You are in: Rob's OSM Stuff » UK PRoW » Progress » Norfolk » Discrepancies

Definitive Map and Statement Discrepancies in Norfolk

This page lists discrepancies between the electronic Definitive Statements and the GIS data of Public Rights of Way provided by Norfolk Council (disclaimer / copyright information). Instances are show below where:

To date, the Definitive Statements have been manually checked for 546 out of 546 parishes in the county, and 382 discrepancies have been identified.

Acle (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   GIS data has the route terminate at the boundary in the middle of the river, Definitive Statement says "at Stokesby Ferry".

Alburgh (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 10 1 1   Statement says route ends at Alburgh Street, but on the Definitive Map and in the GIS data it stops at the junction with FP 20. FP 20 (Vinegar Lane) then completes the link to Alburgh Street.

Alby with Thwaite (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 10 0 1   Recorded as FP in Statement, but as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map.
BR 10 1 0   Recorded as FP in Statement, but as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map.

Ashby with Oby (Great Yarmouth)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 6 1 1   Statement says route is 203m long, but in GIS data it is only 53m. Definitive map shows longer route, consistent with the Statement, so presumably the GIS data is wrong.

Ashill (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 11 0 1   Listed as BR in Definitive Statement. Shown as RB in GIS data, and mapped as such in OSM. Definitive Map shows route as RB. Amendment notes on sheet TF90NW, it says CRB 11 was re-classified as BR in October 1997, but this was later quashed in December 1998.
RB 11 1 0   Listed as BR in Definitive Statement. Shown as RB in GIS data, and mapped as such in OSM. Definitive Map shows route as RB. Amendment notes on sheet TF90NW, it says CRB 11 was re-classified as BR in October 1997, but this was later quashed in December 1998.

Attleborough (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 3 0 1   Listed in Definitive Statement, but not in GIS data. However, whole length of Warrens Lane is in the List of Streets as Unclassified Highway U33116. No sign it was ever included or removed from the current Definitive Map.
BR 4 1 1   Statment implies route starts from TM03069628 (on the old Attleborough Road, which is still a Public Highway, the U35334) and runs to TM02459589. The GIS data only includes SW third of this route (from TM02799589 to TM02459589). The Definitive Map agrees with GIS data.
BR 8 1 0   Listed in Definitive Statement as BY, but in GIS data as BR. Statement hasn't been updated yet for FP8a at southern railway crossing. GIS erroneously contians the section between TM03849344 and TM03989358 making it too long by about 200m.
BY 8 0 1   Listed in Definitive Statement as BY, but in GIS data as BR. Statement hasn't been updated yet for FP8a at southern railway crossing.

Aylmerton (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 0 1   Listed as RB in GIS data, but FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as CRF on Definitive Map.
RB 11 1 0   Listed as RB in GIS data, but FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as CRF on Definitive Map.
FP 12 0 1   Listed as RB in GIS data, but FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as CRF on Definitive Map.
RB 12 1 0   Listed as RB in GIS data, but FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as CRF on Definitive Map.

Aylsham (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 28 0 1   Listed as RB in Statement, but missing from GIS Data. Doesn't appear on Definitive Map, and description appears to pre-date 1991 modification to FP 6. Was it removed at the same time? Regardless, the route is currently a Public Highway: U57205 The Meadows.
FP 30 0 1   Appears in Statement, but description is a duplicate of FP6. No FP 30 in GIS data, and unclear if this relates to the BR 30 that is there.
BR 30 1 0   Line recorded in GIS data from Abbots Lane to the junction of Church Lane and the A140. This is also present on the Definitive Map, although in the modifications section there's a note saying BR 30 was deleted in 1991-09. No Statement for this route, though there is an entry for an FP 30.

Bacton (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 2 1 1   Statement does not include the SW-NE section that is present on the Definitive Map.

Banham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 24 1 0   Missing from Definitive Statement but present in GIS data as FP.
FP 32 0 1   Route along Park Common Lane from TM05348749 to TM05098708. Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but referred to as RB in Banham BR 21 and Kenninghall RB 22. Missing from GIS data and Definitive Map. Also recorded in List of Streets as U33208.

Barton Bendish (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Statement says that the route ends at a public highway. But the line in the GIS data ends at TF71010546, and the U21369 Score House Lane only goes as far as TF71040541.

Beeston Regis (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 13 1 1   Statement says route runs to the "parish boundary". Definitive Map shows the route ending on an old boundary that's since been removed. But there is no continuation shown on the other side of the boundary. Presumably the route should join with Beeston Regis FP 19.

Bradwell (Great Yarmouth)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Definitive Statement records path no 3 as part FP part BR. All recorded as BR in GIS data. Should be split into 3A and 3B.
BR 3 0 1   Definitive Statement records path no 3 as part FP part BR. All recorded as BR in GIS data. Should be split into 3A and 3B.
FP 20 1 1   Both Statement and GIS Data have the path going around the north and east side of the sub-station (which is probably inaccessible). But the path on the gound goes to the west and south. Definitive Map is unclear, but probably matches the GIS data.

Brampton (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5 1 0   Present in GIS data and Definitive Map as FP. Missing from Statement.

Brancaster (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 11 1 0   Present in GIS data as RB; missing from Definitive Statement.
RB 18 0 1   Present in Statement as RB, but missing from GIS data and Definitive Map. Assumed to be the route in OSM mapped as "Brancaster Common Lane".
FP 21 0 1   Present in Statement as FP, but missing from GIS data and Definitive Map.

Bressingham (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 24 1 1   Route signed on ground does not match Definitive Statement and GIS data. Apparently a Diversion Order for new route was prepared and passed, but due to an administrative oversight the legal process never finally completed. This also applies to South Lopham FP 17.
FP 33 1 1   GIS data and Definitive Map include an E-W section in FP33, which is part of FP34 according to the Statement.
FP 34 1 1   In Statement reference to "FP 37" should be "FP 7". In the GIS data and Definitive Map, the E-W part described in the statement for FP34 is assigned to FP33 instead.

Brisley (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 15 1 1   Part of the description in the Definitive Statement is missing.

Briston (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Statement says route starts from "Ridland's Road, west of the railway", but in the GIS data, the route starts 50m from the road. Historic OS mapping suggests the missing link may have been a spur, but this isn't recorded as a Highway in the NCC online map.
RB 13 1 1   Statement says route starts from Hellpit Lane, but line in GIS data only starts about 40m from the road.

Brockdish (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Statement says southern section runs in an arable field, whereas GIS data has it following a route through the adjacent wood.
FP 6 1 1   GIS data and Definitive Map have FP6 and FP6a the other way round from the Statement.
FP 6a 1 1  
FP 16 1 1   Description in Statement does not match route in GIS data and on Definitive Map. The route there seems to be only the north-western part. Has the route been modified and the statement not updated?
FP 17 1 1   Description in Statement does appear to match route in GIS data and on Definitive Map. It would do if FP 16 continued SE along the unrecorded track shown on the Definitive Map.

Broome (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 14 1 1   Statement describes complete route for this RoW and adjoining Ditchingham FP 14. GIS data correctly only includes part in this parish. Short part at Southern end slightly mis-aligned in OSM.

Brundall (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   First line of statement says path ends at Highfield Avenue, but not correct following modification. Later description correctly describes shortened route. Also FP1 and FP1A are the opposite way round in the GIS data.
FP 1a 1 1   FP1 and FP1A are the opposite way round in the Statement and GIS data.

Burnham Market (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 8 0 0 * Present in Definitive Statement and GIS data as RB prior to 2018, as route along Cross Lane between TF83084266 and TF83524273, but both entries have since been deleted. Unclear as to why. Evidence of removal from Definitive Map, but no entry in amendments table. Referenced in TRO doc at https://tro.trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk/TRO/Kings%20Lynn%20and%20West%20Norfolk/KZ85.pdf .

Burnham Norton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5 1 1   Statement says route starts from RB 8, but line in GIS data starts about 30m away. This is how it's shown in on the Definitive Map, but I assume that the highway boundary of RB 8 is that wide at that point.

Burnham Overy (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 1 1   Statement says path continues to West Harbour Way, but route in GIS data stops short by 200m. Definitive Map appears to have been altered to shorten the length, but there's no record in the Amendments table.

Burnham Thorpe (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 10 1 0   Recorded as FP in GIS data, and clearly shown on Definitive Map. Missing from Statement. It is referred to in the description for FP 9 though.

Burston (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as BR on Definitive Map and in GIS data, and referred to as such from other RoW Statements.
BR 5 1 0   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as BR on Definitive Map and in GIS data, and referred to as such from other RoW Statements.
FP 23 1 1   There is an erroneous repetition of "Footpath No. 24 to join the northern end of" in the Definitive Statement.

Buxton with Lammas (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 0 1   Listed in Definitive Statement, but missing from GIS data and Definitive Map. From FP 5 Statement, the route is/was along Stracey Road. May have been deleted in 1995-09 when FP 5 was modified, but this isn't mentioned in the Definitive Map Amendments.

Cantley (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 7 1 1   Statement says that the south end of the route "joins the highway", but the the GIS data and Definitive map show the route ending at TG37480452.
FP 19 1 1   Route in GIS data is slightly incorrect near TG38810309. The GIS data follows the modern road, whereas on the Definitive map the route continues straight to the river.
FP 26 1 0   Included as FP in GIS data, but missing from Definitive Map and Definitive Statement as of 2016-08.

Castle Rising (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 18 1 1   Description in Statement says route follows just north of boundary line of the Hall, but line in GIS data cuts straight through Hall grounds. GIS data matches Definitive Map, where boundary of Hall not clear.

Chedgrave (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 1 1   The GIS data shows this route starting south of RB 7. But the Statement says both RB 7 and RB 1 meet it. The Definitive Map clearly shows FP4 starting from the end of RB1 at TM36379940, so the GIS data for FP4 is incorrect.

Corpusty (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 24 1 1   The B1354 referred to in the statement is now the C593. On the Definitive Map, the route is shown correctly on sheet TG13SW, but the southern part is missing completely from sheet TG12NW. The GIS records the whole route.

Costessey (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 10 1 1   Listed as BR in Definitive Statement but FP in GIS data and on Definitive Map.
BR 10 0 1   Listed as BR in Definitive Statement but FP in GIS data and on Definitive Map. Grid references in Statement should be TG not TF.

Cranworth (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 1 1   Statement says route ends at "the Public Highway at High Common". But the Definitive Map and GIS data show the route ending at TF99340550 about 150m short.

Cringleford (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Definitive Statement says route ends at Cantley Lane, but line in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops half-way.

Cromer (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Statement says route starts from the East end of Tucker Street, which is at TG22044222 according to the NCC online highways map. However, the route on the Definitive Map and GIS data starts about 30m further east at TG22074221.

Crostwick (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 3 0 1   Listed in Statement as RB, but missing from Definitive Map and GIS data. The route of Dow Lane is recorded as Unclassified Highway U57185 on the NCC Online map. The Definitive Map shows signs of the route being removed, but there's no corresponding entry in the Amendments list.

Denton (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Definitive Statement says the route starts from the "Public Highway at Great Green". GIS data and Definitive Map have it starting at TM27768959, which is 160m S of the U76155 Darrow Green Road at the end of a Track
FP 21 1 0   Present as FP in GIS data, but missing from Definitive Statement.
BR 22 1 0   Present as BR in GIS data, but missing from Definitive Statement.
BR 23 1 0   Present as BR in GIS data, but missing from Definitive Statement. Definitive Map Amendments list says route added November 1989.
FP 24 1 0   Present as FP in GIS data, but missing from Definitive Statement. Definitive Map Amendments list says route added November 1989.
BR 25 1 0   Present as BR in GIS data, but missing from Definitive Statement. Definitive Map Amendments list says route added November 1989.

Denver (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 4 1 1   The Definitive Statement (dated 2002) is clear that S end is at Sluice Road beyond junction with FP 6. Route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at FP 6. Missing section is also the U21364.
BR 12 1 1   Route in GIS data erroneously includes Downham West BR 12 as well.
BR 14 1 1   Statement and GIS route pre-date Relief Channel -- route crosses this with no bridge! Presumably the route should have been diverted, but was it?
FP 20 0 1   Recorded as FP in Statement, but RB in GIS data. Shown as CRF (hence RB) on Definitive Map.
RB 20 1 0   Recorded as FP in Statement, but RB in GIS data. Shown as CRF (hence RB) on Definitive Map.

Dereham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 14 1 1   Part of the route to the south of the A47 is included in the GIS data, when it should be under FP 14a.
FP 14a 1 1   Although the statement is not clear, I think this route should go all the way from the A47 to Stone Road at TF98161193. This means that Part of this route is recorded as FP 14 in the GIS data.
FP 22 1 1   Should this path continue in Hoe Parish to meet the U35131? According to the GIS data it doesn't, and there's no such path in the Statement for Hoe. But the Statement for this path does refer to the "entire length" of Green Lane.

Dersingham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 13 0 1   Recorded as FP in the Definitive Statement, but RB in the GIS data and CRB on the Definitive map.
RB 13 1 0   Recorded as FP in the Definitive Statement, but RB in the GIS data and CRB on the Definitive map.
FP 14 0 1   Appears in the Definitive Statement as a description of the route followed by FP 14a in the GIS data. This route is shown on the Definitive Map as FP 14, but there is also a second FP 14 on the Definitive Map.
FP 14a 1 0   Appears in the GIS data as FP 14a. Recorded in statement and on Definitive Map as FP 14. (But there's also another FP 14 on the Map.)
FP 14b 1 0   Appears in the GIS data as FP 14b. Missing from the Definitive Statement, but appears on the Definitive Map as a second FP 14.

Dilham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Unclear from Statement where way starts. Route in GIS data does not meet Honing Road.
FP 9 1 0 *
BR 9 0 1   Listed as BR in Definitive Statement, but FP in GIS data.

Diss (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 39 1 1   Definitive Statement has FP 39 and FP 40 the other way round to the GIS data and the Definitive Map.
FP 40 1 1   Definitive Statement has FP 39 and FP 40 the other way round to the GIS data and the Definitive Map.

Ditchingham (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 14 1 1   Statement describes complete route for this RoW and adjoining Broome FP 14. GIS data correctly only includes part in this parish.

Downham West (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 12 0 0   Route not included in GIS data or in Definitive Statement, but shown on Definitive Map and referenced in Statement of BR 13. Route included in GIS data as part of Denver BR 12.

Drayton (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 1   Description also includes part in Horsford Parish, which should be Horsford FP 11.
FP 19 1 1   The Definitive Map (though not he GIS data) shows the north-easterly section of this route as FP 12. But there is already another FP 12 in Drayton Parish.

East Bradenham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   In the definitive statement, the historic parishes of East and West Bradenham are used. In the GIS data, this route is listed under the unified parish of "Bradenham". There are no recorded Rights of Way in West Bradenham.

East Tuddenham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Definitive Statement says route ends at Wood Lane. The line in the Definitive Map stops about 40m short. The GIS data originally matched the Map, but was updated in August 2016 to join Wood Lane.

East Winch (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 14 1 1   Statement says the route starts from the western end of RB 13, but in the GIS data and on the Definitive Map there is a gap of about 50m between TF73481506 and TF73541507.

Ellingham (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 6 1 1   Statement says route starts at TM36229232 and runs for 110m, which would take it to the A143. However, the line in the GIS data and on the Definitive Map starts at TM36259229 at the junction with Station Road.

Elsing (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 0   Present as FP in GIS data and on Definitive Map, but missing from Definitive Statement.

Emneth (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Statement says path starts at Church Road, but in GIS data and on Definitive Map it starts 50m further south. Short section unmapped at S end.

Erpingham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Unclear whether the Definitive Line lies to the north of south of the field boundary through TG17433039. Definitive map shows it to the south, but the Statement (from 1989) suggests it should follow the track to the north.

Felbrigg (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 8 0 1  

Felthorpe (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 16 1 1   GIS data for route incorrectly includes part of FP 17 too.
FP 17 1 1   Statement says route ends at FP14 and this is confirmed by the Definitive Map. However, the GIS data only has the southern section; the rest is incorrectly labelled FP16.

Feltwell (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 5 0 1   Listed in Definitive Statement as a route along Whiteplot Drove joining Methwold BR 26 and Methwold BR 32. But not present in GIS data. Probably would have been removed/modified when cut-off channel built, and partially replaced by Methwold FP 31.
RB 7 0 0   Feltwell RB 7 is mentioned in Statement for Southery RB 17 as a continuation of that route. But the route is missing from Feltwell Statement and the GIS data. Definitive map records it as having been deleted, presumably since it was coincident with an unclassified highway (U21504).
BY 15 1 1   The Definitive Statement clearly says route continues NW of BR 6 coincident with the U21506. This section is not included in the GIS data, not on the Definitive Map.

Field Dalling (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Statement says route ends at the Bale road, but Definitive Map and GIS data have it stopping on a track 50m from the road.

Flordon (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Location of the mapped bridge in OSM at TM17539756 is not consistent with the GIS data for this route and its continuation as Tharston FP 33. The Definitive Map is inconclusive. Looking at an old OS map, I think the OSM mapping is correct and the GIS data is wrong.

Foulden (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Statement says route ends at Tallent (aka Tallon) Street. But Highways GIS data shows Public Highway stops at TL76709955 20m short of the N end of the path, and the RoW stops at TL76689954 10m short of the continuation of the track.

Framingham Earl (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map.
BR 5 1 0   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map.

Framingham Pigot (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   The line in the GIS data incorrectly follows a modern track. This route is inconsistent with both the line on the Definitive Map and the description in the Definitive Statement.

Fransham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 99 1 0   Present as BR in GIS data, but missing from Definitive Statement. Route is shown on Definitive Map, but is un-numbered.

Freethorpe (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 2 1 0   Listed in Statement as RB, but as BR on Definitive Map and in GIS data. Definitive Map Amendments list says CRB was reclassified as BR in Oct-1997. Statement explicitly says that the route Starts from the public highway at St. Andrew's Church, but on the Definitive Map and GIS data, the route starts at TG42880535, which is about 150m away from the church and the end of the U59384 Public Highway at TG42760545.
RB 2 0 1   Listed in Statement as RB, but as BR on Definitive Map and in GIS data. Definitive Map Amendments list says CRB was reclassified as BR in October 1997.

Fring (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 4 0 1   Listed in Definitive Statement, but missing from GIS data. Route appears to be coincident with the U22329 Green Briar Lane between TF74223229 and TF75393375. Not shown on Definitive Map.

Fulmodeston (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 4 0 1   Description is for Thursford RB 4. There is no RB 4 in Fulmodeston.
FP 5 0 1   Description in Statement is for Fulmodeston FP 6. There is no FP 5.
FP 6 1 1   Description in Statement is for Fulmodeston FP 7. Correct description is under FP 5.
FP 7 1 1   Description in Statement is for Thursford FP 8. Correct description is under FP 6
RB 8 0 1   Description in Statement is for Thursford RB 9. There is no RB 8.
RB 9 0 1   Description in Statement is for Fulmodeston RB 10. There is no RB 9.
FP 10 0 1   Description in Statement is for Fulmodeston FP 11. There is no FP 10.
RB 10 1 0   Correct description for RB 10 is under RB 9.
FP 11 1 0   Correct description for FP 11 is under FP 10.
RB 11 0 1   Description in statement is for Fulmodeston RB 12. There is no RB 11.
RB 12 1 0   Included in GIS data as RB, but missing from Statement. Description for the route appears incorrectly under heading RB 11.

Garboldisham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 16 1 1   Statement says that route continues past NW end of RB 17 to meet public highway. Line in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at RB 17.

Gayton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Statement has not been fully updated to reflect modification of route with new housing estate.
FP 7 1 1   Statement has not been fully updated to reflect modification of route with new housing estate.
FP 17 1 0   Shown on Definitive Map and in GIS data as FP, but missing from Statement.

Gimingham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 9 0 1   Listed in Statement as FP but missing from Definitive Map and GIS data. Signs of route being removed from Map, but no entry in list of amendments.
RB 12 1 1   Description in Statement is wrong. Presumably the text belongs to FP 13 instead.
FP 13 1 0   Appears in GIS data and on Definitive Map as FP along cliffs. Missing from Statement.

Great Witchingham (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 0   Description in Definitive Statement is for Guestwick BR 6, not Great Witchingham FP 6.

Great Yarmouth (Great Yarmouth)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Statement has yet to be updated to include extension of the route along the bank fo the Yar to meet Bradwell FP 19.
FP 3 1 1   Statement doesn't include section parallel to A12, which is present in GIS data and on Definitive Map. Map shows signs of alteration to add this part, but no extension is noted in the Amendments list. North end of line in GIS data stops 20m short of FP 7a, whereas on Definitive Map the two clearly join.
FP 7a 1 1   On the Definitive Map, the routes of FP 7 and FP 7a as described in the Statement are shown as a single route labelled FP 7.

Grimston (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 1   Statement says it joins with Leziate FP 17 at the parish boundary, but there's no record of that route in either the Statement or the GIS data, and nothing is shown on the Definitive Map.
FP 20 1 1   Statement says the route starts from an Unclassified Road -- presumably U22121 Elder Lane, which according to the List of Streets and NCC Highways map ends by the Farm at TF72312140. But the route for FP20 in the GIS data and on the Definitive Map starts further south at TF72382112.

Hainford (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Listed in statement as "Church Lane", but no description of route is given.

Halvergate (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   The Definitive Statement says the path "starts from the public highway", but in GIS data the route starts further north from a track which isn't recorded as a Public Highway.
FP 11 1 1   Definitive statement says path starts "from the public highway", but on the NCC interactive map, there's a 10m gap between the path and the north end of Squires Road.

Happisburgh (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Statement says the route joins FP 2, but the statement for FP2 and the GIS data contradict this.

Hardingham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 9 1 1   Definitive Statement reference to path in Hingham incorrect. In GIS data, why doesn't S end meet with FP 11?
FP 11 1 1   In Statement, the reference to Hingham FP 1 should be Hingham FP 2, and no Hingham path at the E end. In GIS data, why doesn't E end meet with FP 9? Also part of the route shown in the GIS data actually belongs to Hingham FP 11.

Heacham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Current sea bank doesn't agree with line in GIS data in two places.

Hellesdon (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Statement suggests route stops on Berkely Close, but line in GIS data continues along Berkely Close to meet Reepham Road. GIS data matches Definitive Map.
FP 3 1 1   Should "north westwards" in the statement actually be "north eastwards"? Either way, the line in the GIS data is straight and doesn't change direction as the statement suggestions it should.
FP 7 0 1   Present as FP in Statement, but missing from GIS data. Statement appears to describe the same route as FP 4.
FP 8 0 1   Present as FP in Statement, but missing from GIS data. Statement appears to describe the same route as FP 5.

Hempnall (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Line in GIS data does not seem to match line on Definitive Map, and neiter appear consistent with the description in the Statement that the route ends by "enter[ing] the churchyard at its north eastern corner by a stile".
FP 18 1 1   Statement says route starts from Field Lane, and then proceeds eastwards crossing Lower Lane. In GIS data, route starts further east from Lower Lane at TM24219313. Definitive map shows evidence of this initial section being deleted, so presumably the Statement was accidentally not updated.
FP 19 0 1   Listed in Statement as FP but not in GIS data. Morningthorpe FP 7 referenced in statement doesn't reach parish boundary. According to Definitive Map Amendments list, this was deleted when 30-32 were created.
FP 21 0 1   Listed in Statement as FP but not in GIS data. There seems to have been some changes to Morningthorpe FP 13 and Hempnall FP 22. Was this path stopped up at that time?

Hethersett (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   GIS data also incorrectly includes the part of this route that is actually Ketteringham FP 6.

Hevingham (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 9 1 1   Reference in Statement to "Restricted Byway No 7" should be "Buxton Bridleway No 7", and reference to "Strawless Restricted Byway No. 5" should be "Strawless Bridleway No. 5".

Hickling (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but as RB in GIS data. Definitive Map shows route as CRF, without re-classification, hence RB now. Also referred to as RB in Statement for FP 4.
RB 3 1 0   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but as RB in GIS data. Definitive Map shows route as CRF, without re-classification, hence should be RB now. Also referred to as RB in Statement for FP 4. On Definitive Map and GIS data, the route starts S of Dairy Hour Farm, but statement says from the E end of "The Walk". In NCC Highways data, "The Walk" does not extend E of the junction with Suckling Lane.
FP 4 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but as RB in GIS data. Definitive Map shows route as CRF, without re-classification, hence RB now.
RB 4 1 0   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but as RB in GIS data. Definitive Map shows route as CRF, without re-classification, hence RB now.
FP 6 1 1   Statement says path runs "to the Green", but the line on the Definitive Map and in the GIS data stops short of this road.

Hilgay (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 25 1 1   The grid references in the Statement are not consistent with the GIS data. The grid references have the route displaced about 50m E.
BR 26 1 1   According to the Definitive Statement and the GIS data, there's a gap of about 50m between the ends of BR 25 and BR 26. Is this deliberate? What rights are there over the gap? The Definitive Map is inconclusive.

Hindringham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 0 1   Recorded as BR on Definitive Map and in GIS data. Listed as FP in statement.
BR 1 1 0   Recorded as BR on Definitive Map and in GIS data. Listed as FP in statement.

Hingham (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Definitive Statement says end of path remains along the eastern boundary of a field, and the Definitive Map supports this. However, the GIS data clearly has the path crossing to the the western boundary of the adjacent field at TG03260345.
FP 7 1 1  
FP 11 0 1   Present as FP Definitive Statement, but not in GIS data. Original route probably mostly extinguished with other diversions involving FP 2 and FP 3, but definitive map shows a short section still remaining. In the GIS data, this route is incorrectly shown as part of Hardingham FP 11.

Hockwold-cum-Wilton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BY 4 1 1   Statement says route ends at Church Lane, but route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops about 30m metres short.
BR 6 0 1   Listed as BR 6 in Statement and BR 6a in GIS data. Definitive Map shows number as 6.
BR 6a 1 0   Listed as BR 6 in Statement and BR 6a in GIS data. The Definitive Map shows the number as 6, and route is mapped in OSM under this number.

Holt (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 14 0 1   Present in Statement, but missing from GIS data. Presumably this is/was a short link between Letheringsett FP2 and FP3 across the railway. Signs of changes having been made on the Definitive Map, but nothing listed in the Amendments section.
FP 15 1 1   Definitive Statement says path starts from road by Holt Lodge. GIS data and Definitive Map only show eastern section. Signs of changes having been made on the Definitive Map, but nothing listed in the Amendments section.
FP 18 1 1   Southern line segment in GIS data contains three points, but last is a duplicate of the first. Hence distance is double-counted on that spur. Total length of path should be 200m, not 259m.

Holverston (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Historic OS maps show a different alignment for this path from the GIS data and Definitive Map. The statement is vague, but would be consistent with either. See also Yelverton FP 2.

Honingham (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 1 0   Listed in GIS data as FP, and recorded on Definitive Map. Missing from Definitive Statement.

Hopton (Great Yarmouth)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1a 1 0   Shown as FP in GIS data but missing from Definitive Statement. This is one of two FP1s on the Definitive Map.
FP 2a 1 0   Shown as FP in GIS data but missing from Definitive Statement. This is one of two FP2s on the Definitive Map.

Horning (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 4 1 1   The Statement says this returns to Lower Street, but the Definitive Map and GIS data are missing the final link back to the road.
FP 6 1 1   Statement says this terminates at Lower Street, but line on Definitive Map and in GIS data stops at edge of Recreation Ground.

Horsford (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 1   Description also includes part in Drayton Parish, which should be Drayton FP 11.

Horsham St Faith and Newton St Faith (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 3 0 1   Marketfield Lane. Listed in Statement as RB, missing from GIS data. Appears to have been removed from the Definitive Map, but no entry in the Amendments table. Appears in the List of Streets as U57231.
BR 6 1 1   Incorrectly still appears in GIS data and statement as of 2020-02.

Houghton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 7 1 0   Included as FP in GIS data, but missing from Definitive Statement. Route not within modern or historic parish bounds. Should be in Bircham Parish instead, but there's no description in the Statement there either.
RB 8 1 0   Included as RB in GIS data, but missing from Definitive Statement. Route not within modern or historic parish bounds. Should be in Bircham Parish instead, but there's no description in the Statement there either.

Hoveton (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 7 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but RB in GIS Data. Referred to as RB from other Statements. Shown as CRF on Definitive map, so would be RB now unless modified.
RB 7 1 0   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but RB in GIS Data. Referred to as RB from other Statements. Shown as CRF on Definitive map, so would be RB now unless modified.
FP 8 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but RB in GIS Data. Referred to as RB from other Statements. Shown as CRF on Definitive map, so would be RB now unless modified.
RB 8 1 0   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but RB in GIS Data. Referred to as RB from other Statements. Shown as CRF on Definitive map, so would be RB now unless modified.

Itteringham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 17 0 1   Listed in statement as "Footpath 17 (Restricted Byway ...)", but should be "Restricted Byway 17 (...)".
RB 17 1 0   Listed in statement as "Footpath 17 (Restricted Byway ...)", but should be "Restricted Byway 17 (...)".

Ketteringham (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 0 1   Present in statement, but Missing from GIS data. GIS data incorrectly records the route as part of Hethersett FP 6.

King's Lynn (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 8 1 1   Statement is inconsistent with GIS data and Definitive Map. Statement says route goes in a Southerly direction and is 655 yds long. In GIS data it's only 290m, and goes East-West.
FP 10 1 1   Statement says route starts from end of RB 12, but lines do not meet in GIS data. Statement also refers to a footbridge (presumably now removed) and contains an erroneous repetition near the start.
FP 12 1 0   Listed as FP in GIS data, but RB in Statement. Definitive Map Amendments list says CRB 12 reclassified as FP 12.
RB 12 0 1  
FP 39 0 1   Listed as FP in Statement, but BR in GIS data. Definitive Map unclear, but square around number indicates at least BR rights.
BR 39 1 0   Listed as FP in Statement, but BR in GIS data. Definitive Map unclear, but square around number indicates at least BR rights.

Kirby Cane (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 8 0 1   Listed as BR in GIS data, but FP in Statement. Definitive map shows route as FP, and it's listed as such in the Amendments section.
BR 8 1 0   Listed as BR in GIS data, but FP in Statement. Definitive map shows route as FP, and it's listed as such in the Amendments section.

Knapton (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 0 1   Listed as FP in Statement, but BR in GIS data.
BR 2 1 0   Listed as FP in Statement, but BR in GIS data.
FP 4 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but BR in GIS Data. Referred to as BR from other Statements.
BR 4 1 0   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but BR in GIS Data. Referred to as BR from other Statements.
FP 5 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but RB in GIS Data. Referred to as RB from other Statements.
RB 5 1 0   Definitive Map shows route occupying full route from B1145 to C421. Line in GIS data stops at junction with FP 6. Statement is ambiguous over length, but does say route "continues to county road". However, the full length of Swafield Lane is an Unclassified Highway, so part of the GIS line overlaps this.
FP 6 1 1   1km section is part of FP 6 on Definitive Map and GIS data, but part of FP 8 in the Definitive Statement.
FP 8 1 1   1km section is part of FP 6 on Definitive Map and GIS data, but part of FP 8 in the Definitive Statement.
FP 11 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but RB in GIS Data. Referred to as RB from other Statements.
RB 11 1 0   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement, but RB in GIS Data. Referred to as RB from other Statements.

Langham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 0 1   Recorded as FP in Statement, but BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map.
BR 2 1 0   Recorded as FP in Statement, but BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map.

Letheringsett (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Statement says the RoW ends W of the now disused railway, but GIS data and Definitive Map have it continuing all the way to TG07113801. Is the GIS line all of FP2, FP3 and Holt FP 14 as described in the Statements?
FP 3 0 1   Present as FP in Definitive Statement, but missing from GIS data. Presumably this is/was the section of the GIS data for FP 2 that is E of the disused railway.

Leziate (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 17 0 0   Leziate FP 17 is referred to in Statement for Grimston FP 11, but not listed in Leziate Statement nor in GIS data.

Little Barningham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 8 1 1   Grid reference TG12343271 is for the point after the "westerly for approximately 205 metres" section, whereas in the statement it claims it's before.

Little Dunham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   In GIS data, the route ends on the parish boundary, but in the Statement it says the route ends by joining Sporle Road. I presume that the GIS data is wrong, as a result of a slight inaccuracy in the route on the definitive map.

Long Stratton (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 0   Included in GIS data and on Definitive Map as FP along or parallel to Manor Road in front of the School, but missing from Definitive Statement.

Ludham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Definitive map has not been updated to show shorter route following construction of Latchmoor Park residential road. Statement and GIS data show the new shorter route.
FP 21 0 1   Listed as RB in GIS data, but as FP in Statement. Shown as CRB in Definitive Map with no sign of alterations.
RB 21 1 0   Listed as RB in GIS data, but as FP in Statement. Shown as CRB in Definitive Map with no sign of alterations.
FP 26 1 0   Shown as FP on Definitive Map and in GIS data, but as RB in Statement. Mapped route in OSM at NW end does not quite agree with GIS data / definitive map.
RB 26 0 1  
FP 38 0 1   Included as FP in Statement, but absent from Definitive Map and GIS data. Presumed to be contiguous with E-W part of U19126 Malthouse Lane.
FP 39 1 1   Statement says route starts from Fritton Road, but on Definitive Map and in GIS data the route starts 120m N at TG40131922.

Lynford (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 4 1 1   Listed in Definitive Statement as BR, but has the same description as RB 5. Recorded in GIS data as BR along Little Ouse north from Santon Road.
FP 6 1 1   The Definitive Map and GIS data show the path continuing over (half of) a footbridge at TL82548727. This is a 20m or so away from the location of the actual footbridge.

Marham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 7 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map; referred to as BR in Pentney statement.
BR 7 1 0   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Shown as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map; referred to as BR in Pentney statement.

Marsham (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 7 1 1   Statement says route runs along the southern boundary of the churchyard, but this doesn't seem to be quite the case according to the GIS data and the Definitive Map.

Mattishall (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Statement says route ends at "Stone Lane". If this is the C211A "Stone Road", then the GIS data and Definitive Map are missing the last 400m of the route, as it stops at TG03111226.
FP 5 0 1   Recorded as FP 5 in the Statement and on the Definitive Map, but as FP 5a in the GIS data.
FP 5a 1 0   Recorded as FP 5 in the Statement and on the Definitive Map, but as FP 5a in the GIS data.

Methwold (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 29 1 0   Recorded as FP in GIS data and on Definitive Map, but missing from Definitive Statement. FP 29 is referenced from the description for BR 28.
FP 30 0 0  
BR 32 1 1   Statement is not consistent with the line in the GIS data and on the Definitive Map. Presumably the route was modified when the cut-off channel was built, but the Statement wasn't updated.

Narborough (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Statement suggests route starts from old A47 (now C537) whereas GIS data has the route starting from the end of River Close. Has there been a diversion order? There's evidence of a change being made on the Definitive Map, but no record in the Amendments section.

Neatishead (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 0 1   Listed in Statement as FP, but referred to as RB in other statements. Recorded in GIS data as RB and on definitive map as CRF. Presumably should be RB.
RB 4 1 0   Listed in Statement as FP, but referred to as RB in other statements. Recorded in GIS data as RB and on definitive map as CRF. Presumably should be RB.
FP 9 0 1   Listed in Statement as FP, but referred to as RB in other statements. Recorded in GIS data as RB and on definitive map as CRF. Presumably should be RB.
RB 9 1 0   Listed in Statement as FP, but referred to as RB in other statements. Recorded in GIS data as RB and on definitive map as CRF. Presumably should be RB.
FP 10 1 1   Statement ends with "runs southwards to Footpath No. 8". Presumably this is a transcription error, being a repetition of the end of the statement for FP 7. The route should "runs southwards to Mill Loke."
FP 12 1 1   Statement implies route stops at FP 13, but GIS data and Definitive Map have it continuing east to meet the public highway.
FP 16 1 1   Appears as CRF on Definitive map, with no sign of any modification. Therefore should be RB now. However, appears as FP in GIS data and on Definitive Statement. Statement for FP 15 refers to it as RB though.

Necton (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Line in GIS data goes through several buildings. Has the route been diverted, or should it have been? Or is the GIS data wrong?

North Walsham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Statement says the route starts from the North Walsham Road, but the line on the definitive map and in the GIS data starts about 50m down a track at TG27812921.

Northrepps (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 0 1   Recorded as FP in Statement, but BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map. Map Amendments say route upgraded 1998-08, so Statement is presumably out of date.
BR 4 1 0   Recorded as FP in Statement, but BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map. Map Amendments say route upgraded 1998-08, so Statement is presumably out of date.
FP 17 0 1   Recorded in Statement as FP, but missing from GIS data. Definitive Map shows route as a short link at the S end of Roughton FP 2. In the GIS data, this segment is erroneously included as part of Roughton FP 2.

Northwold (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement and on Definitive Map, but mistakenly recorded as BR in GIS data.
BR 4 1 0   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement and on Definitive Map, but mistakenly recorded as BR in GIS data.

Outwell (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Statement says path continues to parish boundary to meet Nordelph BR 2, but GIS data stops opposite Langhorns Lane. GIS data (though not the statement) was updated 2015-11-12, but this only affected the NW end -- making it less consistent with the Statement and the Definitive Map.

Outwell Isle (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 0   Appears as FP in GIS data, but Outwell Isle parish is completely missing from the Definitive Statement file.
FP 2 1 0   Appears as FP in GIS data, but Outwell Isle parish is completely missing from the Definitive Statement file.
BR 3 1 0   Appears as BR in GIS data, but Outwell Isle parish is completely missing from the Definitive Statement file.
BY 4 1 0   Appears as BY in GIS data, but Outwell Isle parish is completely missing from the Definitive Statement file.
BY 5 1 0   Appears as BY in GIS data, but Outwell Isle parish is completely missing from the Definitive Statement file.
BY 6 1 0   Appears as BY in GIS data, but Outwell Isle parish is completely missing from the Definitive Statement file.

Overstrand (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5 1 1   The Definitive Map shows this path joining up with FP 1. However, there is a gap between TG24394117 and TG24474114 in the GIS data, and the Statement refers to the path ending at a point east of the eastern end of FP 1.

Poringland (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Statement says that the route starts at the northern end of Grove Road. But the GIS data and Definitive Map have the route starting at TG25950171, which is about 200m north of the end of the U78053 'The Grove' at TG25980152 as shown in the NCC highways data.
FP 2 1 1  
FP 10 1 1   Definitive Statement says route starts from BY 14, but in GIS data it starts a few meters further south from the parallel FP 9.

Potter Heigham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 1   First grid reference given in the statement is TG4070820201, which corresponds to a point in the middle of the route, not at the start as stated.
FP 14 1 1   Statement says that the from TG42612024 the path runs west along the northern side of a dyke, but on the Definitive Map the route is shown on the southern side from this point. There is a short un-numbered line on the map on the northern side further west though.

Pulham Market (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 0 1   Listed in the Definitive Statement, but missing from the Definitive Map and GIS data. Amendments list on Definitive map states route was deleted in November 2000.

Pulham St Mary (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 24 1 1   Statement says route starts from Garlic Street, but line in GIS data and on Definitive Map starts at TM22178370, which is 200m from the end of the U76214 Public Highway at TM22008373, as shown on the NCC website.

Raynham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 13 1 0   Included in GIS data as RB, but missing from Definitive Statement.

Ringland (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Statement clearly says route starts from Back Lane at the rear of Pitt Farm. But the GIS data and Definitive Map have the route starting from The Street, and following Back Lane.

Rollesby (Great Yarmouth)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 1   Statement says path starts from the public highway at Narrowgate Corner. GIS data and Definitive Map has the route starting at TG44741513, with the road between here and the U69331 Court Road at TG44701521 not recorded as a Highway or Right of Way.

Roughton (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   GIS data erroneously includes an extra section at the S end of this route, which should be Northrepps FP 17 according to the Definitive Map and Statement.

Runcton Holme (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 1 1 1   Presumably route should have been diverted when river course altered. Was it though? Definitive Map shows route cut by Relief Channel, without the obvious connection being added.

Runton (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 11 1 1   Statement says the route ends at the Public Highway, but the line on the definitive map ends 30m away. The lane area off the main road is not shown as part of the Public Highway on the NCC Highway Boundaries map.

Salhouse (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 15 1 0 *

Salle (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 4 1 1   Listed in Statement as "Footpath No 4", but description actually says it is "a public bridleway". Shown on Definitive Map and in GIS data as BR.

Saxlingham Nethergate (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 14 1 1   In GIS data, this doesn't join RB17 at its junction with FP19 as Definitive Statement claims. The reason (as seen from the amendments on the Definitive Map) is that that FP19 has been diverted and now joins RB17 further north.
FP 26 1 1   Mapped route in OSM follows path on ground between TM21899661 and TM21689623, but this doesn't agree with the Definitive Map and GIS data. I suspect the OSM route is correct, and the recently diverted route for that section simply wasn't recorded accurately on the Definitive Map.

Scole (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 1   Statement says the path ends at St Andrew's Church, but the line in GIS data stops short.
BR 39 1 1   Definitive Statement has length at 250m, but in GIS data and on Definitive map it is only about 50m. Given Statement for BR 45, the GIS data is probably correct.
BR 45 1 1   Route does not appear on Definitive Map (online scan, as of October 2016) but is included in GIS data.

Scottow (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 0   Statement says RoW has been deleted 2012-07, but still listed in GIS data. Definitive Map shows a new route further north in Westwick parish (Westwick FP 6), while GIS data still has old route.

Sea Palling (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5 1 1   Statement says path runs "to the beach", but line in GIS data stops about 50m short.

Sheringham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 1   Statement says the path commences at the east end of Nelson Road. However, the maintained section of Nelson Road ends at Hillside Road at TG16764316 (and Conway Road is not included in the List of Streets), while according to the Definitive Map and GIS data, the path doesn't start until TG16874310.
FP 26 1 1   Statement clearly describes the route running south along the western boundary of the pond to join the Esplanade. But this section is missing from the Definitive Map and the GIS data.

Shipdham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Description in Definitive Statement is for Shropham FP 2, but isn't a direct copy of it.
FP 12 1 1   Description in Definitive Statement is out of date compared with GIS data.
BR 15 1 1   Oddly, GIS data for route was updated 2016-06-27, but route appears unaltered. Definitive map shows diversion to current line made in January 2003, but lines on map appear to have been drawn carelessly.
BR 16 1 1   Oddly, GIS data for route was updated 2016-06-27, but route appears unaltered. Definitive map shows diversion to current line made in January 2003, but lines on map appear to have been drawn carelessly.
RB 21 1 0   Present as RB in GIS data and on Definitive map. Missing from Statement, but referred to by other entries.

Snettisham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 13 1 1   Something is wrong with the description: "runs for approximately 2.7 metres to the north east for a distance of approximately 198 metres".
BY 24 1 1   Definitive Statement also describes all of BR28. (Whole route used to CRB 24, but according to Definitive Map Amendments list, the southern part was reclassified as BY, and northern part reclassified and renumbered as BR 28.)
RB 25 0 1  
FP 26 0 1   There are two path 26's shown on the definitive map, a Footpath along the beach from TF64713350 to TF66153585, and a Restricted Byway (actually a CRF) in the village between TF68523422 and TF68553428. Both are included in the GIS data as a single RB route. Only the Footpath is described in the Definitive Statement.
RB 26 1 0   There are two path 26's shown on the definitive map, a Footpath along the beach from TF64713350 to TF66153585, and a Restricted Byway (actually a CRF) in the village between TF68523422 and TF68553428. Both are included in the GIS data as a single RB route. Only the Footpath is described in the Definitive Statement.

South Creake (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 10 1 0 *
RB 10 0 1   Listed as RB in Definitive Statement, but shown as FP in GIS data and on Definitive Map.

South Lopham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 8 1 1   Description in Definitive Statement is a duplicate of FP 9. Recorded as FP in GIS data, which does run between Redgrave Road to FP 11.
FP 16 1 1   Definitive Statement says route starts at Brickkiln Lane, but in GIS data, the route stops about 50m W of the lane (U33157). Unclear why, or what the status of the missing segment is.

Southery (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Definitive statement says the route should start from Ringmore Drove at junction with FP 7. In GIS data and on Definitive Map, the route starts about 120m NE at the end of the U21393 Black Bank Drove Highway.
FP 14 1 1   Statement says route joins Feltwell FP 8 at the parish boundary, but there is no such route in the Statement or on the Definitive Map
BR 15 0 1   Listed in Definitive Statement as BR, but missing from GIS data. Definitive Map records it as having been deleted, presumably as coincident with U21281 Creek Lane.
RB 17 1 1   Southery Statement says this route continues as Feltwell RB 7. But that route is missing from the Feltwell Statement and GIS data.

Sprowston (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 9 1 0   Shown on Definitive Map and in GIS data as FP, but missing from Definitive Statement.
FP 11 1 0   Shown on Definitive Map and in GIS data as FP, but missing from Definitive Statement.

Stoke Ferry (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 14 1 1   Statement says route meets BR 15 on the N bank of the river (which previously followed the boundary). Presumably this should have been modified when the cut-off channel changed things, but RB14 should surely continue to meet RB15 now.
RB 16 1 0   Recorded as RB in GIS data and on Definitive Map, but missing from Definitive Statement.

Stokesby with Herringby (Great Yarmouth)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 8 1 0   Present in GIS data and on Definitive Map as FP, but missing from Definitive Statement.

Stow Bardolph (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 21 1 1   Statement clearly says the route crosses the railway to meet FP 3, but on the Definitive Map and in the GIS data, the line stops to the east of the tracks.

Strumpshaw (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 10 1 1   On Definitive Map and in GIS data, the SE end of the route stops about 30m short of the U59406. The statement says the route starts from the road.
FP 12 0 1   Recorded as RB in GIS data, but as FP in Statement. Shown on Definitive Map as CRB, with no sign of modification, so should be RB now.
RB 12 1 0   Recorded as RB in GIS data, but as FP in Statement. Shown on Definitive Map as CRB, with no sign of modification, so should be RB now.

Swaffham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 25 1 1   Statement says E end of route is at Norwich Road. In GIS data the route stops short. Definitive Map is inconclusive.
FP 30 1 1   GIS data erroenously includes part of FP 65 between Mangate Street at TF82130905 and the true end of FP 30 at TF82130902.
RB 47 1 1   GIS data and Definitive Map have route stopping at TF83110711, about 70m short of Watton Road -- the end point in the Statement.
RB 59 0 1   Listed as RB in Definitive Statement. Was previously in GIS data, as route along Maiden's Lane from TF79391038 to TF79931134, but no longer present. Evidence it used to be present on the Definitive Map, but now erased. Nothing in the Amendments section though. Has the route been stopped up?
RB 60 1 1   Statement says RB goes from Westacre Road to Fincham Drove. Route in GIS data and on Definitive Map stops at TF79971021 after less than 850m.

Swannington (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 19 1 1   GIS data incorrectly has route continuing east to meet FP 16. Statement and Definitive Map state route stops at FP 21.
FP 21 1 1   GIS data incorrectly has route stopping at FP 19. Statement and Definitive Map state route continues east to meet FP 16.

Swanton Abbott (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   Statement claims route follows norther boundary of church, but Definitive Map and GIS data show is to the south.
FP 11a 1 0   Listed in GIS data as FP. Missing from Statement. Shown on Definitive Map as a second FP 11.

Terrington St Clement (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 14 0 1   Listed as RB in Definitive Statement, but not present in GIS data or on Definitive Map. Claims to run NE from Greenmarsh farm at TF55692186.
FP 15 1 1   No statement provided, just a note that the original was found to be incompatible with the Definitive Map in April 2007.

Tharston (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 8 1 1   Statement says path starts from Hapton Street / Cow Lane junction, but Definitive map and GIS data have it starting further N on Cow Lane.
FP 34 1 1   All grid references in the Statement should be +10 in the northings.

Thetford (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 15 1 1   Route on Definitive Map does not match that in GIS data. Statement has modification date of June 2000, but no evidence of an update on the map.

Thornham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 5 1 1   Statement says route starts from The Green, but Definitive Map and GIS data show it starting 160m further north at TF73764398.

Thursford (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 4 1 1   Included in Statement for Thursford without description. Statement included in error as RB 4 under Fulmodeston.
FP 7 1 1   Included in Statement for Thursford without description. Statement for this route appears to be completely missing.
FP 8 1 1   Included in Statement for Thursford without description. Statement included in error under Fulmodeston, where it is listed as FP 7.
RB 9 1 1   Included in Statement for Thursford without description. Statement included in error under Fulmodeston, where it is listed as FP 8.

Tilney All Saints (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Statement says clearly that the route starts from Church Road, but on the Definitive Map and in the GIS data it instead starts at the end of the U21471 Cotts Lane at TF56711807.

Titchwell (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 1 0 1   Recorded as BR in Definitive Statement, but RB in GIS data. Definitive Map still lists is as CRB, which would make it RB.
RB 1 1 0   Recorded as BR in Definitive Statement, but RB in GIS data. Definitive Map still lists is as CRB, which would make it RB.

Tivetshall St Margaret (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 15 1 1   Statement says path starts at Hales Street and ends at NW end of FP 17. In GIS data and on the Definitive Map, the path starts further south and ends at Grove Road.

Toft Monks (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 10 1 1   Definitive Statement says route ends at Pound Lane. GIS data and Definitive map have it stopping short at a junction with FP 11.

Topcroft (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 9 1 1   Definitive Statement says route enters Topcroft Street, but in GIS data and the Definitive map the route stops 30m short of the main highway.

Trimingham (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 1 1 1   Definitive Statement says route goes to the "edge of the cliffs", but on the Definitive Map the route continues to the mean high water mark, and in the GIS data it continues to the low water mark.

Trunch (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 11 1 1   Definitive Statement and Map include two forks. The northern one appears in the GIS data as FP 12 rather than FP 11.
FP 12 1 1   Appears in Statement file as FP with description of "No Statement". Doesn't appears on Definitive Map. Appears in GIS data as one of the forks of FP 11.

Upwell Isle (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 1 0   Appears as FP in GIS data, but no entries at all for this parish in the Definitive Statement.
FP 2 1 0   Appears as FP in GIS data, but no entries at all for this parish in the Definitive Statement.
FP 3 1 0   Appears as FP in GIS data, but no entries at all for this parish in the Definitive Statement.
FP 4 1 0   Appears as FP in GIS data, but no entries at all for this parish in the Definitive Statement.
FP 6 1 0   Appears as FP in GIS data, but no entries at all for this parish in the Definitive Statement.
FP 7 1 0   Appears as FP in GIS data, but no entries at all for this parish in the Definitive Statement.

Wacton (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 20 0 1   Recorded as FP in the Definitive Statement. Shown as RB in GIS data; referred to as such in other statements in the parish too. Shown as CRF on Definitive map, so in the absence of an explicit re-classification would be RB now.
RB 20 1 0   Recorded as FP in the Definitive Statement. Shown as RB in GIS data; referred to as such in other statements in the parish too. Shown as CRF on Definitive map, so in the absence of an explicit re-classification would be RB now.
RB 30 1 0   Recorded as RB in GIS data, but missing from Definitive Statement. Other RoWs in statement reference RB 30 though.
FP 33 0 1   Recorded as FP in the Definitive Statement. Shown as RB in GIS data; referred to as such in other statements in the parish too. Shown as CRF on Definitive map, so in the absence of an explicit re-classification would be RB now.
RB 33 1 0   Recorded as FP in the Definitive Statement. Shown as RB in GIS data; referred to as such in other statements in the parish too. Shown as CRF on Definitive map, so in the absence of an explicit re-classification would be RB now.
FP 34 0 1   Recorded as FP in the Definitive Statement. Shown as RB in GIS data; referred to as such in other statements in the parish too. Shown as CRF on Definitive map, so in the absence of an explicit re-classification would be RB now.
RB 34 1 0 *
FP 35 0 1   Recorded as FP in the Definitive Statement. Shown as RB in GIS data; referred to as such in other statements in the parish too. Shown as CRF on Definitive map, so in the absence of an explicit re-classification would be RB now.
RB 35 1 0 *
RB 39 1 0   Recorded as RB in GIS data, but missing from Definitive Statement.

Watlington (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5 1 1   One of the forks mentioned in the Statement is instead labelled as FP 5a in the GIS data.
FP 5a 1 0   Present in GIS data as Footpath. No 5a in the Definitive Statement, but the route is described there as a branch of FP5. The Definitive Map agrees with the statement, and labels both branches as FP 5.

Watton (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 14 1 0   Previously included for "information purposes" in Definitive Statement, but an Adopted Footway, not a Public Right of Way. No longer listed in statement, but still included in GIS data, and appears on the Definitive Map. So what is this route's status?

Wereham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 4 0 1   Appears in Statement but missing from GIS data and Definitive Map.
RB 11 1 0   Recorded as RB in GIS data and on Definitive Map, but missing from Definitive Statement.

West Caister (Great Yarmouth)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 7 1 0   Listed as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map, but as BY in Statement. Definitive Map amendment lists says CRB 7 reclassified as BR in January 1996.
BY 7 0 1   Listed as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map, but as BY in Statement. Definitive Map amendment lists says CRB 7 reclassified as BR in January 1996.
FP 14 0 1   Recorded as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map, but as FP in Statement.
BR 14 1 0   Recorded as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map, but as FP in Statement.

West Dereham (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Statement says route ends at the Fordham - Boughton road, but the GIS data has it stopping short by Willow Farm. A DMMO from 2015-09 adds the missing link to get to the road, but the Statement for FP 2 needs updating.
FP 3 1 1   Statement says the route connects with Wereham FP 4. That route is listed in the Statements, but has been removed from the Definitive map.

West Winch (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 3 1 1   Statement doesn't mention final stretch following Back Lane south-wards to Watering Lane, which is present in the GIS data and on the Definitive Map.

Westwick (North Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 6 1 1   GIS data has not been updated to match new route (approximately 320m long) as indicated in Definitive Statement and on Definitive Map.

Winterton-on-Sea (Great Yarmouth)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 15 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Recorded as RB in GIS data, and tagged as such in OSM.
RB 15 1 0   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Recorded as RB in GIS data, and tagged as such in OSM.

Wood Dalling (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 5 1 1   Grid reference TG09682638 in Statement is incorrect. It should be something like TG09582638.

Woodbastwick (Broadland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 1 0 1   Listed as BR in GIS data, but FP in Statement. Shown as BR on Definitive Map.
BR 1 1 0   Listed as BR in GIS data, but FP in Statement. Shown as BR on Definitive Map.

Wormegay (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
BR 3 1 0   Recorded as BR in GIS data and on Definitive Map, but missing from Definitive Statement. Note that route appears to be coincident with the U21384 Saxon Way and Petticoat Lane.

Wreningham (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 12 0 1   Listed as FP in Definitive Statement. Missing from GIS data. Route has been removed from the Definitive Map, with the Amendments table showing it was deleted in September 2000.

Wretham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 9 1 1   The Statement refers to this route meeting "FP 10" -- but this doesn't seem to be the current BR 10, as the two are not joined. What happened to the original Wretham FP 10?

Wretton (King's Lynn & West Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 9 1 0   Recorded as RB in GIS data and on Definitive Map, but missing from Definitive Statement.

Wymondham (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 7 1 1   Definitive Statement refers to two branches, but only one is present in the GIS data, and only this route is obvious on the ground. The Definitive Map clearly shows two branches, both of which pass through what are now private gardens, and neither of which match the route in the GIS data. Presumably, the necessary modification orders were either not made or not implemented correctly.

Yaxham (Breckland)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
RB 8 1 0   Listed in statement as a proposed RB only, but appears in GIS data and on Definitive Map. Has it now been confirmed?
RB 9 1 0   Listed in statement as a proposed RB only, but appears in GIS data and on Definitive Map. Has it now been confirmed?
RB 10 1 0   Listed in statement as a proposed RB only, but appears in GIS data and on Definitive Map. Has it now been confirmed?

Yelverton (South Norfolk)

GIS Map & Details | Definitive Statement (DS)

Type No. GIS? DS? UD Notes
FP 2 1 1   Historic OS maps show a different alignment for this path from the GIS data and Definitive Map. The statement is vague, but would be more consistent with the latter (no mention of running along the boundary). See also Holverston FP 1.