-cum-Wilton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BY | 4 | 270 | 323 | +19.6% | 4 | 4y | Statement says route ends at Church Lane, but route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops about 30m metres short. Presumably the intention is/was that the missing link from TL73428775 to TL73478770 is part of Church Lane, but the NCC Highways data suggests otherwise. Without rights over the link, the route is a dead end. |
| Horning (North Norfolk) | RB | 4 | 148 | 174 | +17.6% | 4 | 4y | The Statement says this returns to Lower Street, but the Definitive Map and GIS data are missing the final link back to the road. |
| Horsey (North Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 595 | 1189 | +99.8% | 4 | 4y | West section of road/track not part of this FP according to GIS data, but not a Public Highway either according to NCC Highways data. |
| King's Lynn (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 81 | 101 | +24.7% | 4 | 8m | Statement says route starts from end of RB 12, but lines do not meet in GIS data. Statement also refers to a footbridge (presumably now removed) and contains an erroneous repetition near the start. |
| Kirstead (South Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 112 | 139 | +24.1% | 4 | 2y | |
| Kirstead (South Norfolk) | FP | 7a | 156 | 201 | +28.8% | 4 | 2y | |
| Kirstead (South Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 42 | 100 | +138.1% | 4 | 4y | |
| Little Cressingham (Breckland) | FP | 5 | 197 | 226 | +14.7% | 4 | 4y | Mapped route longer than GIS data, but I think the former matches the hedge gaps on the ground. |
| Little Snoring (North Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 86 | 69 | −19.8% | 4 | 4y | Check designation -- it joins to Fakenham BR 29 at the border. |
| Ludham (North Norfolk) | FP | 12 | 180 | 118 | −34.4% | 4 | 5y | Statement says path ends at FP 12, but GIS data and Definitive map show it continuing a few m further N. |
| Mattishall (Breckland) | FP | 1 | 1192 | 1558 | +30.7% | 4 | 3y | Statement says route ends at "Stone Lane". If this is the C211A "Stone Road", then the GIS data and Definitive Map are missing the last 400m of the route, as it stops at TG03111226. If "Stone Lane" is not the C211A, then there is a gap in the network from TG03111226 to TG02801206, as this track is not recorded as a Public Highway. The segment from TG03111226 to TG02801206 is signed as a Footpath on the ground, and is mapped as such in OSM. |
| Morningthorpe (South Norfolk) | FP | 31 | 123 | 109 | −11.4% | 4 | 3y | |
| Neatishead (North Norfolk) | FP | 12 | 475 | 436 | −8.2% | 4 | 4y | Statement implies route stops at FP 13, but GIS data and Definitive Map have it continuing east to meet the public highway. Broad Road is not recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way, so the southern end of this path is a dead end at TG35021959. |
| Needham (South Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 126 | 154 | +22.2% | 4 | 4y | |
| Newton Flotman (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 41 | 64 | +56.1% | 4 | 4y | |
| Northwold (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 567 | 630 | +11.1% | 4 | 16m | Line mapped in OSM is ~10% longer than GIS since route splits in two to cross river with ford and bridge. |
| Ormesby St Michael (Great Yarmouth) | BR | 4 | 13 | 31 | +138.5% | 4 | 3y | |
| Pentney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BR | 23 | 15 | 34 | +126.7% | 4 | 4m | |
| Redenhall with Harleston (South Norfolk) | FP | 25 | 421 | 458 | +8.8% | 4 | 4y | |
| Redenhall with Harleston (South Norfolk) | FP | 34 | 273 | 304 | +11.4% | 4 | 2y | |
| Roudham (Breckland) | RB | 15 | 870 | 932 | +7.1% | 4 | 9m | |
| Roydon (South Norfolk) | FP | 20 | 234 | 262 | +12.0% | 4 | 2y | |
| Scole (South Norfolk) | FP | 11 | 295 | 369 | +25.1% | 4 | 20m | Statement says the path ends at St Andrew's Church, but the line in GIS data stops short. |
| Scole (South Norfolk) | BR | 40 | 70 | 101 | +44.3% | 4 | 3y | |
| Scole (South Norfolk) | BR | 43 | 640 | 708 | +10.6% | 4 | 6m | In GIS data NE end stops short of highway. Perhaps the final part is within the highway boundary though. |
| Sea Palling (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 342 | 396 | +15.8% | 4 | 4y | Statement says path runs "to the beach", but line in GIS data stops about 50m short. |
| Sheringham (North Norfolk) | FP | 11 | 554 | 519 | −6.3% | 4 | 19m | Statement says the path commences at the east end of Nelson Road. However, the maintained section of Nelson Road ends at Hillside Road at TG16764316 (and Conway Road is not included in the List of Streets), while according to the Definitive Map and GIS data, the path doesn't start until TG16874310. The route between TG16764316 and TG16874310 is not recorded as a Public Highway or a Right of Way, leaving a gap in the network. |
| Shipdham (Breckland) | FP | 19 | 140 | 127 | −9.3% | 4 | 9m | |
| Snettisham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 32 | 71 | 96 | +35.2% | 4 | 2y | |
| South Acre (Breckland) | RB | 5 | 334 | 366 | +9.6% | 4 | 13m | The Definitive Line is not reinstated across the field, but it is walkable (crops permitting). |
| South Lopham (Breckland) | FP | 16 | 539 | 600 | +11.3% | 4 | 6y | Definitive Statement says route starts at Brickkiln Lane, but in GIS data, the route stops about 50m W of the lane (U33157). Unclear why, or what the status of the missing segment is. If GIS data is correct, there's a 50m gap on the network between U33157 and the start of the route. |
| Southery (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 481 | 627 | +30.4% | 4 | 3m | Definitive statement says the route should start from Ringmore Drove at junction with FP 7. In GIS data and on Definitive Map, the route starts about 120m NE at the end of the U21393 Black Bank Drove Highway. |
| Stalham (North Norfolk) | FP | 14 | 10 | 67 | +570.0% | 4 | 4y | |
| Stockton (South Norfolk) | BR | 8 | 569 | 648 | +13.9% | 4 | 5m | In the GIS data, the route stops about 60m south of the C392. The gap does not seem to be recorded as a Public Highway. What is the status of this section? |
| Stoke Ferry (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BR | 18 | 29 | 56 | +93.1% | 4 | 4y | |
| Strumpshaw (Broadland) | FP | 19 | 77 | 98 | +27.3% | 4 | 2y | |
| Swaffham (Breckland) | FP | 30 | 147 | 130 | −11.6% | 4 | 14m | GIS data erroenously includes part of FP 65 between Mangate Street at TF82130905 and the true end of FP 30 at TF82130902. |
| Swaffham (Breckland) | RB | 47 | 1677 | 1791 | +6.8% | 4 | 4y | GIS data and Definitive Map have route stopping at TF83110711, about 70m short of Watton Road -- the end point in the Statement. The gap between TF83110711 is not recorded as a Highway, so if the GIS data and Defintive Map are correct there's a gap in the PRoW network here. |
| Swaffham (Breckland) | RB | 60 | 838 | 1999 | +138.5% | 4 | 4y | Statement says RB goes from Westacre Road to Fincham Drove. Route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at TF79971021 after less than 850m. If the Map is correct, then this route is a dead end. |
| Swaffham (Breckland) | FP | 63 | 113 | 256 | +126.5% | 4 | 3y | Several paths in and out of the Shambles. Lines in GIS data don't meet in the middle. Is the centre a public highway? |
| Swannington (Broadland) | FP | 19 | 586 | 529 | −9.7% | 4 | 3y | GIS data incorrectly has route continuing east to meet FP 16. Statement and Definitive Map state route stops at FP 21. |
| Swannington (Broadland) | FP | 21 | 310 | 370 | +19.4% | 4 | 3y | GIS data incorrectly has route stopping at FP 19. Statement and Definitive Map state route continues east to meet FP 16. |
| Thetford (Breckland) | FP | 16 | 440 | 403 | −8.4% | 4 | 4y | Route in GIS data crosses the river away from the Middle Stanch bridge. Presumably a modification order is needed to correct the route. |
| Thurning (North Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 641 | 734 | +14.5% | 4 | 4y | Line in GIS data starts from the N side of the farm, so doesn't join the road. What access rights exist to get to the path from the road? |
| Tivetshall St Margaret (South Norfolk) | FP | 15 | 744 | 907 | +21.9% | 4 | 6w | Statement says path starts at Hales Street and ends at NW end of FP 17. In GIS data and on the Definitive Map, the path starts further south and ends at Grove Road. There's a 150m gap in the track between the end of Hales Street at TM15878707 and the start of FP15 at TM15888693 which isn't recorded as a Public Right of Way. Surely there should at least be pedestrian rights on this section. At the S end, it is possible that the discrepancy has been caused by a previous diversion to FP 17. |
| West Dereham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 312 | 424 | +35.9% | 4 | 4y | NE end of mapped route is on former alignment of the main road. This part is not included in the GIS data; is it still a Public Highway? |
| Westwick (North Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 110 | 319 | +190.0% | 4 | 4y | GIS data has not been updated to match new route (approximately 320m long) as indicated in Definitive Statement and on Definitive Map. |
| Wretham (Breckland) | BR | 7 | 493 | 538 | +9.1% | 4 | 14m | |
| Parish | Number | LGIS | LOSM | ΔL/L | MS | LE | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashby with Oby (Great Yarmouth) | BR | 6 | 53 | 202 | +281.1% | 4 | 3y | Statement says route is 203m long, but in GIS data it is only 53m. Definitive map shows longer route, consistent with the Statement, so presumably the GIS data is wrong. |
| Attleborough (Breckland) | BR | 4 | 372 | 915 | +146.0% | 4 | 2y | Statment implies route starts from TM03069628 (on the old Attleborough Road, which is still a Public Highway, the U35334) and runs to TM02459589. The GIS data only includes SW third of this route (from TM02799589 to TM02459589). The Definitive Map agrees with GIS data. The section of the route that between TM03069628 and TM02799589 that is missing from Definitive Map and GIS data is not recorded as a Public Highway on the NCC online map, which would mean a gap in the RoW network if the Map is correct. |
| Bradwell (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 3 | 548 | 320 | −41.6% | 4 | 2y | Definitive Statement records path no 3 as part FP part BR. All recorded as BR in GIS data. Should be split into 3A and 3B. |
| Bressingham (South Norfolk) | FP | 17 | 953 | 1043 | +9.4% | 4 | 7y | GIS data is missing N-S section along parish boundary at W end to connect with North Lopham FP 1. Statement seems not to describe this section either, but surely the two paths must join up. |
| Bressingham (South Norfolk) | FP | 33 | 767 | 346 | −54.9% | 4 | 4y | GIS data and Definitive Map include an E-W section in FP33, which is part of FP34 according to the Statement. |
| Bressingham (South Norfolk) | FP | 34 | 325 | 756 | +132.6% | 4 | 2y | As of 2016-07, the route is blocked at TM08558171 (FMS:855303). In Statement reference to "FP 37" should be "FP 7". In the GIS data and Definitive Map, the E-W part described in the statement for FP34 is assigned to FP33 instead. Why doesn't this route continue east to meet common road? The linking track is actually signed at both ends as a Public Footpath. |
| Briston (North Norfolk) | RB | 13 | 752 | 790 | +5.1% | 4 | 3y | Statement says route starts from Hellpit Lane, but line in GIS data only starts about 40m from the road. |
| Brockdish (South Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 160 | 297 | +85.6% | 4 | 3y | GIS data and Definitive Map have FP6 and FP6a the other way round from the Statement. |
| Brundall (Broadland) | FP | 1 | 773 | 124 | −84.0% | 4 | 4y | First line of statement says path ends at Highfield Avenue, but not correct following modification. Later description correctly describes shortened route. Also FP1 and FP1A are the opposite way round in the GIS data. |
| Brundall (Broadland) | FP | 1a | 124 | 800 | +545.2% | 4 | 2y | FP1 and FP1A are the opposite way round in the Statement and GIS data. |
| Denver (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | RB | 4 | 389 | 607 | +56.0% | 4 | 14m | The Definitive Statement (dated 2002) is clear that S end is at Sluice Road beyond junction with FP 6. Route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at FP 6. Missing section is also the U21364. |
| Dereham (Breckland) | FP | 14 | 1352 | 1129 | −16.5% | 4 | 5m | Route is obstructed just south of the stile at TF98251227, but there is a well-trodden alternative path around to the west. Part of the route to the south of the A47 is included in the GIS data, when it should be under FP 14a. |
| Dereham (Breckland) | FP | 14a | 81 | 337 | +316.0% | 4 | 5m | The route between TF98241215 and TF98161193 does not exist on the ground, but a bridge linking to Scarning FP 7 provides an alternative parallel route. Although the statement is not clear, I think this route should go all the way from the A47 to Stone Road at TF98161193. This means that Part of this route is recorded as FP 14 in the GIS data. |
| Felthorpe (Broadland) | FP | 16 | 409 | 182 | −55.5% | 4 | 4y | GIS data for route incorrectly includes part of FP 17 too. |
| Felthorpe (Broadland) | FP | 17 | 89 | 325 | +265.2% | 4 | 4y | Statement says route ends at FP14 and this is confirmed by the Definitive Map. However, the GIS data only has the southern section; the rest is incorrectly labelled FP16. |
| Feltwell (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BY | 15 | 3844 | 4183 | +8.8% | 4 | 14m | The Definitive Statement clearly says route continues NW of BR 6 coincident with the U21506. This section is not included in the GIS data, not on the Definitive Map. |
| Gunthorpe (North Norfolk) | BR | 6 | 570 | 725 | +27.2% | 4 | 3y | There is a 130m missing link running NE from northern end of this path and southern end of U14076 Heath Lane, which isn't recorded as a Highway or a Public Right of Way. Surely it should be one or the other, otherwise this route is a dead end. |
| Hockwold-cum-Wilton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BY | 4 | 270 | 323 | +19.6% | 4 | 4y | Statement says route ends at Church Lane, but route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops about 30m metres short. Presumably the intention is/was that the missing link from TL73428775 to TL73478770 is part of Church Lane, but the NCC Highways data suggests otherwise. Without rights over the link, the route is a dead end. |
| Horsey (North Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 595 | 1189 | +99.8% | 4 | 4y | West section of road/track not part of this FP according to GIS data, but not a Public Highway either according to NCC Highways data. |
| Mattishall (Breckland) | FP | 1 | 1192 | 1558 | +30.7% | 4 | 3y | Statement says route ends at "Stone Lane". If this is the C211A "Stone Road", then the GIS data and Definitive Map are missing the last 400m of the route, as it stops at TG03111226. If "Stone Lane" is not the C211A, then there is a gap in the network from TG03111226 to TG02801206, as this track is not recorded as a Public Highway. The segment from TG03111226 to TG02801206 is signed as a Footpath on the ground, and is mapped as such in OSM. |
| Narborough (Breckland) | FP | 1 | 2402 | 2523 | +5.0% | 4 | 2y | Statement suggests route starts from old A47 (now C537) whereas GIS data has the route starting from the end of River Close. Has there been a diversion order? There's evidence of a change being made on the Definitive Map, but no record in the Amendments section. |
| Scole (South Norfolk) | FP | 11 | 295 | 369 | +25.1% | 4 | 20m | Statement says the path ends at St Andrew's Church, but the line in GIS data stops short. |
| South Lopham (Breckland) | FP | 16 | 539 | 600 | +11.3% | 4 | 6y | Definitive Statement says route starts at Brickkiln Lane, but in GIS data, the route stops about 50m W of the lane (U33157). Unclear why, or what the status of the missing segment is. If GIS data is correct, there's a 50m gap on the network between U33157 and the start of the route. |
| Southery (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 481 | 627 | +30.4% | 4 | 3m | Definitive statement says the route should start from Ringmore Drove at junction with FP 7. In GIS data and on Definitive Map, the route starts about 120m NE at the end of the U21393 Black Bank Drove Highway. |
| Swaffham (Breckland) | RB | 47 | 1677 | 1791 | +6.8% | 4 | 4y | GIS data and Definitive Map have route stopping at TF83110711, about 70m short of Watton Road -- the end point in the Statement. The gap between TF83110711 is not recorded as a Highway, so if the GIS data and Defintive Map are correct there's a gap in the PRoW network here. |
| Swaffham (Breckland) | RB | 60 | 838 | 1999 | +138.5% | 4 | 4y | Statement says RB goes from Westacre Road to Fincham Drove. Route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at TF79971021 after less than 850m. If the Map is correct, then this route is a dead end. |
| Swannington (Broadland) | FP | 19 | 586 | 529 | −9.7% | 4 | 3y | GIS data incorrectly has route continuing east to meet FP 16. Statement and Definitive Map state route stops at FP 21. |
| Thetford (Breckland) | FP | 16 | 440 | 403 | −8.4% | 4 | 4y | Route in GIS data crosses the river away from the Middle Stanch bridge. Presumably a modification order is needed to correct the route. |
| Tivetshall St Margaret (South Norfolk) | FP | 15 | 744 | 907 | +21.9% | 4 | 6w | Statement says path starts at Hales Street and ends at NW end of FP 17. In GIS data and on the Definitive Map, the path starts further south and ends at Grove Road. There's a 150m gap in the track between the end of Hales Street at TM15878707 and the start of FP15 at TM15888693 which isn't recorded as a Public Right of Way. Surely there should at least be pedestrian rights on this section. At the S end, it is possible that the discrepancy has been caused by a previous diversion to FP 17. |
| West Dereham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 312 | 424 | +35.9% | 4 | 4y | NE end of mapped route is on former alignment of the main road. This part is not included in the GIS data; is it still a Public Highway? |
| Westwick (North Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 110 | 319 | +190.0% | 4 | 4y | GIS data has not been updated to match new route (approximately 320m long) as indicated in Definitive Statement and on Definitive Map. |
| Parish | Number | LGIS | LOSM | ΔL/L | MS | LE | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swaffham (Breckland) | FP | 25 | 349 | 349 | +0.0% | 2 | 3y | Statement says E end of route is at Norwich Road. In GIS data the route stops short. Definitive Map is inconclusive. |
| Tivetshall St Mary (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 369 | 449 | +21.7% | 2 | 6w | East end is at Church Lane, but this isn't recorded as a Highway or Right of Way. |
| Parish | Number | LGIS | LOSM | ΔL/L | MS | LE | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alburgh (South Norfolk) | FP | 14 | 789 | 774 | −1.9% | 3 | 2y | |
| Alburgh (South Norfolk) | FP | 19 | 105 | 103 | −1.9% | 3 | 4y | |
| Alby with Thwaite (North Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 1021 | 1019 | −0.2% | 3 | 19m | |
| Alby with Thwaite (North Norfolk) | FP | 12 | 391 | 380 | −2.8% | 3 | 2y | |
| Aldborough (North Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 314 | 326 | +3.8% | 3 | 5y | |
| Aldeby (South Norfolk) | FP | 11 | 1167 | 1111 | −4.8% | 3 | 2y | Mapped route lies 50-100m to the north of the definitive line in places. |
| Alpington (South Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 136 | 81 | −40.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Alpington (South Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 900 | 865 | −3.9% | 3 | 2y | |
| Alpington (South Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 359 | 370 | +3.1% | 3 | 2y | |
| Antingham (North Norfolk) | BR | 5 | 562 | 568 | +1.1% | 3 | 3y | |
| Ashby St Mary (South Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 312 | 337 | +8.0% | 3 | 4y | |
| Ashby with Oby (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 4 | 1750 | 1688 | −3.5% | 3 | 4y | |
| Ashill (Breckland) | FP | 6 | 434 | 401 | −7.6% | 3 | 5y | |
| Ashwellthorpe (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 345 | 337 | −2.3% | 3 | 4y | Route mapped not quite aligned with GIS data. |
| Ashwellthorpe (South Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 107 | 116 | +8.4% | 3 | 4y | Route mapped not quite aligned with GIS data. |
| Aslacton (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 480 | 503 | +4.8% | 3 | 12m | Mapped route doesn't follow definitive line from GIS data at east end. |
| Aslacton (South Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 404 | 454 | +12.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Aslacton (South Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 438 | 440 | +0.5% | 3 | 2y | Mapped route possibly the wrong side of the hedge at the E end. |
| Attlebridge (Broadland) | RB | 1 | 1070 | 1080 | +0.9% | 3 | 21m | |
| Attlebridge (Broadland) | RB | 3 | 2302 | 3189 | +38.5% | 3 | 2m | Has been subject to a long-term diversion order for many years around landfill site. Current status uncertain. |
| Attlebridge (Broadland) | FP | 5 | 239 | 267 | +11.7% | 3 | 4y | |
| Aylsham (Broadland) | FP | 7 | 254 | 216 | −15.0% | 3 | 3y | |
| Aylsham (Broadland) | BR | 24 | 517 | 466 | −9.9% | 3 | 3y | May be obstructed making equestrian / bicycle use difficult. |
| Aylsham (Broadland) | FP | 29 | 55 | 45 | −18.2% | 3 | 2y | |
| Baconsthorpe (North Norfolk) | FP | 12 | 573 | 586 | +2.3% | 3 | 3y | Definitive map appears to show route to east of field boundary along entire length. Mapped route in OSM follows a track that switches sides part was along. |
| Bacton (North Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 584 | 576 | −1.4% | 3 | 3y | Middle section should be to the east of the hedge, rather than on the track. |
| Bacton (North Norfolk) | FP | 11 | 1302 | 1301 | −0.1% | 3 | 4y | Kink in the middle is not mapped. |
| Banham (Breckland) | FP | 15 | 707 | 758 | +7.2% | 3 | 8m | |
| Banham (Breckland) | FP | 29 | 678 | 672 | −0.9% | 3 | 7y | |
| Banham (Breckland) | FP | 30 | 2403 | 2412 | +0.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Barton Turf (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 1120 | 1143 | +2.1% | 3 | 4y | |
| Barton Turf (North Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 172 | 180 | +4.7% | 3 | 3y | |
| Bawdeswell (Breckland) | FP | 3 | 336 | 299 | −11.0% | 3 | 5y | Alignment in OSM doesn't match GIS data. |
| Beeston Regis (North Norfolk) | BR | 10 | 1473 | 1442 | −2.1% | 3 | 3m | Mapped route doesn't follow definitive line in a couple of places. |
| Beetley (Breckland) | FP | 6 | 762 | 949 | +24.5% | 3 | 19m | |
| Beetley (Breckland) | FP | 9 | 611 | 739 | +20.9% | 3 | 6m | North end of mapped route does not follow definitive line. |
| Beetley (Breckland) | FP | 12 | 342 | 394 | +15.2% | 3 | 6y | |
| Beighton (Broadland) | FP | 2 | 139 | 137 | −1.4% | 3 | 3y | |
| Binham (North Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 1213 | 1222 | +0.7% | 3 | 3y | Odd that diverted route doesn't follow existing track at the south end. |
| Bintree (Breckland) | FP | 1 | 193 | 223 | +15.5% | 3 | 3y | |
| Bodham (North Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 545 | 553 | +1.5% | 3 | 5y | |
| Bodham (North Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 1111 | 1164 | +4.8% | 3 | 2y | |
| Bracon Ash (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 2048 | 2078 | +1.5% | 3 | 21m | A short section just west of the Church Farm is not on the definitive line in OSM. |
| Bracon Ash (South Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 155 | 101 | −34.8% | 3 | 5w | |
| Bracon Ash (South Norfolk) | FP | 12 | 419 | 327 | −22.0% | 3 | 5y | |
| Bracon Ash (South Norfolk) | FP | 13 | 333 | 340 | +2.1% | 3 | 2y | Mapped route does not follow definitive line at S end. |
| Bracon Ash (South Norfolk) | FP | 15 | 133 | 152 | +14.3% | 3 | 4y | |
| Bradwell (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 20 | 835 | 831 | −0.5% | 3 | 2y | Possible obsrtuction of Definitive line around sub-station, but alternative route exists. Both Statement and GIS Data have the path going around the north and east side of the sub-station (which is probably inaccessible). But the path on the gound goes to the west and south. Definitive Map is unclear, but probably matches the GIS data. |
| Bramerton (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 495 | 531 | +7.3% | 3 | 4w | |
| Bramerton (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 403 | 424 | +5.2% | 3 | 4y | |
| Bramerton (South Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 458 | 414 | −9.6% | 3 | 2y | Mapped route in OSM does not quite follow the GIS data line at W end. |
| Brampton (Broadland) | FP | 1 | 254 | 270 | +6.3% | 3 | 8m | |
| Brampton (Broadland) | FP | 10 | 197 | 176 | −10.7% | 3 | 4y | |
| Bressingham (South Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 1656 | 1721 | +3.9% | 3 | 3y | Mapped section near east end not quite on definitive line. Need to check how field boundaries are crossed. Route blocked by bushes and ditch at east end. See FMS:854506 |
| Brinton (North Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 155 | 159 | +2.6% | 3 | 3y | |
| Brinton (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 244 | 233 | −4.5% | 3 | 3y | |
| Briston (North Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 219 | 255 | +16.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Briston (North Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 502 | 514 | +2.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Briston (North Norfolk) | RB | 5 | 491 | 498 | +1.4% | 3 | 3y | |
| Briston (North Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 532 | 524 | −1.5% | 3 | 5y | |
| Brockdish (South Norfolk) | FP | 11 | 455 | 418 | −8.1% | 3 | 2y | |
| Brockdish (South Norfolk) | FP | 12 | 353 | 347 | −1.7% | 3 | 2y | |
| Broome (South Norfolk) | FP | 14 | 279 | 290 | +3.9% | 3 | 16m | Statement describes complete route for this RoW and adjoining Ditchingham FP 14. GIS data correctly only includes part in this parish. Short part at Southern end slightly mis-aligned in OSM. |
| Burgh Castle (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 3 | 741 | 711 | −4.0% | 3 | 2y | |
| Burnham Market (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 145 | 153 | +5.5% | 3 | 9m | |
| Burnham Overy (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 447 | 467 | +4.5% | 3 | 18m | |
| Burston (South Norfolk) | FP | 14 | 869 | 916 | +5.4% | 3 | 2y | |
| Burston (South Norfolk) | FP | 24 | 232 | 196 | −15.5% | 3 | 2y | |
| Buxton with Lammas (Broadland) | FP | 2 | 478 | 437 | −8.6% | 3 | 3y | |
| Caister-on-Sea (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 6 | 286 | 292 | +2.1% | 3 | 3y | Mapped route appears to be on wrong side of old railway. It should be on the sea-ward side. |
| Cantley (Broadland) | FP | 6 | 720 | 725 | +0.7% | 3 | 4y | |
| Cawston (Broadland) | BR | 11 | 1928 | 2009 | +4.2% | 3 | 9m | One section of definitive line probably obstructed by woodland. Mapped route follows track to east. |
| Claxton (South Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 170 | 177 | +4.1% | 3 | 3y | |
| Claxton (South Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 1295 | 1294 | −0.1% | 3 | 3y | |
| Cley-next-the-Sea (North Norfolk) | FP | 24 | 2442 | 2448 | +0.2% | 3 | 3y | E end not quite on definitive line. |
| Colby (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 413 | 417 | +1.0% | 3 | 4y | |
| Colby (North Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 435 | 443 | +1.8% | 3 | 6y | |
| Coltishall (Broadland) | FP | 2 | 656 | 668 | +1.8% | 3 | 4y | |
| Coltishall (Broadland) | FP | 4 | 186 | 181 | −2.7% | 3 | 4y | |
| Corpusty (North Norfolk) | FP | 16 | 1106 | 1098 | −0.7% | 3 | 3y | Mapped route deviates from Definitive Line at east end. |
| Cranworth (Breckland) | FP | 4 | 1243 | 1250 | +0.6% | 3 | 4y | Statement says route ends at "the Public Highway at High Common". But the Definitive Map and GIS data show the route ending at TF99340550 about 150m short. The track to the road from TF99340550 isn't recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way, making FP 4 a dead end. |
| Cromer (North Norfolk) | FP | 1b | 494 | 495 | +0.2% | 3 | 3y | Mapped route in OSM not quite on Definitive Line |
| Cromer (North Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 239 | 251 | +5.0% | 3 | 4y | |
| Cromer (North Norfolk) | FP | 11 | 919 | 917 | −0.2% | 3 | 3y | History of being obstructed near old Coastguard Station: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/information_on_cromer_fp_11 |
| Crostwick (Broadland) | FP | 1 | 278 | 276 | −0.7% | 3 | 11d | |
| Dereham (Breckland) | FP | 5 | 202 | 221 | +9.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Dereham (Breckland) | FP | 6 | 818 | 316 | −61.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Dilham (North Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 158 | 319 | +101.9% | 3 | 5y | Unclear from Statement where way starts. Route in GIS data does not meet Honing Road. Missing section between end of GIS data and road is not a Public Highway according to NCC data. |
| Diss (South Norfolk) | FP | 11 | 220 | 231 | +5.0% | 3 | 4y | Unclear how path joins track at E end. Line in GIS data shows it passing through buildings. |
| Diss (South Norfolk) | FP | 27 | 587 | 574 | −2.2% | 3 | 2y | |
| East Beckham (North Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 2214 | 2029 | −8.4% | 3 | 2y | |
| East Beckham (North Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 1374 | 1305 | −5.0% | 3 | 19m | Mapped route doesn't follow definitive line through wood and at S end. |
| East Ruston (North Norfolk) | FP | 21 | 321 | 301 | −6.2% | 3 | 5y | |
| East Tuddenham (Breckland) | FP | 8 | 883 | 873 | −1.1% | 3 | 18m | |
| East Tuddenham (Breckland) | FP | 11 | 1014 | 1014 | +0.0% | 3 | 6y | |
| East Walton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 384 | 376 | −2.1% | 3 | 5y | |
| Edgefield (North Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 423 | 458 | +8.3% | 3 | 9m | |
| Elsing (Breckland) | FP | 4 | 383 | 441 | +15.1% | 3 | 2m | |
| Fakenham (North Norfolk) | FP | 19 | 243 | 232 | −4.5% | 3 | 3y | Mapping incorrect at E end. |
| Felmingham (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 1026 | 1002 | −2.3% | 3 | 5y | |
| Field Dalling (North Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 1326 | 1354 | +2.1% | 3 | 3y | |
| Fleggburgh (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 8 | 318 | 333 | +4.7% | 3 | 3y | |
| Flordon (South Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 860 | 925 | +7.6% | 3 | 2y | The mapped route in OSM doesn't quite follow definitive line, but maybe current bridges and stiles are misplaced. |
| Forncett (South Norfolk) | FP | 15 | 1020 | 1060 | +3.9% | 3 | 4y | |
| Forncett (South Norfolk) | FP | 16 | 268 | 299 | +11.6% | 3 | 9m | |
| Forncett (South Norfolk) | FP | 22 | 218 | 226 | +3.7% | 3 | 4y | Mapped route in OSM is significantly off definitive line. |
| Forncett (South Norfolk) | FP | 25 | 621 | 620 | −0.2% | 3 | 4y | |
| Forncett (South Norfolk) | FP | 27 | 395 | 390 | −1.3% | 3 | 4y | |
| Foulsham (Broadland) | FP | 7 | 534 | 548 | +2.6% | 3 | 5y | |
| Foulsham (Broadland) | FP | 9 | 638 | 632 | −0.9% | 3 | 3y | |
| Framingham Pigot (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 184 | 183 | −0.5% | 3 | 2y | The line in the GIS data incorrectly follows a modern track. This route is inconsistent with both the line on the Definitive Map and the description in the Definitive Statement. |
| Gayton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 1617 | 1459 | −9.8% | 3 | 3w | Mapped route at southern end does not follow definitive line through wood. |
| Gillingham (South Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 630 | 630 | +0.0% | 3 | 4y | Mapped route doesn't agree with GIS data at S end. |
| Gimingham (North Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 1398 | 1379 | −1.4% | 3 | 5y | |
| Great Moulton (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 330 | 345 | +4.5% | 3 | 21m | |
| Great Moulton (South Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 397 | 387 | −2.5% | 3 | 2y | Check alignment of mapped route at southern end. |
| Great Witchingham (Broadland) | FP | 4 | 622 | 638 | +2.6% | 3 | 20m | |
| Gresham (North Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 78 | 106 | +35.9% | 3 | 5y | Mapped route is significantly off line of GIS data. |
| Guestwick (Broadland) | FP | 3 | 222 | 243 | +9.5% | 3 | 5y | Mapped route doesn't follow definitive line at S end. |
| Haddiscoe (South Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 2414 | 2433 | +0.8% | 3 | 20m | |
| Hales (South Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 1158 | 1163 | +0.4% | 3 | 5m | |
| Hales (South Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 354 | 311 | −12.1% | 3 | 4m | |
| Halvergate (Broadland) | FP | 7 | 187 | 191 | +2.1% | 3 | 9m | |
| Hanworth (North Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 170 | 168 | −1.2% | 3 | 6y | |
| Happisburgh (North Norfolk) | FP | 24 | 1977 | 1924 | −2.7% | 3 | 8m | Cliff-top path. Mapped route of path on ground does not follow Definitive Line owing to coastal erosion. |
| Hardingham (Breckland) | FP | 11 | 294 | 278 | −5.4% | 3 | 17m | In Statement, the reference to Hingham FP 1 should be Hingham FP 2, and no Hingham path at the E end. In GIS data, why doesn't E end meet with FP 9? Also part of the route shown in the GIS data actually belongs to Hingham FP 11. |
| Harpley (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 495 | 493 | −0.4% | 3 | 3y | |
| Harpley (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 303 | 327 | +7.9% | 3 | 3y | If mapping is correct, then the stiles adjacent to the A148 are not on the definitive line. |
| Haveringland (Broadland) | FP | 2 | 1464 | 1458 | −0.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Heacham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 1916 | 1879 | −1.9% | 3 | 3y | Current sea bank doesn't agree with line in GIS data in two places. Current sea bank doesn't agree with line in GIS data in two places. |
| Hedenham (South Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 334 | 333 | −0.3% | 3 | 4y | |
| Hellington (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 305 | 334 | +9.5% | 3 | 6m | |
| Hempnall (South Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 126 | 173 | +37.3% | 3 | 2y | Line in GIS data does not seem to match line on Definitive Map, and neiter appear consistent with the description in the Statement that the route ends by "enter[ing] the churchyard at its north eastern corner by a stile". |
| Hempnall (South Norfolk) | FP | 13 | 646 | 587 | −9.1% | 3 | 20m | |
| Hempstead (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 2036 | 1977 | −2.9% | 3 | 9m | |
| Hempstead (North Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 314 | 323 | +2.9% | 3 | 9m | The southern end of the mapped route in OSM doesn't appear to follow the Definitive Line. |
| Hempstead (North Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 398 | 409 | +2.8% | 3 | 5y | |
| Hevingham (Broadland) | FP | 3 | 310 | 250 | −19.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Hevingham (Broadland) | FP | 5 | 1148 | 1158 | +0.9% | 3 | 3y | |
| Hickling (North Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 463 | 514 | +11.0% | 3 | 4y | Statement says path runs "to the Green", but the line on the Definitive Map and in the GIS data stops short of this road. |
| Hilgay (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BR | 26 | 9 | 24 | +166.7% | 3 | 4y | According to the Definitive Statement and the GIS data, there's a gap of about 50m between the ends of BR 25 and BR 26. Is this deliberate? What rights are there over the gap? The Definitive Map is inconclusive. |
| Hillington (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BR | 3 | 410 | 434 | +5.9% | 3 | 4y | |
| Hindolveston (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 502 | 522 | +4.0% | 3 | 2y | |
| Hindolveston (North Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 579 | 667 | +15.2% | 3 | 3y | |
| Hingham (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 1387 | 1474 | +6.3% | 3 | 2y | Route ends on parish boundary at TG02190366, but the continuation to join with Hardingham FP 8 at TG02210370 is not recorded as a Public Right of Way. This means this route is a dead end and there is a 40m gap in the Rights of Way network. The Statement for Hingham FP 1 even explicitly says that the route continues and "joins a path leading to Manson Green Farm in the Parish of Hardingham". |
| Hoe (Breckland) | FP | 4 | 359 | 359 | +0.0% | 3 | 5m | |
| Holt (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 357 | 371 | +3.9% | 3 | 2y | |
| Holt (North Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 112 | 97 | −13.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Holt (North Norfolk) | FP | 12 | 489 | 461 | −5.7% | 3 | 3y | |
| Honing (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 427 | 441 | +3.3% | 3 | 3y | |
| Honing (North Norfolk) | FP | 13 | 437 | 148 | −66.1% | 3 | 3y | South-West end is a dead-end at TG33142680 with no continuation in Dilham Parish. |
| Honingham (Broadland) | FP | 2 | 319 | 322 | +0.9% | 3 | 5y | Mapped route does not follow definitive line at NE end. |
| Horsey (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 2434 | 2502 | +2.8% | 3 | 3y | Mapped route in OSM does not follow definitive line at NW end. |
| Ingham (North Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 461 | 490 | +6.3% | 3 | 3y | |
| Itteringham (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 62 | 83 | +33.9% | 3 | 4y | |
| Itteringham (North Norfolk) | FP | 11 | 1475 | 1450 | −1.7% | 3 | 9m | Mapped route doesn't follow definitive line through farmyard. |
| Itteringham (North Norfolk) | FP | 13 | 1266 | 1264 | −0.2% | 3 | 9m | |
| Itteringham (North Norfolk) | FP | 16 | 500 | 464 | −7.2% | 3 | 13m | Definitive line is obstructed by a large pond. |
| Itteringham (North Norfolk) | FP | 18 | 382 | 389 | +1.8% | 3 | 4y | |
| Itteringham (North Norfolk) | FP | 19 | 181 | 179 | −1.1% | 3 | 4y | |
| Kelling (North Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 97 | 97 | +0.0% | 3 | 3y | |
| Kelling (North Norfolk) | FP | 15 | 648 | 648 | +0.0% | 3 | 3y | |
| Ketteringham (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 607 | 596 | −1.8% | 3 | 4y | |
| Ketteringham (South Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 722 | 732 | +1.4% | 3 | 21m | Definitive Map and Statement both have this route to the west of the field boundary, but the path mapped in OSM is to the east. |
| Kirby Bedon (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 145 | 149 | +2.8% | 3 | 4y | |
| Kirby Cane (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 395 | 417 | +5.6% | 3 | 4y | |
| Kirstead (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 420 | 452 | +7.6% | 3 | 19m | |
| Kirstead (South Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 295 | 265 | −10.2% | 3 | 19m | |
| Kirstead (South Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 802 | 813 | +1.4% | 3 | 4w | |
| Knapton (North Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 1321 | 1358 | +2.8% | 3 | 5y | 1km section is part of FP 6 on Definitive Map and GIS data, but part of FP 8 in the Definitive Statement. |
| Knapton (North Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 177 | 183 | +3.4% | 3 | 5y | 1km section is part of FP 6 on Definitive Map and GIS data, but part of FP 8 in the Definitive Statement. |
| Lessingham (North Norfolk) | FP | 16 | 1271 | 1250 | −1.7% | 3 | 5y | |
| Leziate (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 833 | 891 | +7.0% | 3 | 5y | |
| Little Barningham (North Norfolk) | BR | 1 | 318 | 304 | −4.4% | 3 | 19m | |
| Little Ellingham (Breckland) | FP | 2 | 860 | 868 | +0.9% | 3 | 8m | Need to check paths at SE end of common. |
| Little Walsingham (North Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 500 | 505 | +1.0% | 3 | 12m | |
| Little Witchingham (Broadland) | FP | 2 | 678 | 677 | −0.1% | 3 | 3y | |
| Loddon (South Norfolk) | FP | 15 | 738 | 623 | −15.6% | 3 | 17m | |
| Loddon (South Norfolk) | FP | 20 | 371 | 333 | −10.2% | 3 | 4y | In Statement, 'Mundford' should be 'Mundham'. |
| Long Stratton (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 230 | 252 | +9.6% | 3 | 2m | |
| Long Stratton (South Norfolk) | FP | 19 | 476 | 450 | −5.5% | 3 | 4y | |
| Ludham (North Norfolk) | RB | 25 | 499 | 487 | −2.4% | 3 | 3y | Slight discrepancy between mapped route and definitive line at SE end. |
| Ludham (North Norfolk) | FP | 26 | 1669 | 1647 | −1.3% | 3 | 2y | Shown as FP on Definitive Map and in GIS data, but as RB in Statement. Mapped route in OSM at NW end does not quite agree with GIS data / definitive map. |
| Ludham (North Norfolk) | RB | 34 | 229 | 228 | −0.4% | 3 | 3y | |
| Marham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BR | 5 | 813 | 757 | −6.9% | 3 | 2y | |
| Marlingford (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 1113 | 1139 | +2.3% | 3 | 3m | |
| Marlingford (South Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 114 | 135 | +18.4% | 3 | 5y | |
| Marlingford (South Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 1498 | 1427 | −4.7% | 3 | 2y | Mapped route of middle section in OSM does not follow the Definitive Line. |
| Marsham (Broadland) | FP | 1 | 1256 | 1252 | −0.3% | 3 | 8m | |
| Marsham (Broadland) | FP | 14 | 1057 | 1081 | +2.3% | 3 | 3m | Mapped route in OSM does not quite follow definitive line. Western end should be checked. |
| Marsham (Broadland) | RB | 16 | 705 | 728 | +3.3% | 3 | 2y | |
| Marsham (Broadland) | FP | 17 | 381 | 356 | −6.6% | 3 | 4y | |
| Marsham (Broadland) | RB | 18 | 2404 | 2438 | +1.4% | 3 | 8m | |
| Marsham (Broadland) | FP | 19 | 1716 | 1603 | −6.6% | 3 | 4y | |
| Marsham (Broadland) | FP | 23 | 465 | 484 | +4.1% | 3 | 21m | |
| Marsham (Broadland) | FP | 24 | 734 | 703 | −4.2% | 3 | 8m | |
| Marsham (Broadland) | FP | 25 | 532 | 512 | −3.8% | 3 | 8m | |
| Marsham (Broadland) | FP | 27 | 468 | 489 | +4.5% | 3 | 6y | |
| Matlask (North Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 1139 | 1170 | +2.7% | 3 | 19m | |
| Mattishall (Breckland) | FP | 9 | 770 | 829 | +7.7% | 3 | 21m | |
| Mattishall (Breckland) | FP | 21 | 388 | 332 | −14.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Mautby (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 9 | 607 | 600 | −1.2% | 3 | 4y | Mapped route doesn't quite follow the Definitive Line at the east end. |
| Mautby (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 14 | 901 | 902 | +0.1% | 3 | 8m | Mapped route does not quite follow the Definitive Line at the SE end. |
| Mautby (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 16 | 593 | 595 | +0.3% | 3 | 19m | Definitive Line appears to be obstructed by drainage channel, but bridge nearby provides and alternative route. |
| Mautby (Great Yarmouth) | BR | 17 | 644 | 626 | −2.8% | 3 | 16m | Mapped route on modern track doesn't quite follow Definitive Line. |
| Morningthorpe (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 224 | 246 | +9.8% | 3 | 5m | |
| Morningthorpe (South Norfolk) | FP | 16 | 833 | 890 | +6.8% | 3 | 14m | |
| Mulbarton (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 525 | 585 | +11.4% | 3 | 3y | |
| Mulbarton (South Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 771 | 779 | +1.0% | 3 | 4y | |
| Neatishead (North Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 218 | 224 | +2.8% | 3 | 3y | Statement ends with "runs southwards to Footpath No. 8". Presumably this is a transcription error, being a repetition of the end of the statement for FP 7. The route should "runs southwards to Mill Loke." Mill Loke/Lane is not recorded as a Public Highway or Right of Way, so the southern end of this route at TG34051946 is legally a dead end. |
| Neatishead (North Norfolk) | FP | 13 | 228 | 240 | +5.3% | 3 | 4y | |
| Needham (South Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 155 | 161 | +3.9% | 3 | 2y | Definitive line probably obstructed. |
| Needham (South Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 189 | 169 | −10.6% | 3 | 4y | |
| Newton by Castle Acre (Breckland) | FP | 4 | 176 | 178 | +1.1% | 3 | 4y | |
| North Walsham (North Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 1021 | 1028 | +0.7% | 3 | 5y | |
| North Walsham (North Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 519 | 509 | −1.9% | 3 | 5y | |
| North Walsham (North Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 642 | 627 | −2.3% | 3 | 5y | |
| North Walsham (North Norfolk) | FP | 15 | 1170 | 1180 | +0.9% | 3 | 6y | |
| Northrepps (North Norfolk) | FP | 17 | 88 | — | 3 | 3y | Recorded in Statement as FP, but missing from GIS data. Definitive Map shows route as a short link at the S end of Roughton FP 2. In the GIS data, this segment is erroneously included as part of Roughton FP 2. | |
| Ormesby St Margaret with Scratby (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 1 | 832 | 886 | +6.5% | 3 | 3y | |
| Ormesby St Margaret with Scratby (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 3 | 310 | 320 | +3.2% | 3 | 2y | There is a kink in Definitive Line in the GIS data near northern end of gaveyard, which is not reflected in the mapped route in OSM. |
| Oulton (Broadland) | FP | 1 | 377 | 392 | +4.0% | 3 | 10m | |
| Oulton (Broadland) | FP | 4 | 669 | 650 | −2.8% | 3 | 10m | |
| Oulton (Broadland) | FP | 5 | 181 | 189 | +4.4% | 3 | 10m | |
| Overstrand (North Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 1077 | 1095 | +1.7% | 3 | 3y | Cliff-top erosion means the path is now slightly inland from the original Definitive Line. Mapped path follows route available on the ground. |
| Paston (North Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 218 | 218 | +0.0% | 3 | 4y | |
| Paston (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 950 | 872 | −8.2% | 3 | 4y | |
| Pentney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | RB | 16 | 137 | 161 | +17.5% | 3 | 3y | |
| Pentney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | RB | 16a | 1559 | 1372 | −12.0% | 3 | 2y | |
| Pentney (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 22 | 186 | 253 | +36.0% | 3 | 4y | |
| Plumstead (North Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 457 | 459 | +0.4% | 3 | 3y | Mapped route not on Definitive Line; should it actually run to the east of the hedge? |
| Poringland (South Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 586 | 597 | +1.9% | 3 | 5m | West end at TG25980154 is not on a public highway according to the NCC highways data. See FP 1. Mapped route also doesn't follow line of GIS data near W end. |
| Poringland (South Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 483 | 480 | −0.6% | 3 | 3y | |
| Potter Heigham (North Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 585 | 582 | −0.5% | 3 | 3y | |
| Pulham Market (South Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 1047 | 1070 | +2.2% | 3 | 3y | |
| Rackheath (Broadland) | FP | 4 | 395 | 409 | +3.5% | 3 | 5y | |
| Rackheath (Broadland) | FP | 5 | 1330 | 1315 | −1.1% | 3 | 4m | |
| Reedham (Broadland) | FP | 13 | 1443 | 1500 | +4.0% | 3 | 2w | |
| Repps with Bastwick (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 1 | 689 | 696 | +1.0% | 3 | 3y | |
| Ringland (Broadland) | FP | 4 | 811 | 808 | −0.4% | 3 | 13m | Currently mapped route is to the west of the field boundary. NCC GIS data and Definitive Map suggest route should go up the main drive to the east of the boundary. |
| Ringland (Broadland) | FP | 7 | 432 | 435 | +0.7% | 3 | 5y | |
| Ringland (Broadland) | FP | 8 | 149 | 160 | +7.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Ringland (Broadland) | FP | 9 | 523 | 522 | −0.2% | 3 | 4y | |
| Roughton (North Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 1220 | 1136 | −6.9% | 3 | 3y | GIS data erroneously includes an extra section at the S end of this route, which should be Northrepps FP 17 according to the Definitive Map and Statement. |
| Runhall (South Norfolk) | FP | 18 | 640 | 645 | +0.8% | 3 | 6y | Mapped route doesn't follow line from GIS data at E end. |
| Runton (North Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 1000 | 1035 | +3.5% | 3 | 4y | |
| Runton (North Norfolk) | RB | 12 | 664 | 667 | +0.5% | 3 | 2y | Mapped route shows small deviation from GIS data at southern end. |
| Runton (North Norfolk) | FP | 18 | 722 | 716 | −0.8% | 3 | 3y | Small deviation in mapped route near southern end. |
| Runton (North Norfolk) | FP | 23 | 1001 | 988 | −1.3% | 3 | 3y | |
| Salhouse (Broadland) | FP | 4 | 668 | 674 | +0.9% | 3 | 18m | |
| Salhouse (Broadland) | FP | 5 | 666 | 678 | +1.8% | 3 | 18m | |
| Salhouse (Broadland) | FP | 14 | 1022 | 1034 | +1.2% | 3 | 11m | Mapped route doesn't quite follow definitive line at the kink in the middle. |
| Salle (Broadland) | FP | 3 | 1197 | 1199 | +0.2% | 3 | 2y | |
| Salle (Broadland) | FP | 12 | 898 | 905 | +0.8% | 3 | 3y | |
| Salthouse (North Norfolk) | FP | 16 | 3078 | 3068 | −0.3% | 3 | 3y | |
| Saxlingham Nethergate (South Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 713 | 746 | +4.6% | 3 | 7w | Mapped route doesn't quite follow definitive at S end. |
| Saxlingham Nethergate (South Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 835 | 817 | −2.2% | 3 | 3y | Mapped route doesn't quite follow definitive at N end. |
| Saxlingham Nethergate (South Norfolk) | FP | 12 | 1301 | 1349 | +3.7% | 3 | 11m | Mapped route in OSM contains a deviation that's not part of the definitive line. |
| Saxlingham Nethergate (South Norfolk) | FP | 26 | 1522 | 1480 | −2.8% | 3 | 7d | Mapped route in OSM follows path on ground between TM21899661 and TM21689623, but this doesn't agree with the Definitive Map and GIS data. I suspect the OSM route is correct, and the recently diverted route for that section simply wasn't recorded accurately on the Definitive Map. |
| Saxlingham Nethergate (South Norfolk) | FP | 29 | 633 | 542 | −14.4% | 3 | 7m | According to the GIS data this overlaps with some of RB 24 for a bit. Definitive Statement is ambiguous. |
| Scole (South Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 447 | 443 | −0.9% | 3 | 7m | |
| Scole (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 481 | 540 | +12.3% | 3 | 7m | Definitive line seems to be to west of boundary on norther section, but line mapped in OSM is to the East. |
| Scole (South Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 1338 | 1385 | +3.5% | 3 | 7m | |
| Scole (South Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 779 | 758 | −2.7% | 3 | 7m | Mapped route deviates from the definitive line near the electricity pylon at TM13898017. Route obstructed by hedge at TM13878027. |
| Scole (South Norfolk) | FP | 21 | 1055 | 1042 | −1.2% | 3 | 2y | |
| Scole (South Norfolk) | FP | 23 | 1160 | 1186 | +2.2% | 3 | 6m | In at least two places, the mapped route in OSM does not follow the Definitive Line. |
| Scole (South Norfolk) | FP | 30 | 164 | 188 | +14.6% | 3 | 2y | |
| Seething (South Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 482 | 497 | +3.1% | 3 | 19m | Accidental repetition of "Kirstead Footpath No. 4 at its junction with" in Statement. |
| Seething (South Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 352 | 344 | −2.3% | 3 | 4y | |
| Shelfanger (South Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 68 | 85 | +25.0% | 3 | 2y | |
| Shelton (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 579 | 576 | −0.5% | 3 | 19m | Mapped route in OSM doesn't quite follow definitive line at S end. |
| Sheringham (North Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 747 | 742 | −0.7% | 3 | 3y | Road at western end linking path at TG16394339 to Vincent Road at TG16334337 is not recorded as a Public Highway or a Right of Way, leaving a gap in the network. |
| Sheringham (North Norfolk) | FP | 26 | 1194 | 1256 | +5.2% | 3 | 3y | Statement clearly describes the route running south along the western boundary of the pond to join the Esplanade. But this section is missing from the Definitive Map and the GIS data. |
| Shipdham (Breckland) | BR | 15 | 784 | 774 | −1.3% | 3 | 9m | Route in GIS data runs through residential buildings. Has it been diverted? Oddly, GIS data for route was updated 2016-06-27, but route appears unaltered. Definitive map shows diversion to current line made in January 2003, but lines on map appear to have been drawn carelessly. |
| Shipdham (Breckland) | BR | 16 | 141 | 176 | +24.8% | 3 | 9m | Route in GIS data runs through residential buildings. Has it been diverted? Oddly, GIS data for route was updated 2016-06-27, but route appears unaltered. Definitive map shows diversion to current line made in January 2003, but lines on map appear to have been drawn carelessly. |
| Shotesham (South Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 868 | 880 | +1.4% | 3 | 10m | |
| Shotesham (South Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 894 | 888 | −0.7% | 3 | 3y | |
| Shotesham (South Norfolk) | FP | 17 | 961 | 962 | +0.1% | 3 | 8m | |
| Shropham (Breckland) | FP | 3 | 1455 | 1501 | +3.2% | 3 | 12m | Mapped route on OSM doesn't follow definitive line at S end. |
| Skeyton (North Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 417 | 432 | +3.6% | 3 | 4y | |
| Skeyton (North Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 225 | 262 | +16.4% | 3 | 3y | |
| Skeyton (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 92 | 94 | +2.2% | 3 | 3y | |
| Sloley (North Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 538 | 548 | +1.9% | 3 | 2y | Route in OSM doesn't follow Definitive Line through northern-most field. |
| Sloley (North Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 168 | 191 | +13.7% | 3 | 5y | |
| Snettisham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BR | 13 | 619 | 622 | +0.5% | 3 | 5m | Something is wrong with the description: "runs for approximately 2.7 metres to the north east for a distance of approximately 198 metres". |
| Southrepps (North Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 412 | 408 | −1.0% | 3 | 6y | |
| Southrepps (North Norfolk) | FP | 18 | 373 | 353 | −5.4% | 3 | 6y | |
| Sporle with Palgrave (Breckland) | BR | 1 | 807 | 865 | +7.2% | 3 | 2y | Doesn't quite follow definitive line at W end. |
| Starston (South Norfolk) | FP | 17 | 256 | 249 | −2.7% | 3 | 4y | GIS data shows the path to run south of the pond at the E end, but currently mapped passing to the north of it. |
| Starston (South Norfolk) | FP | 18 | 92 | 88 | −4.3% | 3 | 2y | Definitive line obstructed. Route should be further south than currently mapped in OSM. |
| Starston (South Norfolk) | FP | 19 | 697 | 688 | −1.3% | 3 | 2y | Route should join FP 18 further south than currently mapped in OSM. |
| Stoke Ferry (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | BR | 10 | 4915 | 5228 | +6.4% | 3 | 3y | |
| Stoke Holy Cross (South Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 428 | 477 | +11.4% | 3 | 8m | Route mapped in OSM does not quite follow the Definitive Line. |
| Stratton Strawless (Broadland) | FP | 3 | 543 | 547 | +0.7% | 3 | 3y | Slight kink in mapped route near NW end. |
| Strumpshaw (Broadland) | FP | 6 | 450 | 485 | +7.8% | 3 | 17m | |
| Strumpshaw (Broadland) | FP | 8 | 276 | 241 | −12.7% | 3 | 17m | |
| Strumpshaw (Broadland) | FP | 11 | 188 | 176 | −6.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Strumpshaw (Broadland) | FP | 13 | 526 | 536 | +1.9% | 3 | 17m | |
| Strumpshaw (Broadland) | FP | 16 | 580 | 540 | −6.9% | 3 | 17m | |
| Suffield (North Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 781 | 813 | +4.1% | 3 | 6y | Mapped route not quite on definitive line at S end. |
| Suffield (North Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 967 | 951 | −1.7% | 3 | 8m | North end along farm drive not on definitive line. |
| Sustead (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 692 | 726 | +4.9% | 3 | 5y | |
| Sustead (North Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 623 | 607 | −2.6% | 3 | 2y | |
| Sustead (North Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 508 | 515 | +1.4% | 3 | 2y | |
| Swannington (Broadland) | FP | 2 | 161 | 156 | −3.1% | 3 | 11m | |
| Swannington (Broadland) | FP | 10 | 526 | 514 | −2.3% | 3 | 3w | |
| Swannington (Broadland) | FP | 11 | 229 | 233 | +1.7% | 3 | 5y | |
| Swanton Abbott (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 78 | 93 | +19.2% | 3 | 8m | |
| Swanton Abbott (North Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 185 | 191 | +3.2% | 3 | 3y | South end is a dead end. Statement says route starts on Brake Farm Road, but this isn't a Right of Way or Highway. Surely there should be at least pedestrian rights on the section linking this with FP 8. |
| Swanton Novers (North Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 601 | 615 | +2.3% | 3 | 3y | |
| Swardeston (South Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 916 | 948 | +3.5% | 3 | 17m | |
| Tacolneston (South Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 1424 | 1441 | +1.2% | 3 | 19m | |
| Tacolneston (South Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 513 | 495 | −3.5% | 3 | 2y | GIS data shows the N half to the W of the wood. Statement not specific, but mapped route is in the wood. |
| Tasburgh (South Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 214 | 260 | +21.5% | 3 | 17m | |
| Tharston (South Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 316 | 278 | −12.0% | 3 | 11m | |
| Tharston (South Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 1731 | 1767 | +2.1% | 3 | 9m | |
| Tharston (South Norfolk) | BR | 16 | 442 | 454 | +2.7% | 3 | 4w | GIS data has the E-W section being straight, mapped route in OSM has a bend part way along. |
| Thorpe St Andrew (Broadland) | FP | 6 | 440 | 420 | −4.5% | 3 | 3y | |
| Tibenham (South Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 309 | 327 | +5.8% | 3 | 9m | |
| Tibenham (South Norfolk) | FP | 20 | 1362 | 1237 | −9.2% | 3 | 4y | |
| Topcroft (South Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 524 | 548 | +4.6% | 3 | 4y | |
| Topcroft (South Norfolk) | FP | 9 | 861 | 900 | +4.5% | 3 | 10m | Definitive Statement says route enters Topcroft Street, but in GIS data and the Definitive map the route stops 30m short of the main highway. If the GIS data is correct, the link between the ed of the Right of Way and Topcroft Street is a gap in the nework as it's not recorded as a Public Highway on the NCC online map. |
| Trimingham (North Norfolk) | FP | 4 | 881 | 912 | +3.5% | 3 | 3y | Mapped route in OSM does not follow definitive line through farm. |
| Trimingham (North Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 216 | 245 | +13.4% | 3 | 3y | |
| Wacton (South Norfolk) | FP | 12 | 293 | 290 | −1.0% | 3 | 2y | |
| West Caister (Great Yarmouth) | FP | 2 | 276 | 301 | +9.1% | 3 | 4y | |
| West Dereham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 1 | 1390 | 1380 | −0.7% | 3 | 4y | |
| West Dereham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 887 | 915 | +3.2% | 3 | 5y | |
| West Rudham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 186 | 221 | +18.8% | 3 | 4y | |
| Weston Longville (Broadland) | FP | 1 | 1426 | 1407 | −1.3% | 3 | 5m | |
| Weybourne (North Norfolk) | FP | 5 | 704 | 734 | +4.3% | 3 | 2y | |
| Weybourne (North Norfolk) | FP | 7 | 3264 | 3223 | −1.3% | 3 | 5w | |
| Whinburgh (Breckland) | FP | 3 | 1341 | 1374 | +2.5% | 3 | 4y | |
| Whinburgh (Breckland) | FP | 6 | 1502 | 1516 | +0.9% | 3 | 7m | |
| Wickmere (North Norfolk) | FP | 3 | 821 | 838 | +2.1% | 3 | 3y | |
| Wickmere (North Norfolk) | FP | 6 | 1142 | 1132 | −0.9% | 3 | 5y | Bridge over stream near N end is not on the Definitive line. |
| Winfarthing (South Norfolk) | BR | 19 | 659 | 659 | +0.0% | 3 | 2y | |
| Wood Norton (North Norfolk) | FP | 2 | 1570 | 1570 | +0.0% | 3 | 3y | |
| Worstead (North Norfolk) | FP | 8 | 588 | 596 | +1.4% | 3 | 4y | |
| Wreningham (South Norfolk) | FP | 10 | 138 | 174 | +26.1% | 3 | 4y | |
| Wymondham (South Norfolk) | FP | 18 | 559 | 576 | +3.0% | 3 | 8m | |
No RoWs found with this issue